Discussion in 'Nuclear, Chemical & Bio Weapons' started by Eleuthera, Mar 22, 2020.
If so, how was it dispensed, and by whom?
Could be, don't know. The Red Chinese experiment on prisoners, and the bio-lab in Wuhan is also near a prison, so it's possible it got away from them there and spread. It's also possible they were planning to use it on Hong Kong to stifle the protests there as well.
A state that arrests people for thought crimes and then harvests their organs for sale around the world is pretty much capable of anything, but as long as they peddle cheap captive labor to Wall Street and global corporations we will be subjected to this sort of disaster more often, so get used to it. The Davos Set gets whatever it wants from western politicians, and they are not patriots nor do they care about real 'free trade' and 'competition', and they determine the rules the rest of us live by; with ideologues on the left and the right striving to be the first to kill the most people via assorted sociopathic methodologies thrown in to the mix the future prospects for most people is not a pretty one.
What about a state that holds journalists in prison for publishing the crimes of government? What sort of state is that? Or one that commits murder by drone?
Assange deserves prison at the least for the people he got killed, and assassinating a terrorist POS who is actively killing your soldiers and citizens and launching attacks on your allies is what a state should be doing. Thanks for asking.
Who did he get killed?
When it was found that Manning had given the material to Wikileaks, Bob Gates was Sec Def. He stated clearly on TV (I saw it) that nobody had died from what Manning released.
So I guess you concede that a state that would imprison without bail a journalist might also easily release contagion into society of its claimed enemy? I would agree.
A government that would unleash nuclear weapons against civilians would likely also unleash contagion against civilians.
Sorry, you cranks will have to find another playmate; I don't feed trolls much, especially dishonest ones.
It happened in China when a retarded bat got eaten by a retarded panda before some other retard came along and cut up and sold that retarded panda off as beef or chicken only a retard'd buy at this meat market in Wuhan and that's why everyone's got the Coronavirus now, retard.
It is just another typical "Rainforest Virus", like those that have been coming from that area of the world for thousands of years.
And nothing special when compared to the dozens we have seen come from the area in the last 20+ years. Like all the others, it is yet another SARS virus. It was only a matter of time that one spread fast enough through modern transport to become a new global pandemic.
There is absolutely zero reason to suspect that is the case and the nature of this virus would make it a terrible choice for any kind of biological weapon. This continues to be a stupid question and it has been answered clearly and concisely all the times it's already been asked so why do people insist on continue to ask it?
We're just reaping the blowback from the bad karma of dealing with such psycho states as Red China . We shouldn't be doing ANY business with such a psychotic 'government' in the first place.
They [capitalists] will furnish credits which will serve us for the support of the Communist Party in their countries and, by supplying us materials and technical equipment which we lack, will restore our military industry necessary for our future attacks against our suppliers. To put it in other words, they will work on the preparation of their own suicide. Vladimir Ilich (Ulyanov) Lenin, as reported by I. U. Annenkov in an article entitled, “Remembrances of Lenin,” Novyi Zhurnal / New Review, September 1961, p. 147.
Exactly Joe. The question has been answered by the talking heads on TV, and everybody knows they are always right and never wrong. They are recognized by the world as truth tellers and wise men.
Am I missing something? What evidence of this being a weapon is there? Can you link it? I'll be open minded
Fine, present your evidence then.
And no, making short quips like that is not evidence. It is more like the start of paranoia. Paranoia leads to Conspiracies. Conspiracies lead to Mental Illness. Mental Illness leads to the dark side.
My answer has nothing to do with "talking heads on TV", it's based on my own first hand experience, understanding and common sense. What reason can you offer to even suspect it is a man-made biological weapon?
Did you know anybody in the Chemical Corps while you were in the Army? That's what it was called when I was in, perhaps the name has changed.
Besides Fort Detrick, how many CBR labs does the Army have? What is the mission statement of that command?
Maybe this will help: https://www.cbc.ccdc.army.mil/
In your time in the Army did you ever hear the term "hybrid war"?
Hoping Joe and Mushroom will see this.
Nobody has denied that there are various organisations, public and private, researching biological weapons for both defence and attack. That doesn't answer the question of what reason there is to even suspect that COVID-19 specifically is a result of a man-made biological weapon.
It is a biological weapon in the sense it was created by the planet in an effort to kill as much of the human population as possible.
And the key requirement in being able to use a biological weapon is to be able to protect your own people and soldiers from the weapon itself.
The man purpose of USAMRIID was in testing biological weapons in order to develop vaccines for them. In this way if an enemy used them against us hopefully we would already be immunized against it, and to rapidly develop a vaccine once one was discovered.
And the main research the US ever did into biological agents was bacteria. All nations know that virus are not good candidates. They can be highly deadly, spread rapidly out of control, and are both fragile during storage and delivery and are easy to mutate. And the idea of biological warfare is not to kill large numbers, but simply to incapacitate them.
Incapacitating a large number of individuals actually harms more than killing them. Releasing a worldwide pandemic is not "Biological Warfare". TO even start to make that claim, you would also have to tie to this "mystery agency" all of the other outbreaks in that area, from Swine Flu and SARS to the Avian Flu.
And the only agency that might be would be China. There was actually talk that SARS might have been an accidental release of a Chinese program, but that was dismissed over a decade ago.
It is typical Conspiracy Theory logic.
Bonnie and Clyde robbed banks. The FBI has hidden people that they claimed were dead but were really alive. Ergo, Bonnie and Clyde are being used by the FBI to rob banks today.
The more links that have to be used to validate some kind of claim, the less likely it is true. But for the CT nuts, that does not matter.
Only if you believe in the Gia Theory.
And while I do not, in many ways it does apply. Any time a species starts to get to the point they are overpopulating their environment, "nature" has had 3 ways to cull it back. Predators, famine, and disease.
Well, there are no animals evolving that kill and eat large numbers of people, so that is out. Famine we largely conquered through our shipping infrastructure. That leaves famine. The largest killer of humans for the last 2 millennia. Which many thought had been conquered, but as we are seeing nature is more productive and devious than we are.
There are reasons you are not aware of Joe. Reasons you would probably not want to be aware of. It's OK. Some of us are more curious than others.
It was created by the two-legged critters that occupy the planet. Those who build laboratories.
Yes, of course. The same gang that defoliated Vietnam would never use biowarfare. And of course the many sanctions put in place by the US around the globe are just "tough love" applied on an international scale. It doesn't matter if innocent civilians are punished, tough love must be administered.
And the same government that kills innocents by way of drones would simply never kill innocents in any other way, of course not.
Fantastic argument! Are you on the White House staff?
Separate names with a comma.