You haven’t kept up for years. While in the woman’s womb, it’s woman’s reproductive rights. and only the woman has the right to decide to carry the baby to full term. By your logic, calling it “killing a another human” being, you had better be prepared to execute the woman and the doctor for intentional premeditated murder for having an abortion in the case of incest or rape or even her health or baby’s health, or the far inebriated right should just shut the hell up. The predominately white males have no say in using the govt, to punish women for deciding what to do with their own body. Hypocrites all.
Killing ? The usual flawed logic by males trying to make a decsion for women when they have no right to. There is a privacy clause that frees women from male abuse, entrapment, dominance and slavery. Why don’t you just take away their right to vote and make your inane words have the meaning you really intend, Trumpets. Their fear of woman and all minorities is abundantly clear.
And here we are again....you managed to derail the discussion again. What does your string of posts have to do with the OP?
Based on current law, but current law change. From conception, the zygote has unique DNA and will have unique finger prints. It's destiny is to become an adult human.
So now we determine “ killing” on one’s potential. A unique DNA will determine incest and deformity too. Even in a Petri dish it’s murder ? You can’t handle the medical science and not support a woman’s right to choose. Be careful mixing DNA science and your “religion” of what life is and a woman’s right to choose. You destroy life with every step you take and every month a woman that does become pregnant after intercourse, can still spontaneously abort. . Are you going to charge her with involuntary manslaughter because a woman does not know she’s pregnant and drinks too much ( or other activity) causing a spontaneous abortion ? Your declarations are all poor when you have a false sense of what human life is. It has little to do with potential....as radiation ( and other factors ) exposure can and does alter DNA.
“Privacy laws end where murder laws begin.” Wow. So who is charged with murder when an abortion is performed on a 12 year old rape victim ?
The Ninth Amendment says that not all rights have to be listed. The RKBA is associated with service in a government regulated organization that no longer exists. The right to abortion is much more relevant in today's world.
The phrase "associated with" does not mean the right to keep and bear arms was limited exclusively to service in a government regulated organization. The second amendment did not pertain to a right to be drafted. But if the claim on the part of yourself, about the ninth amendment stating that not all rights have to be listed is factually correct, such would mean the united states constitution does not need to spell out the full scope of the second amendment. Such would mean the ninth amendment acknowledges, recognizes, and protects the right to use privately owned firearms for all legal purposes not connected to military service.
