How many people are you willing to kill

Lets just cut through the BS and get right down to the real question for the people who want "assault weapon" bans (which are according to the legislation, bans on semi-auto magazine fed rifles, magazine fed shotguns, plus some other rifles and shotguns):

How many people are you willing to kill in order to disarm America?

Californian Eric Stallwell has been asked this several times but has not answered.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kur...o-shed-to-disarm-patriotic-americans-n2537012

My question for Congressjerk Eric Swalwell is pretty simple: “How many Americans would you murder to achieve your goal of disarming us?”
​

Its a certainty that some people will fight back. There will be a fight. Everyone knows it.

When New York enacted the post Sandy Hook gun registrations and bans, about 5% of the gun owners complied, meaning more than 950,000 people did not obey.
https://hudsonvalleyone.com/2016/07/07/massive-noncompliance-with-safe-act/
https://www.nydailynews.com/news/po...s-registry-numbers-released-article-1.2267730

Connecticut was little better. Same with Denver. People refuse to obey the gun registration and magazine bans, and "assault weapon" bans.restrictions.

Historically, about 3% of the people will actually take up arms and fight back. For the population of people owning "assault weapons", thats between 200,000 and 2,000,000 people.

So how many are you willing to kill to enforce your gun ban?

Remember, in the USA there are normally less than 100 killed annually by mass shooters.

There are about 15,000 total homicides annually, only a few 100 are from rifles and shotguns.

You will have to kill more than have been killed by all the mass shooters.

You will have to kill more than the annual homicide rate.

How many will you agree to kill?

 

Some people (congressmen) are willing to use nukes.

 

I wouldn't expect them to exist very long after they gave such orders

 

We're all just violent criminals who havn't shot up a school yet. I don't think the banners will shed tears over those who die fighting for our rights.

 

If they came for your guns you would put your hands on your head and say yes sir. Stop being so dramatic.

 

If they showed up at my door, I probably would.

But that would only work if they came to my house first. Where I live, by the time they got to the next house, there'd be an armed crowd to contend with, and unless they do come to my house first, I'll either be in the crowd, or covering it from an elevated position.

So long as this remains true, they won't be coming to my or anyone around here's house to take any guns.

 

They do already

 

You assume everyone is as docile as you. You err.

 

EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM. Sovereign Citizens. Those that fight violently against rule of law, are CRIMINALS.

And as most of you right wingers said about Trayvon, although bogus, kill them now before they kill for real.

 

You will die if you dont.

Your call. Lol

 

They cant take guns they have no record of. lol

 

Not door to door. Not anywhere near here.

 

A simple notification, that you have been informed, and any guns found not reported, will go double penalty will do the trick.

 

I didn't think any of the banners would actually admit it. I have to commend your honesty at least...

 

I doubt he's willing to actually go kill an armed someone.

 

Then why aren't criminals turning in the guns now?

 

You can always dream I call my guns, MY guns because that is what they are and that is what they shall stay.

 

I am NOT for mass confiscation. BUT, if the people decide, then they decide. That is it. I am FOR gun REASONABLE RIGHTS. I am even for concealed carry in calif. if in danger.

But if you threaten to kill all those that tell you what the PEOPLE have decided, YOU NEED TO DIE. YOU ARE A CRIMINAL.

 

Go get them, cowboy.

 

Of course not They'll send ppl with guns do it. Then prolly disarm them when they're done.

 

Those pus rockets aren't willing to kill anyone with their own hands

 

So you support unlimited democracy.

What if The People decide to relegalize slavery?

 

How many people have Big Governments killed after disarming their people?

Do the math.

 

Then I would cite the Constitution. A constitutional test would precede all such edicts.

 

Which is why the Toomey/Manchin background check (gun registration) bill failed.
Governments are never trustworthy.