Right, less than a year after saying that firing sessions would be unacceptable. I wonder what changed? Haha, no I don't. And you don't, either.
So was Manafort, he was investigated a decade ago. That did not stop Mueller and his inquisition. And so many suspicious irregularities of the investigation of Hillary have come to light lately that a new investigation of her is completely warranted, together with the investigation of her investigators.
False. At no time was Manafort investigated in earnest. On the contrary, Hillary was thoroughly investigated numerous times over 2 decades, with investigators delivering comprehensive reports. They all ended the same way. So let the little crminal Whitaker start flailing...meanwhile, the house will get his ass thrown out pretty quickly for being the little criminal he is.
It's not as much about Sessions leaving as it is about the goon he replaced him with. And what his next actions are.
Hillary is guilty as hell. Charges should be filed and they weren't. The Attorney General when asked said she refused to answer on grounds it could incriminate her. The head of the IRS testified under oath that phone records were lost/destroyed when they weren't and the IRS did use their power to harass Conservative groups which I am sure is against the law. FBI, we know kept charges off to allow Hillary to run. That should be obstruction of justice.
Nonsense. Manafort was investigated in earnest and it did not stop Mueller's witch hunt from a do over. Hillary on the other hand was never investigated in earnest, so many irregularities, violations of FBI procedures, negligence, omissions, destruction of evidence, actions of corruption and bias have been discovered that the reopening of her case and the case of those corrupt disgraced investigators of hers is absolutely warranted. Does the name Peter Strzok ring a bell? This disgraced and already fired for cause agent was the investigator of Hillary.
Because it was recommended that no charges be filed, as no illegal activity was found. Thank goodness our justice system does not operate by the directives of squealing mobs like you Hillary-obsessed squawkers .
The defense is already going to question his objectivity, he's a senior citizen(literally). And while that is a low blow, welcome to the dirtiness of our court system. I'd also point out that he rejected Papadoulous's advances. If Sessions is Mueller's key 'witness', that really doesn't bode well for the prosecution.
Is this the answer you are talking about? "Every bit of Trump's bizarre behavior makes him look guilty. He behaves exactly as one would expect of a guilty man. Everyone knows this...even his cultists here twisting themselves into pasty white little pretzels to run cover for him." I am just honestly kinda confused about the argument you are trying to make, what would Session tell a judge or jury he witnessed and for what crime are you talking about? Do you just mean that he does "a lot of illegal stuff" and that Sessions was around for it so he must have witnessed it? Just looking for clarification
Which is fine, but that is not what we are talking about. We are talking about the ethics of the impartiality of the attorney general. And he followed the very clear amd corre t recommendations of ethics committees to recuse. You simply are never going to make a good case against this, ever. Stop wasting your time.
Recommended by corrupt, disgraced and fired Strzok, Comey and Co who are in the pockets of the Clinton family. Can't you come up with a legitimate defense, not this childish nonsense?
Well it is a forum and that is what people do around here. Would you mind explaining then? Trying to understand the argument as there have been a ton of Sessions talk tonight, I just can't tell what crimes you are talking about.
No legitimate defense of bogus "recommendation" by corrupt, disgraced and already fired rogue FBI agents? Figures.
There is nothing to explain. "The speech and behaviors of those in the campaign" explains itself fully.
So many Progressives all over the internet are PISSED off tonight. Pretty crazy actually, like straight up VIOLENT pissed off
The same 'ethics committee' filled with FBI agents, who obviously don't have their own 'agenda'(yes, I'm saying it wasn't a proper ethics committee.). There's no justification for the decision, there was NEVER any on the simple account that the President hasn't been charged. For god sakes, the President hasn't even formally been named in any investigative pursuit.
Wow, really? You are delusional if you think that is true. Are you that uneducated on the topic or just that in the dark about how the legal system works?
That's all just op-ed ad hominem....that stuff holds no weight with me. It is for influencing the weak minded. I recognize the sound ethical argument for why he recused, and so does he. You and the unwashed masses can operate on that emotional level.
There is this idea that you can "charge" people based on random rumors and, how did he put it? Actions, speech and behavior patterns? It's absolutely unreal, then they think they get to completely dig through a persons life while putting him on trial. This is not how the justice system works and it is downright scary that they think it does. Is this the NPC Progressive stuff we have been seeing from Universities coming out in the world?
You are like a walking talking NPC meme, the 4Chan guys couldn't write it any better themselves. It's pretty funny actually.
If what is true? I don't think you are following very well. Last time (fourth time i have had to explain this very simple idea, PLEASE pay attention): One of the conflicts that Sessions had to avoid was being called as a potential witness to the behaviors and speech of other members of the Trump campaign, as he worked in the Trump campaign, which was a subject of the investigation. Note that these behaviors do not have to be known or described for that to be true. And it is, indeed, true. So, whine all night....draw moustaches on pictures of Comey all night,and weep for the children...these are just simple, sound arguments that are quite independent of anything you WISH were true.
Wow! Some random anon people on the internet are "pissed"? Sounds like a Major Revolution! Time to declare Martial Law.
Why the hell go after Hillary? She lost for Christ’s sake. If this new AG is a big enough dipshit to go after her or the FBI, he will be seen as another “Deep State” crackpot and nobody will take him seriously. He will be exposed as a probable Trump plant installed to obstruct the Mueller investigation and the congress will tear him a new one. Get a grip champ. The Sean Hannity show is an excercise in pure fantasy. Don’t drink his kookaid.
