Judge Donald Middlebrook's ruling, the long and short of it is that Trump's suit, let alone being disqualified on statute of limitations grounds, amounted to a hyperbolic rant lacking legal merit on a number of levels, too many for me to go into detail, but the judge slammed it with strong language--the frivolity was so egregious he is considering sanctions against the lawyers, for filing a 'shotgun' suit. Dismissed with prejudice (meaning it cannot be refiled). Moreover, what this judge did was shoot down many ot the typical allegations the right, in general, make against the investigations into Trump, that they were a 'hoax', a 'deep state out-to-get Trump conspiracy' etc., with articulated precision far better than I could ever do. So, the next time I hear 'TDS' or 'Fake news" or 'deep state' 'Russia, Russia, Russia' or 'hoax' or any such bullpucky along the usual right wing talking points, I'm just going to point them to this document, below. Judge Throws Out Trump’s RICO Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton: ‘Length, Hyperbole, and the Settling of Scores and Grievances’ Have No Legal Merit https://lawandcrime.com/trump/judge...of-scores-and-grievances-have-no-legal-merit/ A federal judge has dismissed the sprawling archlawsuit filed by Donald Trump against his perceived political enemies during the 2016 election, including Hillary Clinton, opponents, including the Democratic National Committee, James Comey, Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, and Fusion GPS. From the court document (embedded in the article), judge's ruling: More troubling, the claims presented in the Amended Complaint are not warranted under existing law. In fact, they are foreclosed by existing precedent, including decisions of the Supreme Court. To illustrate, I highlight here just two glaring problems with the Amended Complaint. There are many others. But these are emblematic of the audacity of Plaintiff’s legal theories and the manner in which they clearly contravene binding case law.