Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by pjohns, Jan 11, 2019.
Not surprised a racist like you can’t comprehend reading
That is a violation of forum rules
Calling African Americans “lumps of coal” is a violation of life rules
I didn't do that....and you should not either
You called Justice Thomas one.
Thank you. Now it is clear I never referred to a race in that way.
You refereed to an African American as a lump of coal. Clear racism
I am glad we cleared this up. Further forum violations will be reported
Further life violations will get your called out. Whatever you need to do to justify your racism
She is expected to fully recover. There is no reason to step down.
Justices are not expected to retire just because they have a medical problem. Permanent incapacitation or loss of mental function are the standards.
Your conclusion of "dishonorable" is based in ignorance.
Thank you for your opinion. Have a wonderful day
You responded to a poster who used not asking questions as an -example- within a larger claim, not that it "means she can't do her job." Get honest. Stopped reading there.
Remember folks ALWAYS have a WRITTEN RECORD of ANY discussion attempted with a Leftist.
Yes. You tell the poster. There plenty of geniuses who want to SEE her back on the bench and have offered to donate their hearts, brains, liver, spleen ,,, all kinds of body parts so they can experience her return. We're not talking the sharpest tools in the shed and no one's told them that there won't be alot of SEEing going on after they're dead.
I don't think there are any rules per se. I thought I heard that a recent appointee did not participate in decisions for which they weren't present for oral arguments. Some justices in the past, like Rehnquist, worked from home and may have participated. During another absence Rehnquist abstained. While it may be unfair to the litigants, I feel more sorry for those consumed by hatred all the way to the grave. I don't want to go that way, but then I'm not a Liberal and, therefore, hatred is alien to me.
Prove it. Lol
you prove yours first.
No matter how much you don't like it...still her call
If she is, indeed, returning to the bench, I would certainly applaud that.
However, that is not my understanding.
I hears that she plans to stay home next week, too.
Where did you receive your information?
Note: I am not being argumentative; I simply wish to check your source against mine, and see what is correct.
Separate names with a comma.