Lawyers may start vetting Trump's tweets

About time, dontcha think?

Trump has caused himself more damage with his top of 13yo mind tweets than anything else he's done. Give it a rest, eh?

NBC Sunday show speculated this was already the case citing this tweet:

They asserted that no other Trump tweet qualified a Trump blast with "It is my opinion..."

I bet they're right. That's a cuck way of phrasing, something the old Trump would never say, something a lawyer certainly would.

But overall it's just more evidence of his unfitness for the office. He can't effing tweet without screwing the pooch. Resign. G T F O.

Just found this bit of delicious irony:

 

But why when it's all fake news? Tweeting about a fake scandal couldn't have legal ramifications.

 

But that would interfere with Trump's sharing of what he calls "the real story" with us. How little he realizes!


Donald J. Trump‏Verifizierter Account @realDonaldTrump 23 Std.vor 23 Stunden
The Fake News Media works hard at disparaging & demeaning my use of social media because they don't want America to hear the real story!

 

And yet the MSM keeps coming out with stories from 'anonymous' sources.

 

Nothing new about that. You know how freaking long Deep Throat was anonymous?

 

Not very.

 

" citing an advisor to the president."

 

The Comey memos, the leaking of intelligence to Russia by Trump, etc were all leaked anonymously, by insiders. It all turned out to be true. LMAO

Don't worry though, Fox is airing a piece on the Clinton Foundation tonight. That'll keep you right-wingers sufficiently distracted.

 

So are there any others or will he be the only anonymous source brought up to act like all anonymous sources are legit?

This isn't the 70's anymore.

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/25/james-comey-memos-fbi-congress-238837 I'm not distracted, I'm fully focused on this sham to our country. The FBI got an extension on delivering the memos(if in fact they actually exist.) But what I expect(and what I hope Chaffetz doesn't fall for) is another extension, and another extension until it's forgotten.

 

It's been going on forever. It's routine. It comes down to whether we trust the journalists to vet their anonymous sources, who are not anonymous to the journalists, but request that they be anonymous in reporting. From Fox:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nications-channel-in-meeting-source-says.html

A December meeting between Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and one of the senior advisers in the Trump administration, and Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak at Trump Tower focused on Syria, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News Monday.

During the meeting the Russians broached the idea of using a secure line between the Trump administration and Russia, not Kushner, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News. That follows a recent report from The Washington Post alleging that Kushner wanted to develop a secure, private line with Russia.

The idea of a permanent back channel was never discussed, according to the source. Instead, only a one-off for a call about Syria was raised in the conversation.

In addition, the source told Fox News the December meeting focused on Russia's contention that the Obama administration's policy on Syria was deeply flawed.
...

Not naming names here, are they? So what, we shouldn't believe this story, either?

 

lol. Too funny. If you need a lawyer for your tweets then perhaps you just shouldn't tweet.
I think his tweets should also come with a trigger warning to keep the snowflakes away.

 

ummm 30 YEARS !!!!

 

You're not understanding what I'm saying.

All these stories are unnamed sources.

You trot out an unnamed source from the 70's as the reason these unnamed sources are legit.

Is there some other unnamed source that you could trot out instead of a relic from the 70's?

I have a ton of articles from unnamed sources that were bogus. Like Hillary being indicted for instance.

Need more proof than unnamed source after unnamed source after unnamed source. Is getting ridiculous that no one wants to go on record with a dang thing. I don't like it. It looks so dang fishy.

 

Just let the speech writer do the tweeting. Although you don't say you're doing it. You just do it. And whenever I hear Unnamed source, all I hear is LIE.

 

The guy is a snowflake. The biggest of them all.

 

Linda Loveflakes was less exposed than Dims when it comes to the amount of Trump Disorder Syndrome. The left is going to have more than a sore throat when all is said and done. May I offer them a lozenge?

 

Kind of true. But he's the toughest snowflake of them all too. No matter how much sh*t the left shovels over the top of him, he keeps winning. It's totally amazing.

 

The butthurt the left feels about THEIR president is refreshing. It's like the best salve this country has experienced in over half a century.

 

No one can speak against Agent Orange without someone like you accusing them of being "the left" and "butthurt". Sad!

 

Losing.

 

If, indeed, this is going to be the plan from now on--it is a great idea.

Trump is a complete IMBECILE (who shouldn't even be posting on Twitter).

Every pathetic Trump keystroke (that Trump's brain diarrhea contaminates social media with) lowers the collective intelligence of the World.

 

Psychiatrists would be more appropriate as reviewers of Trump's tweets.

 

Funny. Cause I thought it looked like this.