Jack Ruby at Parkland Hospital

Discussion in 'JFK' started by resisting arrest, Jun 2, 2016.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Shooting the president in the head in front of everyone is quite an anomaly.
     
  2. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    3 presidents have been murdered two with headshots.

    Not an anomoly
     
  3. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why did the Warren Commission refuse to see Jack Ruby as they left him to wither in his jail cell? Even though, he was a central figure
    in the whole scheme and a nexus between the government and the underworld (oh...wait, I see why now).
     
  4. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They did not.

    He gave testimony to the warren Commission.

    Every time you repeat that lie you are ignoring fact.
    http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/ruby_j1.htm
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2017
  5. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Warren Commission is what you get when you let the perpetrates investigate the crime.
    Did Jack Ruby know that he was looking for help from the last people on earth who might give it to him?
     
  6. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    OF course you do not have any evidence at all to support your accusation.

    The Warren Commission did have evidence which destroys your argument.

    They had no reason TO help him
     
  7. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
  8. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one told him to shoot Oswald he did so on his own initiative which is what he maintained and stated to everyone he spoke with until his death.
     
  9. Cornergas

    Cornergas Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2017
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male

    Ha Ha....repeat your lies often enough and you start to believe them...oh right you obviously do
     
  10. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Uhhh…so are tornadoes in Vermont. The rarity of occurrences has nothing to do with the size of a conspiracy. The “dumbness” (no other way to put it) of the notion that the planners would use Jack Ruby is just crazy.

    For example. If you’re a member of the mob or some criminal organization, you’re a member because you earn money for them, do a service for them, or deliver some benefit. You’re not just an honorary member or some associate; you have a job. So they took this beneficial element and gave him a suicide mission to where he would be caught and cease to exist as an asset. And, before you go there, it’s not just a matter of having to “hire” someone else; you have to get someone who is comfortable living outside the law, knows (and is happy with) what cut to take, what information to falsify, etc… Its a matter of being groomed.

    Secondly, using Ruby would also be dumb based on what he may have known about the entire organization. This is why most gang bangers are usually very young, very ignorant of the organization itself, etc… so they won’t sing to the feds.

    So it makes no sense from at least two standpoints. I doubt any of these FACTS will mean much to you but they are facts and they are not in dispute.
     
  11. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What's dumb is pretending your erroneous speculations are facts. Apparently among all the other things you don't know is what constitutes a fact!
    It's a verifiable, proven thing and an objective reality....not your unfortunate opinion.

    The fact is Jack Ruby made a public statement blaming people in
    "high positions" who put him in the "position I am in" and that they would never let the "true facts be known" to the public.


    We have Jack Ruby's actual words and his many requests to talk to the Warren Commission in person....we don't need
    amateur hour guesswork by the uninformed and hopelessly biased.
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2017
  12. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Once again he did talk to the Warren Commission and after being convicted he maintained there was no conspiracy until he died.

    No evidence supports your assertions
     
  13. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I stated facts supported by evidence it is you repeating lies on a consistent basis.
     
  14. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    I noticed you didn’t try to contradict any of it…

    And gee, what do you know, a guy who commits a crime tries to rationalize it? How very unusual!!! LOL.
     
  15. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Contradict what?
    And for what purpose? :no:

    Rationalized?
    In what way? Given it a lot of thought, have you?
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2017
  16. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    The idiocy of using someone who is “made” to carry out a hit—that is why the mob has soldiers. For what purpose? To make yourself sound more intelligent.

    By providing a reason…it’s called rationalization.

    I tend to agree that the Ruby affair is suspect from the standpoint of his being in the basement of police HQ. Why the conspirators would do something in broad daylight instead of in any number of secure locations in the jail speaks to there not being a tie-in.
     
  17. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who but you claims Ruby was actually a made man, member, of the Mafia? No one that I'm aware of.
    Ruby was a long time informer and strip club owner that catered to both Dallas police and mob people. That does not make him "made"
    but way to pull a theory from your ass. Are you trying to make yourself sound more intelligent?
    Mission not accomplished.

    LOL....like in Oswald's cell, for instance?
    Having Ruby shoot Oswald on national tv (I was watching the Sunday morning news and it happened live) ends all speculation, no one can doubt that Ruby shot him. It shuts Oswald up and ends all talk of a trial.

    I'm not sure why you continually question reality. To try to counter the clear intent of Jack Ruby's statement, I suppose.
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2017

Share This Page