If you like Bush or Romney then you like Obama as well.

Did I even once say that we should elect them? I did say Paul is better than the other two idiots but as a member of one of the two parties, he does end up supporting those idiots and the ones before him.

 

he works within the system. He didn't create it.

 

The system designed to be corrupt which ny joining, he puts his seal of approval on.

 

It's either join the system or be run over by it.

 

Martin Luther King would disagree with you.

 

he is dead

 

Oh please spare me that idealistic crap. Protest is part of the system, just don't get mad when the system doesn't bow to your whim because the democratic will of the people cannot be swayed to your side.

 

So he can not serve as an example?

Protest is part of change.

 

yep yep and yep.gives standing ovation.some people here just dont get it that noting will change that just like those three monsters,romney is a monster is well just here to serve and further the agenda of the new world order.paul is the only one not willing to carry out their plan.

 

gives standing ovation.yep like I said,he does no research whatsoever.Pauls actions show he is the only one who wants to serve us instead of wall street.yet some people here STILL think Romney will make a difference. He should pick up his book THE REVOLUTION and read it.once you read his book,you understand why he is different than the other republicrats and demopublicans,Bush,Romney,Clinton and Obama. Like you said,he backs up what he says with his actions .None of those other candidates do.Romney has earned the nickname FLIP FLOP with very good reason.

 

yep guess some people enjoy living in a police state and having our civil liberitys and rights trampled on and taken away from in every election.

 

could not have said it better myself.

 

thats not true at all.While Gingrich and santorium have said they would give Romney their delegates since they are out of the race.Paul has said that if he does not get the nomination,he wont give his delegates to Romney since he is part of the NWO that Paul doesnt want anything to do with.

Paul is a RINO because while serving as a republican in the Reagan administration,he found out how corrupt they really are in washington and got out of it.He wanted nothing to do with them.He got out and ran as an independent in congress for most his life cause he saw first hand how both parties are corrupt.He is only running on the republican ticket because the independent never wins.since he had to get on one of the tickets,he picked the party that he was originally running on before.

Paul says in his boook that people like myself who call the republicans the republicrats and the democrats the demopublicans are exactly right and that were right that there is no difference between the two partys.obama,clinton,Bush and Romney,NONE of them will EVER say that and none of them have ever run on the independet ticket like paul did while in congress.wakey wakey to people who think paul wont make a difference.better get your head out of the sand buriend with that ostrich.

 

and ROMNEY will do NONE of this just like Obama wont.People dont get it that Romney when he gets in,will be even worse than Obama is.Not because he is more evil but because he is a willing puppet for the establishment who is ruining america and he will do what THEY tell him to do because he will be willing to serve their agenda.

a better example is Clinton did worse than even Bush sr did while in office amazingly.I did not think that was possible because the Bush family is the most corrupt crime family ever.But he was worse than him not because he is more evil than his pal Bush,but because he was serving the establishment instead of us and doing what they told him to do.

 

You don't want a president you want a king for only a king would have the power to do all that you want. And Ron Paul wouldn't do any of that stuff neither because congress would fight him tooth and nail at every turn and impeach his ass.

 

Get rid of the welfare state.
Get rid of all the alphabet agencies that have been formed over the last 80 years.
Get rid of the stupid war on drugs.
Get rid of the income tax.
Get rid of the capital gains tax.
Get rid of the unlearnable labyrinth of tens of thousands of regulations.
Stop taking money from Americans and giving it to foreign nations.


This is my list, not Ron Paul's. Paul's list is very modest compared to this one. You don't want what Republicans have always said they stand for, no Republican does. If the Republican party has to rely on the media to select its candidate for it, it is no longer relevant. If the Republican party thinks it has to nominate a candidate whom is indistinguishable from a communist, just to win an election, then the Republican party is no longer relevant.
WAKE UP! THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS IRRELEVANT!

 

If you get rid of all welfare you will have people living and dying in the streets. You will have folks who would otherwise be barely making it committing crimes so they can go to jail because it's the only way they can find food to eat.

If you get rid of all regulations then we'll have arsenic in milk being sold on the side of the street by homeless people who have no other way of making money. We will become like Cambodia and Thailand where you never know whether or not how much filler your getting in each perscription vs how much medication because the quality control will vary from pharmaceutical to pharmaceutical. We'd have total anarchy.

I understand the concept of who owns my body. But to make all drugs legal would be disastrous. For example selling Meth legally would mean anyone who wants a dose can get one and this stuff gets you hooked on the very first dose. I predict over 60% of our population would become drug addicts of one form or another if drugs were completely legal.

And then who will pay the bills. Who will build the highways. Who will provide an armed militia to defend this country. I know privatize everything. You really want us to be like the third world countries where the poor die in the streets?


I don't want to live in a country where everyone has to carry a gun and the rich have to have and armed posse around them at all times just to go buy a loaf of bread. You would be taking opportunity away from the lower classes and giving them nothing but dirt to eat unless they turn to crime. The world you want to live sucks for everyone who isn't rich enough to buy their own army.

 

Those who think like you are the ones who are irrelevant. You think people would actually vote for this. Time to wake up, find yourself and island somewhere and arm yourself up so you can have the life of pure Darwinism that you desire.


You know what You are so extreme you make the liberals look good. People like you is why the Democrats win elections, because voters are terrified of you folks gaining control. Up till now the only people I've put on ignore have been white supremacists. Now I'm adding irrational extremists who don't know how to have a rational argument.

 

The vast majority of American support of minimal safety net. You are way outnumbered on that one.

No. Some actually provide valuable services and perform necessary watchdog functions.

The majority of Americans don't want to.

What are we going to fund the government with? Protectionist tarriffs? Sorry buddy that way of funding government died over a century ago and it is antithetical to globalized free trade, which is the new trend. You can't escape it.

While I agree we need a line by line study of regulations and their effects and the abolishment of many of them, the idea that we can live in a completely unregulated economy is immature and very juvenile.

Debateable, I certainly can see the benefit of foreign aid in the form of loans and some charitable contributions in foodstuffs, etc.

No, naive, foolish and childlike libertarians like you are. America isn't interested in your brand of reductionist libertarianism. They just aren't.

It is obvious that the "Will of the People" as expressed through their democratically elected representatives means nothing to you and majority opinion means nothing to you. In short, nothing means anything to you but yourself.

These things did not just magically spring into being as a result of some conspiracy. The American People requested them, demanded them, or otherwise supported them.

 

This sums up the hysterical mantra from the left. Somehow we survived hundreds of years without it.......barely.

 

The problem is we have gone past "minimal social safety nets" instead into the idea someone's middle class status must be maintained, even if their skill level and education no longer make them economically viable to maintain that status themselves.

The left in this country expects the US Government to tax the rich in order to give not to the poor, but to the an economically unviable section of the middle class that is, rightfully I might add, losing its hold on a middle class status they shouldn't have anymore.

 

Back in the 19th century we had people dying in the streets. We had children working in sweat shops. We survived, those of us with jobs stepping over the corpses of those who didn't. It's a simple fact.

 

We need the Republicans to win because the liberals will bankrupt us trying to give everyone a handout.
But we don't need the extremists anarchist screwing things up by demanding no laws, no handouts at all.
There is a rational middle.

 

And today we still have people dying in the streets and we have children who could not work even if they were allowed to cause there are no more jobs.

Yes, I remeber seeing the bodies piled up in the streets in those old photographs in America's past. Or were those pictures of Auchwitz? I get those two mixed up all the time.

 

Yes!! What we need is another republican like "W".

Oh wait!!