Grand Jury Charges 1 in Breonna Taylor Case

And what would those be? You said I'm wrong but didn't make your case.

 

Yeah and not the side of the defendants ....ie the police officers...defendants dont testify at Grand Juries...it's also why her BF didn't testify because of potentially opening themselves up to criminal liablity

 

How completely unsurprising some people are trying to make money from this:

 

Thanks for proving my point

 

i didn’t realize your point was that he took the 5th

 

Again, thanks for proving my point

 

How do you take the 5th when your not called ?

 

Grand Jury's don't give testimony. They receive it. And yes, one sided testimony, from a DA that was trying to get the officers charged with murder. Defense (in this case the officers) has no say in a grand jury case.

To answer your question of why did Kenneth call the police if they announced? Quite easy to answer. Maybe he didn't hear them when they announced. Just because the police announce, doesn't mean that its heard. Its that simple. No need for conspiracy theories. Occam's Razor is enough. And there isn't just officers words that they announced. There was a neighbor that witnessed and heard the announcement.

 

by telling the AG before hand. i plan on taking the 5th and those not being called.

someone in his position would have been foolish too since he had criminal exposure. same with the officers involved

 

That is when Riots and Looting force the city to create a scapegoat.

 

They blew twelve million to appease the mobs and got even more riots. Not to mention undermining their own credibility, not only with law enforcement and the citizens, but with the hoodlums as well.

 

I never said the grand jury gave testimony ? Testimony “from a Grand Jury” IS testimony from witness. WTF are you on about ?

And thanks for proving my point. A grand jury is a one sided affair.

So a neighbor heard them announce, but not the guy on the other side of the door who they were yelling it at ? He had time to call the police, and during that time they didn’t announce again ? It doesnt pass the smell test

 

Tell us about this other guy since you seem to know the answers?

 

Your the ones making the accusations. Without even reading the transcripts it doesnt pass the smell test.

Your telling me the police announced, even tho they went to a judge to get a no-knock warrant and used that warrant to enter the house ?

 

No what we're doing is telling you the evidence as it's known today. We'll all get to see it during the trial. Somehow someway you seem to have evidence that we haven't seen.

 

Nobody here is telling you that...the eyewitness that was there is telling you that.

Having a no-knock warrant merely gives the police the abilty to do it, doesn't mean they have to.

 

Your point means nothing. The DA was trying to get murder convictions. They do not have to give any sort of evidence that might exculpate the person that they are charging with a crime. All that they have to do is give enough evidence to convince a grand jury that there is reason enough for the charges presented to go to a jury trial.

For all you know that neighbor had a window open or was outside at the time of the raid. Occam's Razor. All that you're doing is looking for reasons to disbelieve. Refusing to accept a grand jury verdict because the "DA and cops are perpetrating some kind of conspiracy and didn't do their jobs because of "racism" #BLM!". And no, you didn't say that directly. But "conspiracy" is usually what is meant by "smells fishy".

 

no, I'm telling you the "evidence" today doesn't make sense. I AM using what is available today

 

Again, they are going thru the extra steps and proof requirements to get a no knock, and then they didnt use it ?

 

Right....Twisting to find a different result is what your doing. FACT Cop had a legal warrant, who cares if they knocked or not let's deal with reality. The couple was standing in the hall waiting for them to enter and cop 1 was shot as soon as he walked in and the cops returned fire. The semantics are mental gymnastics for those that are trying to offset the fact that the boyfriend SHOT A COP THAT RESULTED IN HER DEATH when they returned fire.

 

sure. according to the eye witness.

even the BF says he heard the knock part

 

OK Mr 2A.

Ex1: Your sitting at home and someone breaks into your house and you shoot them. They die, are you guilty of murder ?

Ex:2 our sitting at home and someone breaks into your house and you shoot them. It turns out to be a cop who didnt knock, didn't identify, because he had a no knock warrant and just broke down your door. Are you guilty of murder just because it was a cop ?

 

Apparently nothing has changed since since the 1960s:

 

I think they were praying that paying $12 million would quell riots but the DNC, Soros and Antifa intended to create chaos at all costs. It was a no win situation no matter what.

Now, you cannot throw Murder charges at a Cop doing what he is told then returning fire after getting shot. I think anyone on earth will defend oneself when your life is in danger. Just human nature.

 

So much has changed it isn't even funny. The world is infinitely different unless people tend to utilize single incidents to portray an entire nation in order to promote their personal agenda.