Is this proof that White Anglo Saxon Protestants are the Superior and Civilised race?

This appears to be proof that rich white anglo saxon protestants are the superior and civilised race, and they help to civilise other races and religions out of the goodness of their own hearts when it is pragmatic to do so.

How could one possibly explain otherwise when shown this evidence?

Closing the borders to other races and religions in civilised countries is necessary, because the white man's burden is very heavy to bare.

God bless President Trump

Boys forced to rape their mothers during Congo war: UN report

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/9c7b66c4-9bd9-39b3-ad24-4f22866a38fd/ss_boys-forced-to-rape-their.html

 

Before we declare a race superior like this, we should be sure that they don't have atrocious human rights abuses themselves. In this case they really do so they really aren't superior. You knew this answer was coming right?

 

they are superior because they only inflict 'abuses' on others, not their own.

 

Wow you're ignorant of history.

 

Besides that you absolutely seem obsessed by people you perceive as "rich," what is "superior" of course has a level of subjectivity, but that the UK is one of the biggest migrant welfare tits on the planet speaks for itself and that means countless other races and religions are voting with their feet.

It's really abusive the way the British are endangering their own future ethnocultural existence by allowing hundreds of thousands of migrants onto their shores annually and putting them up in council flats.

What on earth are you crying about here other than you're mad the British notice they're better than a whole lot of other people who agree with them by their migration patterns? How dare they notice they're better than countless failed civilizations that populations are fleeing like rats off the Titanic?

What exactly would make you happy here?

 

Research the Irish in America.

 

From the point of view of which Marxist?

 

Well then that makes me half superior.

 

All groups have such in their past. Only whites are collectively blamed, smeared, expected to go along with reparations shakedowns and have an asterisk placed on their history. Only whites have their identity and history questioned and disparaged due to this. Muslims? Nope - in spite of that Muslims have historically raped a swath from Morocco to Indonesia since well before Christopher Columbus was born. Asians still celebrate Genghis Khan and nobody faults them.

No rational person can deny that whites brought superior civilization to the Americas. The Aztecs were a people who routinely sacrificed and cannibalized those sacrificed to keep the sun rising, and those sacrifices included children. Skull racks have been unearthed in the Mexico City area, and that doesn't count the oppressive colonialism the Aztecs unleashed on smaller neighboring tribes who due to that oppression welcomed alliances with the Conquistadors.

Whites also gave a number of Indian tribes written language, such as the Lakota. The wheel didn't exist in the Americas before whites got here, nor did electric power, automobiles, bicycles, trains, airplanes, space flight, eyeglasses, computers, television, radio, etc. Superior hunting and farming methods put a stop to hunting by starting wildfires or driving large herds of bison off cliffs (head-smashed-in buffalo jump) just to only kill a few for sustenance.

Indeed, what other group has invented so much we use in the modern world outside of whites?

Try getting along without what we've invented.

 

Logic 101:

Fallacy of Exclusion
A logical fallacy where "Important evidence which would undermine an inductive argument is excluded from consideration.”

Premise 1: Races that don’t commit atrocities are superior.
Premise 2: The white race doesn’t commit atrocities.
Conclusion: The white race is superior.

See your problem?

 

These horror stories were probably fabricated as part of a politically motivated press campaign. The UN report didn't back up their claims, which is why Trump doesn't trust the UN.



Bacre Waly Ndiaye is the head of a UN human rights team. Ndiaye, a lawyer from Senegal, may be as credible as an activist from Black Live Matter. I think a British team would have done a better job.

 

To your first point, this isn't fully true. Koreans have been demanding apologies from the Japanese for using many of their women as "comfort" during the last World War. They were even able to get them to compensate some of the survivors.

And no one faults Asians for celebrating Genghis Khan because they aren't imposing their way of life on anyone here. If ever Asians become more of a political factor, believe it we will hear all about Khan.

Frankly, "superiority" is subjective. What good is a "superior civilization" coming to a place near you, when they come and restrict movement, kill most of the people, destroy every trace of the culture, and breed the rest of the people out? You can talk about the sacrificial practices of the Aztecs all day. The fact is the Aztecan routine sacrifices are nothing compared to extinction they got at the hands of a "superior civilization."

Your last point makes me laugh. Many supremacists will say "we've invented" or "we've brought civilization" or "we've accomplished" some other fantastic feat. The truth is, the average supremacist is nowhere in the invention patent credits. Nowhere in the history books. Nowhere accomplishing some fantastic feat. They are just regular people who just happen to believe they are superior to others. Oh and the "we've invented" can only go so far. Try to take credit for what someone else invented and see if they don't take legal action against you, same race or not. LOL.