How fast can skeptics prove that most of Flight 93 buried?

Didn't the mods already close your other threads for the same childish antics you're pulling now? You've been presented with the evidence. You claim everyone involved is lying, yet you have not produced a single shred of evidence to back up your claim. So why are we suppose to believe YOU over everyone else who was there? What kind of authority are you on the subject?

 

http://www.firehouse.com/news/news/pennsylvania-firefighters-share-bond-flight-93-families

All photos, witnesses and subsequent evidence corroborates this account right here.

Or were all the first responders 'in on it' before the FBI arrived on scene?

 

Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11255/1174104-455-0.stm#ixzz1h17sR3OT

 

Suede has already made it clear anyone and everyone who claims the plane was buried and was there to witness it is lying. He has yet to produce the evidence that proves these good people are lying.

 

in 1947 two ships blew up in our port,one anchor from one of the ships was thrown 2-1/2 miles.....since I wasn't there to see it, it must be a lie, using suede's logic.

 

You did, indeed make a wild, unsubstantiated claim about me. There is no 'might be' about it: you did.

Can you produce evidence for your claim, or will you apologize? Either way, and we can 'move forward'.

 

I've provided him a place where he can deposit his evidence that the plane was planted in Shanksville.

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/222805-prove-united-93-planted.html

 

Yep, nothing. That's what we've been trying to tell you guys!

Thanks for quoting an official stating the "plane buried" claim!

Um, closed up?!? What he mean by that?

 

I think they closed it cause of your guy's behavior.

Post a link, or retract your lie.

Not "everyone." That's a lie by you.

Another lie.

Maybe because:

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...ly-lacking-flight-93-mostly-buried-claim.html

Plus this thread is already at 4 pages and your skeptics haven't been do what the thread asks, so...

Cause I'm logical and have common sense.

 

Well if they are lying, they aren't good people. Duh!

 

Exactly what did I say are you contesting?

 

You forgot already?

 

You should reread what Cennyd wrote.

 

No. Which part exactly of what I said are you contesting?

 

Sounded like he was talking to you guys and ironic you bring it up since you took a little vacation the other week for the very said things!

So Fangbeer,

How fast can you prove that most of Flight 93 buried?

 

The entire claim.

 

Do you have photos and/or video of the Shanksville scene given to you by some of the Shanks scene workers?

 

Back up your claim or apologize for making it, then we can move on to your questions.

 

How fast can skeptics prove that most of Flight 93 buried?

 

It takes exactly as fast as anyone genuinely seeking evidence to contact the people who were there, on the scene.

Those sources have been provided several times. Go directly to the evidence, don't wait for it to come to you.

 

So prove they are lying. Until you do so, they are good people despite your mockery of what they did. What... you think everyone is just going to believe you based on your "credibility"? That's a laugh!

 

Wow. What a load of bull(*)(*)(*)(*). Still running from the fact you have to prove everyone involved was lying before your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claim stands a chance? Yes. Yes you are. Keep up the good work! Nothing destroys truthers' credibility more than the fact they can't back up their claims! See, you've been presented with evidence. Your entire comeback is "they were lying". Have you proven that? Nope. The onus is on you. Now run away like always.

 

How fast can skeptics prove that most of Flight 93 buried?

 

It takes exactly as fast as anyone genuinely seeking evidence to contact the people who were there, on the scene.

Those sources have been provided several times. Go directly to the evidence, don't wait for it to come to you.

 

Deja vu

All over again.