Gay males and sexual practices

Historically, anal sex has been popularly associated with male homosexuality and MSM. Many MSM, however, do not engage in anal sex, and may engage in oral sex, frottage or frot, or mutual masturbation instead.

Wellings et al. reported that "the equation of 'homosexual' with 'anal' sex among men is common among lay and health professionals alike," whereas an online survey of 18,000 MSM in Europe "showed that oral sex was most commonly practised, followed by mutual masturbation, with anal intercourse in third place."

Reports pertaining to the prevalence of anal sex among MSM have varied over time, with some percentages higher than others.[9][18][19][20] A large percentage of gay and bisexual men self-report lifetime participation in anal sex.[9] Studies among gay men have indicated that percentages are similar when comparing men who prefer to penetrate their partners to those who prefer to be the receptive partner.[9][21] Some men who have sex with men, however, believe that being a receptive partner during anal sex questions their masculinity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_sexual_practices

 

Men who have sex with men (MSM), also known as males who have sex with males, are male persons who engage in sexual activity with members of the same sex, regardless of how they identify themselves; many such men do not sexually identify as gay, homosexual or bisexual.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_who_have_sex_with_men

 

Zoophilia is a paraphilia involving a sexual fixation on non-human animals. Bestiality is cross-species sexual activity between human and non-human animals. The terms are often used interchangeably, but some researchers make a distinction between the attraction (zoophilia) and the act (bestiality).[1]

Although sex with animals is not outlawed in some countries, in most countries, bestiality is illegal under animal abuse laws or laws dealing with buggery or crimes against nature.




Three key terms commonly used in regards to the subject — zoophilia, bestiality, and zoosexuality — are often used somewhat interchangeably. Some researchers distinguish between zoophilia (as a persistent sexual interest in animals) and bestiality (as sexual acts with animals), because bestiality is often not driven by a sexual preference for animals.[1] Some studies have found that a preference for animals is rare among people who engage in sexual contact with animals.[2] Furthermore, some zoophiles report that they have never had sexual contact with an animal.[3] People with zoophilia are known as "zoophiles", though also sometimes as "zoosexuals", or even very simply "zoos".[1][4]Zooerasty, sodomy, and zooerastia[5] are other terms closely related to the subject but are less synonymous with the former terms, and are seldom used. "Bestiosexuality" was discussed briefly by Allen (1979), but never became widely established.[citation needed] Ernest Bornemann (1990, cited by Rosenbauer, 1997) coined the separate term zoosadism for those who derive pleasure – sexual or otherwise – from inflicting pain on animals. Zoosadism specifically is one member of the Macdonald triad of precursors to sociopathic behavior.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia


zoroastrian??

 

Whaaaaaaat the......... It isn't called gay anymore?

How you self-identify is uninteresting, you may self-identify as a "New York Yankees-fan" and still be homosexual. If you desire sex with the same sex, you are gay (or bi). Simple as that.

Please, let us not confuse the language more than we already have.

 

Zoroastrianism,[n 1] or more natively Mazdayasna, is one of the world's oldest extant religions, "combining a cosmogonic dualism and eschatological monotheism in a manner unique [...] among the major religions of the world".[1] Ascribed to the teachings of the Iranian prophet Zoroaster (or Zarathustra).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrianism


Zoroaster is to Iran as Muhammad is to Saudi Arabia??


Just as Muhammad was against cannibalism, Zoroaster was probably against zoophiliaism.

 

If Iran had a prophet and Saudi Arabia had a prophet and Israel had a prophet and many of the other Countries had a prophet, who would the prophet to the 'pagans' be that would turn them around from things such as cannibalism and zoophiliaisms to the more 'wholesome' things?

 

maybe males who have sex with males but do not identify themselves as gay or bi are like those who eat tree bark but don't identify themselves as being vegetarian.. Or those who drink 'blood' but don't identify themselves as being 'vampires'.

 

Self-deniers in other words, no?

 

Key word here. One's willingness to engage in homosexual activity (especially if one's continued health or living is on the line) is not the same as one's desire to engage in it. MSM does not make any indication of one's willingness vs one's desire.

 

Makes sense. Women have anuses too, and most straight men dont wanna go there either. Whats more, the skin inside the mouth is pretty similar to the skin inside the vagina.

I cant imagine going gay and suddenly wanting to put my d**k in a poophole (though I cant imagine going gay either...).

 

Yeah it's on the down low. They really are homosexual or bisexual they just don't want people to know about it.

 

I can't believe anyone does it. When I was first told way back when, I threw up.

 

Good post. I fondly remember the days when 'gay' meant happy and carefree, and full of the joys of spring, Tra-la.

 

Men in prison frequently have sex with each other, but they wouldn't say they were gay. The active partner is using a substitute whereas the passive partner is either forced, or agrees to it for protection.

 

And that's why so many unfortunate mentally-ill 'inmates' commit suicide in prisons too. But 'in prisons' or anywhere, it's absolutely stomach-churning.

 

This is not even compareble to the question being discussed. We are discussing consensual sex between two men. A man raping another man does not mean the victim is homosexual and, as a matter of fact, it does not even mean the perpetrator is homosexual either.

A man who voluntarily has intercourse with a consenting man means both parties are gay. Calling it anything else is deluded. "MSM", oh, please.

 

See post #2

 

See post #4.

 

Again you ignore the fact that your orientation is about what you are attracted to, not what you are willing to do. Just because one is not turned off by homosexual activity, does not mean that they will not voluntarily do so, for reasons they agree with. Such as monetary compensation. One can be gay because they are attracted to the same sex, but can still remain caste/celibate. action=/=orientation.