If Trump is right...

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by JGG, Jun 13, 2016.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. JGG

    JGG Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Messages:
    712
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    18
    My apologies. Do you think that the people who hired him so that he had an income to buy a glock and AR15 are also complicit in the massacre? Would you agree that the best way to avoid terrorist attacks is to keep the citizenry too poor to purchase firearms?
     
  2. JGG

    JGG Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Messages:
    712
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    18
    That might be true. Does that make Obama complicit?

    I can't really watch videos where I am right now, but I'm sure it's really funny. Especially if there's cats in it.

    Do you think there's something wrong with asking questions when people make claims? If someone gives me an answer I don't follow, or doesn't seem to make sense, I should just nod and accept it? Is that what you would do?
     
  3. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    what i think is my own situation, not his..
    he has his own idea of what he personally wanted to do with his money so why would the company be at fault? but the company keep him employee thus that gave the nut case /sleeper CELL extra income..

    no best way to really avoid a attack.. yes it could in this one event, because he was on a set income and had little to no friends as he was a LONE wolf others have friends that will give them guns bombs etc to do the act..
     
  4. SiNNiK

    SiNNiK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2014
    Messages:
    10,432
    Likes Received:
    4,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It is what I do constantly on this site. The anti gun folks have not made sense even once, so I just nod and let it rest. However, it certainly doesn't mean you have to accept it and the exchange is not in vain, it serves to remind me how fruitless the pursuit of reasonable discourse is on this forum.
     
  5. JGG

    JGG Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Messages:
    712
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    18
    That's not the question. Read again: Do you think that the people who hired him so that he had an income to buy a glock and AR15 are also complicit in the massacre?

    So that the company hired him on in the first place in order to provide him with an income, to buy the weapons, is okay. The problem, as you're explaining to me, is that they did not fire him, thus allowing him to continue to maintain income to buy the weapons?

    Okay. Would it prevent terrorist attacks if we did not allow people who are not politically correct to purchase weapons? Would it prevent terrorist attacks if people who were not politically correct were unable to find employment?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Amen to that. And yet, for some reason, I try...
     

Share This Page