She is the stronger party. It is normal for Democrats to pretend they favor the weaker, workers, low incomes, etc. But in this case they argue against the weakest of all, the unborn. They feel using a term like ZEF masks their true intent.
I take it by attempting distraction rather than answering you DO feel the ZEF, fetus, baby....whatever is more worthy of the freedom you call for than the mother. Thus is the radical label used.
Show me your evidence Robert. Show me why this shouldn't be in the religious forum instead of the science forum. Show me evidence that if you remove a brain from a body and keep the body alive, it's a person.
Oh good grief, talk about taking a walk on the wild side. Crime in general is a matter of law and courts decide. How did this become religious? I am not in the habit of proving your claims.
I told you why. Religion is the only defense of your argument and I showed why. You said convince you. There is no way to counter irrational faith-based beliefs with logic or science. And you have demonstrated that.
OK, both of my daughters from the moment my wives told me they were pregnant, never talked of our daughters as were they brains. What we did discuss is proper doctors care for both of them and procedures used to protect the babies in the womb. In particular my last wife was so delighted she wanted even more children. Told me pregnancy was a blessing and she was so pleased with her children. She had 4 by 2 other men she had also married. She loved all equally. In her case she went to church weekly. I never joined her church. I never was told in my own church to abort children. As a story, totally true ..l. try to keep it short. Poster was on AOL and in high school. She later graduated high school with very good grades and graduated from the University of TX. She was working for a FOX affiliate last I heard. Her short story. She was in her mom's womb on the way for an abortion. Mom had a sudden change of heart and put her daughter up for adoption. Child grew up and learned of her adoption. With her adopted mom's blessing, she wanted to contact her birth mom. When she was successful and they met, both were joyful. The end result is the baby is no plague. The women are physically properly created by nature to bear children. This nonsense the women are harmed by their own children is not the case except in extremely rare times. We might claim in fact that many of the unborn are harmed by their mom, not the other way around.
I do not accept your claim it is religious. What is irrational is for you to mention religion though I never had.
No, you want to replace that law with a law that is far broader and far more invasive. Suggesting your way is "less law" is a bald faced lie.
Unless the woman in question was specifically seeking to conceive a child, then it’s coming into existence was incidental.
