How is that transgender bathroom romp going for Radical Rightys?

Like so many pie in the sky rants, the right has failed to succeed, Why am I not surprised, they are Losers.

One month after taking effect, California's new law allowing transgender students to use facilities and participate in programs that match their gender identities hasn't given rise to the horror stories predicted by the right-wing media, according to school officials around the state.

On August 12, Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown signed the School Success and Opportunity Act, extending to transgender students statewide rights that had already been recognized by large school districts like Los Angeles Unified School District. The passage of the law, which took effect on January 1, catalyzed a conservative misinformation campaign featuring the false claims that transphobic bullying is "not a big problem," that the law would allow bathroom "free-for-alls" with students exploiting the law to use opposite-sex restrooms, and that harassment would spike in restrooms and locker rooms.

In an interview with Equality Matters, Dr. Judy Chiasson, Los Angeles' program coordinator for Human Relations, Diversity and Equity, said that after nine years of implementing trans-affirmative policies, Los Angeles schools haven't experienced any of the problems predicted by right-wing critics of the law.

"We have had no incidents of anybody pretending to be transgender," Chiasson said.

And while the discredited Pacific Justice Institute - which invented a story about a transgender female harassing her peers in a Colorado high school restroom - has sought to stoke parental opposition to transgender rights, Chiasson said that Los Angeles' protections have been cheered by parents.

A far-right coalition has gathered signatures in an effort to place the law up for a vote in the November elections. Last November, the coalition submitted over 600,000 signatures in support of a referendum. If 504,760 of those signatures are deemed valid, the law will be suspended pending the outcome of the November vote. But an initial random count found only 482,582 of the signatures valid.

http://equalitymatters.org/blog/201401310002

 

People will sign anything so the righties should have been able to get 1 million signatures without breaking a sweat.

 

While the GOP is busy thoroughly screwing everybody and screwing everything up, the conservatives and neoconservatives sit silent. But when the majority finally decide the Republicans have done enough damage, the right wing's leaders get the conservatives and neoconservatives all stirred up with tall tales of doom. After swallowing this BS, the right-wingers run in circles screaming the sky is falling.

This current session of conservative/neoconservative hysteria began in November 2008, and hasn’t slowed. With the Tea Party stirring the pot, the extreme right wing is helping the entire GOP come unhinged.

 

Lol, why is it that we have so many left wingers on this forum that focus their lives on reading about the fringe of the far right? Not even the far right, the fringe of the far right.

Here's the problem Banchie, and based on past experience I don't expect you to even try to come up with a real answer, but here it goes:

The new law didn't allow for anyone to choose which bathroom they go to, it allowed for certain people to choose if they want to use male or female bathrooms. Now, since it didn't challenge the rule that males and females have to use segregated facilities (the female ones are always better BTW), its supporters like yourself must believe that segregating facilities based on gender is a good thing, and done for a good reason. Now explain this: why are facilities gender segregated, why is that a good thing, and why does allowing some people to pick and choose NOT violate that good reasoning for segregating facilities based on gender?

 

Are they going to have stand up urinals now in the women's bathroom? Now we have to play into the delusions of people brought on by their disorder and live in fantasy world out of tolerance. Crazy stuff.

Within a decade they will call you a bigot if you are against having trans ops paid for by the taxpayer or through the mandated insurance pool.

 

Too late:

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/ob...axpayer-funded-sex-change-operations-to-obama

Since 1981, federal law has barred federal tax dollars from paying for "transsexual surgery" through programs like Medicare and Medicaid. On December 2, the HHS Department's appeals board decided that the “National Coverage Determination” should be reconsidered, opening the door to taxpayer-funded sex-change operations.

Medici adds that Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, conventionally known as ObamaCare, no longer explicitly states that the federal subsidies will not require coverage for transgender-related surgeries.


How is that "them being gay doesn't effect me at all" going for ya'll? Idiots.

 

The law isn't in effect and the initial signature count was high enough to bring about a full signature count, which is still being conducted. Counties that have finished the full signature count exceed the percentage threshold needed to have a referendum on the law. I'm not sure where you got this story from or what the date was but it's wrong about everything.

Edit: Also, gloating that nothing bad happened after 1 month of partial enforcement is pretty ridiculous. 1 month is not a very long time and most California schools have not attempted to apply the law since, again, it's not in effect because your source is wrong about the signature count.

 

And I can't wait until the young boys figure out they can do this:

http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/08...s-to-use-opposite-sex-bathrooms-locker-rooms/

The weird case of ABC newsman Don Ennis only helps to prove my point. In May, Ennis showed up for work at ABC wearing a black dress and wig. He announced to his co-workers that he was a transgender and insisted on going by the name of Dawn. During that time, he used the ladies facilities at the news center and carried on as if he were a woman.

Now, Ennis is sporting his bald pate, wearing a men’s suit and once again answering to the name of Don. He claims he experienced a bout of transient global amnesia that caused him to believe it was 1999 and that he was a woman. According to Ennis, his mother gave him female hormones when he was younger and that those hormones are responsible for him growing breasts and for his episode.

Ennis sent an email out to his colleagues saying:

“I am writing to let you know I’m changing my name . . . to Don Ennis. That will be my name again, now and forever. And it appears I’m not transgender after all.”

“I have retained the much different mind-set I had in 1999: I am now totally, completely, unabashedly male in my mind, despite my physical attributes.”

“I’m asking all of you who accepted me as a transgender to now understand: I was misdiagnosed.”

“I am already using the men’s room and dressing accordingly.”

Yes, he’s once again using the men’s room as he should have been all along. Now imagine a junior or senior high school boy who just wants the thrill of looking at your daughters in the bathroom, locker room or shower, so he suddenly claims to be transgender. For a week, month or longer, he dresses like a girl, just so he can satisfy his lustful voyeuristic cravings. When he’s had enough or tired of acting like a girl, he claims it was some form of transient global amnesia or any other excuse and that he’s come to his senses and realizes that he’s a boy after all.

In the meantime, the girls in the school have had their privacy and modesty violated by a pervert because other perverts have paved the way for him to legally do so. I wonder how the women in the ladies room at ABC felt when Ennis intruded into their privacy? How would you as a parent feel knowing that this, and possibly more could happen to your daughter? Do you want your daughters to have a naked boy parading around in front of them and joining them in the showers at school?


Homosexuals make this world such a better place... don't you think?

 

Also, there's nothing radical or far-right about expecting bathrooms to be separated by gender. The entire world does and always has done it that way up until some liberals realized that they could use mentally disturbed homosexuals as a political football by trying to get them into the ladies' room or vice versa.

 

Guys arent going to go in the girls bathroom to peep because of this except maybe a few exceptional perverts. But where does it end? Where does reality kick in over fantasy? For example, now women's bathrooms will have men in them. Now we have a man who is beating the (*)(*)(*)(*) out of women in MMA fighting. A man is competing for miss America. How long before your bigot if you don't think men should be able to compete on the women's Olympic teams?

 

Have you ever met a 13-18 year old boy? They're all exceptional perverts.

I mean hell, they don't even have to dress up like a girl. Just inform the administration that they're a girl trapped in a boys body and that really he's a butch lesbian on the inside. Still can dress just like he always has but has every right to go into the girls locker rooms and bathrooms.

 

They don't go looking for poo shots. The vast majority have the self restraint without laws not to sexually assault or peep.

 

What does that have to do with going to the girls locker room before and after gym class?

Guys try to peep in there all the time. What makes you think some of them won't go the extra mile? Hope they don't have a smartphone with a camera with them.

Go to any porn site and type in "hidden" and you will find a plethora of videos of people being filmed in a locker rooms and bathrooms. You think those people are stupid enough not to realize the golden ticket they've just been handed?

Glad I don't have a daughter that I have to worry about. Though I feel bad for those who do.