Justice Dept. IG report released on FBI's `Insubordinate' in Clinton Probe, Inspector General Finds

Nope!

And, the felony leaks are never helpful to Trump, either.

Thick nest of thieves, crooks and liars in the very heart of the FBI and DOJ, left over from the Corrupt Obama Adminisration and Mueller continues to carry the flag in The Trump Witch Hunt

In a letter to congressional leaders, Inspector General Michael Horowitz said his office “succeeded in using forensic tools” to recover messages between senior FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page during a key five-month period ending the day special counsel Robert Mueller III was appointed to investigate possible coordination between the Kremlin and Trump’s campaign. The missing messages have sparked a political firestorm in recent days, as GOP leaders and the president have questioned how the FBI failed to retain them.

Mueller hired both Strzok and Page on his team of Trump-Russia investigators. They were part of the biased group of far left Obama and Clinton supporters hired by Mueller. Strzok was removed from the team after his text messages were selected in an investigation carried out by the IG. When identified, the IG notified Mueller who then removed Strzok from his team. The claim was that Strzok was biased against President Trump and removed didn’t hold water because Mueller’s whole team was that way. We now know that the text messages between lovers Strzok and Page are filled with evidence of more sinister actions involving protecting Hillary Clinton from the crimes she committed and framing President Trump for the crimes he didn’t commit.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...matter-is-flawed-obamas-deep-state-runs-deep/

 

This is EXACTLY why we have grand juries and ESPECIALLY when it is law enforcement officials involved in possible crimes and misdeeds. We already have 5 FBI officers including case officers being referred to the OPC. That's the first step to a criminal referral.

 

Schiff hasn't released his OIG counter memo yet, and in the interim libs are feigning vindication. Horowitz only investigated the FBI's professional conduct, not the case itself. Horowitz concluded it wasn't handled properly, and intentionally or not, revealed Rosenstein obstructed congressional investigations. John Huber will determine whether a grand jury, or special counsel should re-examine the FBI's case against Hillary. There's no silver lining in Horowitz report. Rosenstein is living on borrowed time, just as surely as Strzok & Page. The wheels may turn slowly, but the train can't be stopped. A few preliminary excerpts got McCabe fired. It's going to get worse, and never get better.

 

Lock them up!

 

Horowitz destroyed the RW narrative of some plot by obama lynch and Comey to clear her!

 

They’re not wrong, Strzok’s messages sure do indicate political bias, this certainly isn’t a positive attribute in law enforcement, his views evidently were shared by others. Though the IG didn’t find tangible evidence, what has transpired relating to the two relevant investigations certainly suggests there was a serious problem. Absent a pervasive view in the FBI that Hillary was preferable to Trump, what else explains the dismissal of her truly careless negligence with classified information and the persistent fruitless pursuit of evidence of Trump’s wrongdoing?

Some dismiss these messages as star crossed notes between lovers, but there are many, they’re monothematic, amongst people who played important roles and relating to others similarly situated. This is not what one would desire among FBI decision-makers.

 

No he didn't. Horowitz report doesn't include any DOJ texts / emails sent or received by Lynch. I'm still reading but Lynch's DOJ / State dept. communications are conspicuosly absent. We've read the texts / emails where the agencies coordinated their tarmac meeting cover story. Horowitz in fact included the texts of an interviewing agent who plainly said, regarding an HRC aide: "Awesome! he lied his ass off" ... the staffer finally came clean AFTER being granted immunity ... by whom and why, isn't an issue that's going to go away. The DOJ, Lynch, would have had to at least agree, if not insist the deal be made. I skipped to Horowitz last page ... "happily ever after" ain't anywhere on that page.

 

And of the reporters who were engaged in the bribing?

 

Horowitz says the tarmac meeting was "accidental" and unplanned yet theyvhad the whole area cordoned off from thebpress and the public. Want to know if he interviewed the pilots and got the flight plans and the interviewed trip planners.

 

It's loaded with evidence, his summary is weak sauce and his conclusions read like obvious parody, but the body of the report is solid.

The thing to remember is the backed Hillary at hated Trump because he sides with us.

They've hated us – those heartland Americans clinging to our guns and religion – long before Trump came along and will do so long after he is gone. The Justice Department's I.G. report has confirmed widespread prejudice among top Justice and FBI officials, but it's a mistake to think this bias is directed against Trump per se. Officials like Peter Strzok were intent on "stopping" Trump, but stopping him from doing what? Stopping him from restoring the right of ordinary Americans to govern their country.

There exists among "progressives" a widespread culture of intolerance and hatred directed at the middle class. Robert De Niro, Jimmy Kimmell, Joy Behar, and the rest of them repellant.

With the Trump presidency, everyday citizens have gained a voice in Washington. At exactly the same time, media attacks on these Americans have exploded. The inference is clear: Hollywood, the mainstream media, and academe believe that ordinary Americans must be silenced. Only the "smart" ones, as leftists consider themselves, have a right to be heard. The left is attempting to silence the opposition and has been doing so for a long time.

The problem is that, in the end, silencing the opposition involves the use of force.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/06/why_do_they_hate_us.html

 

Exactly this was just a fact finding mission and he was limited in who he could talk to and had no subponea power. This should lead to an independent criminal investigation.

 

http://www.PoliticalForum.com/index...hell-the-fallout-begins-to-take-shape.535233/

 

And right-wing media doesn't do enough to emphasize this, which is a big problem for us.

The leftists are masters of hate - they embody it, they perpetuate it, they thrive on it, and they capitalize on it.

Come November the Republicans will run on any number of the dozens and dozens of great improvements they've overseen, things that actually make life better in America.

The leftists however will run on hate, ie fabricated outrage over useless social issues that aren't hurting people en masse followed up by "solutions" that will.

This latest bullshit manufactured outrage over illegals being "torn" from their children is a great example.

The entire thing is a ****ing joke, what crime out there comes with an arrest that brings the kids along too?

Do we let drunk driving mom's take their kids with them to jail?

Paul Manafort has two kids and yet he's in prison ...does that count?

These leftist are fabricating hate in order to convince dumb people that separating criminals from children is somehow a new policy that only Trump is responsible for.

 

They do, always run on hate. Running a Clinton on the War on Women, though.... Holy Smokes!

 

They will run another woman but it will be a colored women.

I'm predicting Kamala Harris will be the 2020 nomination.

 

Kamala-toe is a crooked prosecutor and they need the black vote. I'm not sure how popular crooked prosecutors are with America, though, Democrats are clearly the party of crooked prosecutors, so maybe she is a good fit.

 

She checks two special identity boxes that is literally all that matters for the Dems.

They cant run on their record because, as you know, not only do they have nothing positive to boast about they're tainted with unanimous and lengthy history of proudly voting against things that have directly improved the lives of Americans.

So what does that leave?

Social issues.

Non-stop wall to wall manufactured outrage fabricated relevance social issues.

But to sell that they need someone who checks boxes so that the defense to literally everything will be "blah blah racist sexist" and so that, combined with a ramp up in her image grooming, is why I'm betting that the Dems will pick Kamala.

Now of course the magic of the checkbox qualification is that anyone can meet it so if someone comes along that's even more of a radical bigot then Kamala, or checks off more boxes than she does, then the Dems could pick that person instead.

 

Nope!

Strzok Pivoted Quickly Away from Clinton E-Mail Case to "Stop" Trump from Being Elected