Kamala Harris called out for owning a handgun

O? Quote me the statute that bans the use of the word "bomb" on an airplane. Go on. Do it.
Because I can point out the hughes amendment and the NFA. Quote you chapter and verse even.
And yet no one here is waiting with baited breath for you to provide the statutes which make it illegal to say bomb on an airplane.
Because they don't exist and you're as stated comparing apples and wood.

You can indeed say bomb on an airplane particularly if you mean that show was a total bomb. I know, I've done it.

Please do not tell me that you think that scene from meet the parents was real? ITS A COMEDY MOVIE FFS. NEXT YOU'LL TELL ME YOU THINK HAPPY GILMORE REALLY WON THE MASTERS!!!!



What you cannot do on an airplane is cause a panic. If you incite a panic, you can be charged for it. That's not the same as "there is a list of words thou shalt not utter on an airplane on pain of imprisonment."
That's not the same as "simple possession of this tool you have an explicit enumerated right to is 3 felonies."

 

do you support taking a machine gun on a airplane?

and your lucky you were not arrested, your not supposed to say bomb on a airplane

 

Sure if the airline allows such things as carry on. However, since its a private service on private property, I'd submit to the restrictions on arms the property owner bargained for in the contract we have together. I tend to doubt the airline would allow that.

 

no, I mean on your person, do you support that, or do you want some gun restrictions?

 

Asked and answered.
See above: The property owner may restrict numerous and sundry behaviors as part of our contract for services.
They can institute an "arms must be checked" policy. They can institute an "we won't transport arms at all even as baggage make other arrangements or **** off" policy. They can institute a "bring a machinegun and get half your ticket price on your next flight comped" policy.
Its their airliner, their personnel, their business, their private property, their rules.

 

does the government allow that, they control the airports

 

Now you're asking what the law already is instead of what I'd want it to be? Care to make up your mind?

I'm fairly certain the .gov restricts carry, permitted or otherwise allowed by state laws or otherwise, to absolutely none past the metal detectors. Past that point you have to have it locked up etc.
If your follow up question is "Do I find that to be an infringement?" then YES I do because its a top down statute, rather than a choice by the property owner (airline).

 

see, I think most are ok with people not sitting next to them with loaded machine guns at hand, some restriction are ok in my book

 

Democrats as a party, like to chisel away at our gun rights. It;s a fact. Had it not been for the NRA, our rights would be gone by now. We would be like Australia.

 

Unless the same individuals demonstrate the same hesitation when it comes to all firearms, the distinction being drawn on the part of yourself is nonsensical at best. The people of the united states are so inherently stupid, they assume that any firearm is a fully-automatic simply because they do not know any difference.

 

Actually, what difference does it make? Are you going to tell me the majority of shootings done in America are with fully automatic weapons? Actually, I only know of one where a "bumpstock" was added. The idea to attack fully autos is just the 1st attempt to take away ALL gun rights. A 6 shot .38 special is sufficient for me now. I am a good guy I only looking for self defense and hunting. Talk of taking away my 2nd amendment rights, has me thinking of moving up to a more proficient weapon. Doubt if I'd ever be able to own a fully auto, but I definitely will get one to do the job!

 

If that is the private property owner's wish my objections don't matter.

As government fiat? Its a violation of my rights and your objections don't matter.

 

Not as much as you think, at most airports one can go right through an FBO and board a plane with a concealed firearm, I have done it hundreds of times.

 

You obviously do not know the difficulty or the outright cost in acquiring a full auto. Also there is no such thing as an assault weapon. That is a political for the lemmings to latch onto because they don't know s#!t about guns.

 

sure there is, if there is no such thing, then let's ban them... oh you would be singing a different toon then, Trump says go after the guns first, due process second

 

Quite incorrect, the DOJ has admitted that semi-automatic assault weapons do not exist in the case of U.S. versus Distributed Defense.

If the DOJ states they do not exist then they legally do not exist no matter how many false statements the anti-gunners proffer.

 

Open carry must be legal for active posse.

 

That’s the funniest post in days. I guess you’re saying that anyone for gun control so only legal citizens can possess a gun, that person isn’t allowed to be a legal citizen.

 

They have no business owning a gun. Call the creators of red flag laws. The police they hate so much will hurry to their aid.

 

Either Kamala is playing the long game, and hoping to look like a candidate gun owners can relate to, plus not voting for her could be considered both sexist and racist. OR she's just another liberal hypocrite. I'm going with hypocrite...