So, I ask again. If there is no proof of 93 crashing wherever, why should we take the hole in PA as being the site of the crash? It's a hole! Not much more. The proof being unavailable is more consistent with a shoot down out of high altitude. See...that whats happened. It was shot down. that's WHY no proof exists, and why the best shills can't counter the fact with anything, because there ISN'T anything. Next question. Why was it shot down and why did they have to lie about it?