Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Interview with Jeff Sessions confirms Prosecutor To ‘Look Into’ ObamaGate

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by icehole3, Mar 8, 2018.

Page 4 of 4
  1. icehole3

    icehole3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2017
    Messages:
    8,414
    Likes Received:
    10,869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You got that right Ole beautiful wise one.
     
    icehole3, Jun 15, 2018
    #76
  2. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,966
    Likes Received:
    37,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Too busy working on a care package for Paulie Walnuts?
     
    The Mello Guy, Jun 15, 2018
    #77
  3. icehole3

    icehole3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2017
    Messages:
    8,414
    Likes Received:
    10,869
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yeah sure.
     
    icehole3, Jun 15, 2018
    #78
  4. Yulee

    Yulee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    10,341
    Likes Received:
    6,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just stating facts. No sweat off my back.
     
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2018
    Yulee, Jun 15, 2018
    #79
  5. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,084
    Likes Received:
    51,767
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's a big card:

    [​IMG]
    David French

    ✔@DavidAFrench
    Yup, and the “gross negligence” legal analysis — as applied to these facts — is extraordinary. She violated the law. Period.

    Stephen Hayes

    ✔@stephenfhayes

    On Clinton and classification, FBI/DOJ officials "found her claim that she did not understand the significance of the '(C)' marking strained credulity." Inconceivable that she did not understand. https://twitter.com/jabeale/status/1007334702515093504 …

    12:47 PM - Jun 14, 2018

    [​IMG]
    David French

    ✔@DavidAFrench
    The defense that Strzok didn’t actually stop Trump isn’t all that relevant to the problem of intent. There is more than enough reason to terminate him and place every single one of his actions under the highest degree of scrutiny. Transparency is absolutely vital.

    10:36 AM - Jun 14, 2018
     
    Zorro, Jun 15, 2018
    #80
  6. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,084
    Likes Received:
    51,767
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Zorro, Jun 15, 2018
    #81
    drluggit likes this.
  7. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,084
    Likes Received:
    51,767
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FBI AGENT WHO WANTED TO ‘STOP’ TRUMP HAS REALLY JUST HELPED HIM.

    Trump is fortunate in his political enemies. He ran against the worst possible Democratic candidate. And these revelations from Derp State Strzok are deeply threatening to the political and institutional viability of the Mueller probe itself — the very thing Democrats and left-liberals have spent the past year praying might do him in.

    Did I call him a shmuck? Strzok is the ultimate shlimazel — a Yiddish term for a clumsy oaf who trips himself up at every turn. Strzok reassured his mistress that he’d stop Trump. He didn’t do it in 2016. And he may have contributed to not stopping Trump in 2020.    ​
     
    Zorro, Jun 15, 2018
    #82
    icehole3 likes this.
Page 4 of 4

Share This Page