Discussion in 'Current Events' started by superbadbrutha, Aug 11, 2018.
What America is Ingraham and Carlson speaking of?
Do they want the America of 1940s and 50s?
Prolly the America that did not have idiots protesting and rioting.....
There is no defending this so please don't try.
Were you lefties pissed when David Duke endorsed Keith Elilson?
So Obama was a racist Black Panther since they endorced what he said? Same with violent murderous BLM thugs and La Raza? Betcha some terrorist Palestinians liked OBama too. Does it make OBama a terrorist by association?
What Ingraham said needs no defense. It's true.
At a certain point, Ted Kennedy's Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, absolutely changed who the US was letting into our
nation. And who they were keeping out. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965
You haven't a clue.
It kills me how people can say "diversity is our strength", meaning racial diversity... meaning less white people. That's somehow fine, yet whites who hold the opposing view... THAT is racist. It's nonsense. I wish the supporters of diversity would at least be honest.
"Diversity" is code for less white people, or none at all. The left feels absolutely free to denigrate white people in a manner they wouldn't dream of applying to non whites.
It's hypocritical racism without a doubt.
Why does the LW Complex constantly attempt the same, tired and fallacious guilt by association canards? Do they think anyone other than them falls for the "throw 5 apples into a barrel of 100 oranges and it becomes a barrel of apples" dumbassery? They do this over and over.
Is it because they are so mired in consumer/celebrity culture that they mistakenly conflate celebrity endorsements of products in advertisements, which seek to build an association between the celebrity and the product, with any endorsement of anything by anyone? Are there adults who actually think that way?
What does it mean when anyone anywhere agrees or disagrees with some public figure? Just that and nothing more.
Because this is how they shut people up. Shutting people up is easier than having to reach the logical ends of one's position. If you hold a view which isn't within the realm of their progressive faith, they'll just lob some accusations at you, then you're forced to put out that fire rather than discuss the issue at hand.
LOLOL...did you read the article? The racists who wrote it said black on black crime is a right wing cliche all while the people in Chicago want the mayor to step down because of black on black crime. If we ignore black on black crime we're racists, and we're racists if we mention it.
But that's not the point, is it? Allowing immigrants into this country, and for the left that only means colored immigrants, will change it, how can it not? And so what if someone agrees with Ingraham? Are you aware of all the racists who agreed with and probably voted for Obama and Clinton? Is it their fault racists voted for them?
Well said. The only acceptable position in our society is to wish there was less white people. Wishing for more white people makes you literally Hitler.
It has something to do with who runs our media, entertainment industry, and other fields. They simply don’t like white Europeans or Christians very much.
That's one. Another is that it's only ok to identify as white if the connotation is negative. For example, "as a white male, I'm ashamed of the actions of my ancestors", that's PC approved. "I'm proud of my European heritage",... trigger level 1000.
They want to stop illegal immigration. They also want expanded (but controlled) legal immigration.
Why is the liberal brain unable to understand this?
I can’t personally speak for the 1940s.........but I would take the ‘50s and ‘60s in a headtbeat. I don’t think that Laura Ingram is the only American concerned about the dramatic demographic changes since 1965.
Really post where they have stated this.
Well just say you loved the days of Jim Crow.
They repeat it daily. It's the standard Republican and conservative position. The msm doesn't report it because they don't want the American people exposed to conservative positions. The msm would rather just lie and say, "Trump calls all Hispanics rapists".
why do you guys oppose racial/ethnic diversity?
Because it doesn’t work on a national level and leads to Balkanization and ethnic tensions/violence.........as well as political tribalism.......
Just say you don't understand the difference between demography and the Jim Crow laws of the South.
If you cared about illegal immigrants displacing native black workers you certainly do a good job of keeping that a secret.
If we wanted more diversity we should really be asking what type of diversity.
Go ahead Leftists... share with everyone what Ingraham said that was not true.
These Logical Fallacies that the OP threw out, Guilt by Association, are debate losers and for total idiots that can't comprehend without having some propagandist fill their tiny skulls with talking points.
The challenge is out. What did she say that was wrong?
When diversity runs counter to assimilation then we have an issue.
but that same America did have lynchings & imperialistc overseas wars
Separate names with a comma.