Insanity

A female-to-male trans man and their “non-binary” partner have had a baby in Brighton, England — assisted by a trans doctor and a male-to-female trans woman sperm donor. For the more "enlightened" folks in this forum, please tell me how this is normal, wholesome behavior and how it makes the world a better place.

 

No taker's yet huh?.

 

The birth of that child will probably contribute nothing to making the world a better place than the birth of you or me did.

 

Depends on how one defines "better." Standardized wombs and a test tube citizenry will certainly be "better" for maintaining order and power in the dictatorships of the future. Pol Pot missed out by being born just a few generations to early, drat.

 

You ain't seen nothing yet. Now everyone can create a baby. The world must be prepared to see nontraditional things.

 

In the grand scheme of things it won't change the world one way or the other. It's just the weird news of the day.

 

I think the much more interesting story is why this bothers you so much. Why does it?

 

i'll file this under...

who cares

 

a better story will be when one of 'those' couples decide to abort their fetus...

wonder if the pro-lifers will protest them or actually agree on the abortion...

now, that'd be news worthy...

 

This is child abuse plain and simple. This freak show has sadly given birth to a child in a perverse attempt to normalize their mental illness. This child will spend it's life living in a society that will reject them, this child growing up in such a dysfunctional home will always be in conflict about their deranged parents and the many examples in society of what a normal family is. This child will end up more ****ed up than their parents and will become a burden on society. This social experiment will be no more acceptable a hundred years from now than it is now.

 

And your qualifications for making that analysis are what?

 

Two people who love each other have created a new life. Mankind's beauty is infinite though some of us refuse to see it.

 

I would much MUCH rather be raised by them than you.

 

You know there's actual research out there regarding kids being raised by LGBTQ parents? That's been a thing for awhile now. You should read it. It would clear up some things up for you.

 

These are children we are talking about who are damned even before they are even born. The number of children in the US who have become wards of the state has increased dramatically in the last fifty years. Typically these children have been removed from abusive environments and are abuse/trauma reactive and not likely to ever recover. Typically these children bounce from foster home to foster home where in many cases they are abused and neglected until they are so damaged they end up in treatment and continue to decline and are again subjected to another cycle of failures. There is presently no long term psychiatric facilities for children because liberals shuttered them long ago. There exists no effective long term care and eventually when these children age out (21 or 22) they are released with no further support and end up homeless, in jail or dead. We live in times where a segment of our society celebrates sexual dysfunction as if it were equivalent to normal hetero sexuality.(it is not) This has produced a cornucopia of deviant, perverse orientations that are unacceptable in a civilized society as much as drug and alcohol abuse and violence is. The problem with these individuals is that they are the source of their child's lifetime failures which will have an adverse affect on others that increases exponentially as they age. We all have a responsibility to protect children and celebrating perverse lifestyles because it's trendy is perverse in itself and harmful to children. Unfortunately there are no laws that prevent these sort of things from happening but there should be. Protecting children trumps any adults rights to the pursuit of happiness and that is precedent enough to enact such laws. I sincerely hope the US eventually comes to it's senses.

 

Research published by liberal LGBTQ folks? Yeah that makes it vaild, right?

 

Research is research. We certainly didn't turn our noses up at Nazi war criminal rocket scientist research, did we?

Oh, and gay folk are what, 5% of the population? 10% tops? I doubt much of the research is coming from them.

 

Does this devalue your own life in some manner?
How do you know the home is any more dysfunctional, then some of the heterosexual households that have children?

 

Weird news to be sure, but the outrage in this thread is ridiculous. Mind your own family. Let others mind theirs.

 

Deconstruct and emulate, so as to appear or approach normal and wholesome? My my Grandma, what big teeth you have! I'll pass.

 

I'm glad to see folks finding a way to continue the species despite adopting a lifestyle previously unsuited to procreation. Here's to hoping the emotional instability these trans tend to exhibit is not transferred to the child.

 

What does any of that have to do with gay people? Like I said earlier, there just aren't that many gay people. Societal changes like the one you're talking about are the result of straight peoples' actions.

The article is about a new child coming into the world. That's not something to celebrate? Isn't your name "God and country"? Aren't you pro-life? You're assuming this kid is going to live a life of misery because they have LGBTQ parents. There are indeed challenges kids face having non-traditional parents, but it's nothing like the doom-and-gloom you're predicting. That's a wrong assumption on your part. Please, educate yourself.
https://whatweknow.inequality.corne...eing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/

I hate to break this to you, but heteros still have a lock on "deviant, perverse orientations". Do you know the kind of craziness that goes on in the bedrooms of a lot of straight households? Again, there just aren't that many gay folk around to change society significantly. If society is becoming more perverse, it's not gay people's fault.

Do you have any actual evidence? Because this just sounds like stuff you were told and never bothered to actually check on any of it.

 

Oh, yes. This is just starting. Things will get really interesting in the next 20 or 30 years.

 

mechanized procreation...

aka, cloning...

designer kids...

 

As long as no harm came to any animals in the making of this child, I'm good with it! England has so little to boast about these days let her have what they have, in the way of news todays! Besides, you never know, this might lead to a new product like Triops, just add water and wait for a baby to grow! Well unless you get cold feet and flush them like goldfish or abortionist ¯\_(º¸º)_/¯