If I get my GF pregnant...Can I or should I tell her to get an Abortion?

Calling abortion "reproductive choice" is like calling slavery "property rights." Rationalize it however it makes you comfortable, but words do not change actions and you are still killing a child. And somewhere inside, you know it. You just don't care.

 

None of us want rape to be permitted, so we are all for that.

This group appears to be a fraud though.

 

Good message....every bit, true.

 

And making that comparison it entirely devoid of intelligent reasoning and motivated by nothing other than religious zealotry. I find it hilarious that the religious nut jobs love the irrelevant slavery comparisons to abortion, especially in the light of NOTHING in scriptures being said against slavery.

It is not a matter of comfort but one of facts and fetuses are still not children. I suspect you know that but can't muster the courage to contradict your religious dogma.

 

The issue of slavery WAS property rights for many, for others it was human rights. Calling abortion "killing a child" is simply rationalizing your point of view. It makes you angry for women to have reproductive choice so you would like to call it something degrading. And somewhere inside, you know it...

 

Well the analogy was based on sound logic, which explains why you simply cannot understand it.

 

LoL
lol
lOl

 

Well you and your ilk all know you are lying to justify at will homicide of children in utero.

Read up on slavery. You seem to know nothing about the fight to end it. It was all about property rights for those who defended it. Those people are the equivalent of the pro abortion types here and use the same tactic, dehumanizing the victims.

 

Sweetheart, you're going to have to do better than that. All you've really said here is, "I know you are but what am I." Let's take a look at your post, shall we?

According to your own analogy here about slavery, the issue of abortion IS about the right to life from the pro-life side and it's simply about something else from the pro-abortion side. Which means that by your own admission, pro-life = pro-life, not anti-woman. - a self-defeating argument

You then go on to accuse me of "rationalizing my point of view" and then turn right back around and rationalize your own point of view by accusing me of being "angry with women for having reproductive choice" (which you have just proven isn't true).

You're contradicting yourself all over the place here. I'm not sure you even know what you believe. I think you're just determined to get the last word in by any means necessary. It doesn't even matter if it makes any sense.

 

Pro-lifers don't really believe abortion is "killing a child," or they would demand the same punishment for aborting women that real murderers get.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk6t_tdOkwo"]Libertyville Abortion Demonstration - YouTube[/ame]

 

*shrug* Sure. You have a right to tell her whatever you like. She also has a right to tell you whatever she likes and depending on how you present your suggestion, you might get quite an earful.

 

I won't speak for anyone else, but personally I do believe women who have abortions should be treated the same way as murderers. Because they are. In fact, they are murderers of the worst kind. They are not only murdering a child (which is capital murder in the eyes of the law and punishable by the death penalty in some states) but they are murdering THEIR OWN child. That is about the lowest, most vile act that anyone can commit.

 

I wish pro aborts had as much compassion for the unborn as they do for murderers and rapists.

 

No, you gave up any options when you knocked her up

 

It's true.

The mentality behind abortion is the exact same mentality that was behind slavery and the Holocaust. It is absolutely no different at all. They used to be called “(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s.” Then they were called "untermensch." Now they’re called “fetuses.” It’s just whatever the popular term of the era is for a chosen group that certain malicious people want to dehumanized based on an ever-changing, completely arbitrary definition of what is considered a “person.” Before they were "not people" because they weren’t white. Then it was because they were Jewish. Now it’s because they’re not finished growing yet. And it will be something else 200 years from now that will be every bit as shallow and superficial. These people never learn from history. They just keep doing the same evil (*)(*)(*)(*) over and over again. The target group changes, but the behavior is always the same. Good job, humans. For all of your technological advances, you are still extremely primitive in your behavior.

 

Like I said on another thread, you have no scientific or theological basis for your equation of unborn and born children. You would condemn aborting women to imprisonment or death based on your OPINION only.

 

No cerebral cortex....no rights!....and those in vegetative states should have thier plugs pulled if the family wants to.

 

The mentality behind eating animals is the exact same mentality that was behind slavery and the Holocaust and abortion. It is absolutely no different at all. They used to be called “(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s.” Then they were called "untermensch" and "fetuses". Now they’re called “animals.” It’s just whatever the popular term of the era is for a chosen group that certain malicious people want to kill based on an ever-changing, completely arbitrary definition of what is considered a “person.” Before they were "not persons" because they weren’t white. Then it was because they were Jewish. Now it’s because they dont have certain order of nucleobases in the DNA. And it will be something else 200 years from now that will be every bit as shallow and superficial. These people never learn from history. They just keep doing the same evil (*)(*)(*)(*) over and over again. The target group changes, but the behavior is always the same. Good job, humans. For all of your technological advances, you are still extremely primitive in your behavior.

 

The point is, we simply have to draw the line somewhere. We cannot give rights to all life.
Why should granting rights based on having human DNA be better than granting rights based on the presence of mind?

 

You heard him, open season on leftists!

 

OK then, lets just recognize rights for every Human Being's life.

 

No, I have a better idea. Lets just recognize right for every human MIND's existence.

 

Nope, because that is FAR too subjective a criteria.

 

The post I responded to did not have the words "open season on leftists"....are you threatening me with violence?....just like those Christian extremist terrorists in Tallahassee did?

 

The post I responded to did not have the words "open season on leftists"....are you threatening me with violence?....just like those Christian extremist terrorists in Tallahassee do?