Islamist-related terror attack in London.

London police named 20-year-old Sudesh Amman as the attacker responsible for stabbing two people in the Streatham area of south London on Sunday.
Police earlier called the attack a terrorist incident believed to be "Islamist-related."
Amman is believed to be the man police said was wearing a "hoax device" strapped to his body who stabbed two people at Streatham High Road before armed officers shot him dead.

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/02/02/uk/london-police-shot-man-terror-intl-gbr/index.html

Europe has become a dengerous place to live

 

Actually the UK is out of the EU27 now

 

Two people stabbed and injured, the attacker shot dead (good work) and because of that Europe has now become a dangerous place. Yeah, right.

 

They need to ban the carrying of knives.
Oh, wait a minute; they did.

 

Terrorists in the US have such easy access to guns that many innocents are killed before any response is made. Here in the UK two people receive non life-threatening injuries and it makes world wide news. I think I know where I prefer to live.................

 

The world would be better off without Islam.

 

A place where everyone jockeys for the center of the herd.

 

Sorry not possible, fake news, don't you all know Islam is the religion of peace. Didn't y'all get the memo.

 

There was a knife attack in Belgium also. However, the police didn't told if it was or not an islamic terrorist attack.

European leftists will continue with their motto however "diversity is our strength" even if Europe didn't made a lot of relevant things since the end of WW2.

 

This is what you get when you elect khan

 

And yet the United Kingdom and European Union have been subjected to far more terrorist attacks, successful and otherwise, than the united states.

 

A school boy gunning down other school children is as much a terrorist attack as any other terrorist attack

 

Here in the US if someone attacks me with a knife I will shoot him, because I legally carry a gun.
In the UK I believe you are only allowed to use harsh language to defend yourselves.
I know which method of defense I fell more comfortable with.

 

They are still in Europe.

 

Simply a function of % of Muslims in a country. USA has 1%. UK has 4 and France has 8%.

As the % increases so does the Islamic terror incidents.

 

You won't be attacked with a knife, you'll be shot before you even notice anyone near you

 

Then why are not all violent crimes classified as incidents of terrorism?

 

How would an absence of legal firearms ownership ultimately serve to prevent such from occurring?

 

Because apparently, only Muslims are capable of terrorism

 

Yes but the harsh words can't be racist or sexist. These
words cannot confront the attacker, or cause anxiety.
As Oxford Uni will tell you, even clapping your hands
can cause anxiety to some.

 

He was under surveillance being followed by plain clothed police at the time. They intervened immediately.

 

This was deliberate. The UK Government and the US were informed by intelligence that an attack on Iraq would almost certainly lead to Islamic terrorism on the streets of London (and bring extremist Islam to Iraq). They continued to do this on an attack built on lies. One has to assume the US was wanting terrorism on the streets of London and an increase in Extremist Islam and that is why they conjured up lies to attack Iraq.

 

He only did half his time for terror offenses, got out on Sat and went on a stabbing spree Sun!!

wha?...

 

Would that mean I need to have a suppressor, (with all applicable permits of course) on my Glock, so the noise upon firing is reduced for those with easily offended hearing?

 

https://abcnews.go.com/US/dead-critical-condition-students-struck-car-police/story?id=68730973
Who needs guns?