Lesbian teacher: How I convince kids to accept gay marriage, starting at 4-years-oldl

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/l...-kids-to-accept-gay-marriage-starting-at-4-ye

Hyperlink has full story

snip

A primary grade lesbian teacher from an Ontario public school revealed in a workshop at a homosexual activist conference for teachers earlier this month how she uses her classroom to convince children as young as four to accept homosexual relationships.


and in keeping in that light, another homosexual teacher proudly added how she does it

Lesbian: I use math class to teach young kids about homosexuality so I can ‘hide’ it from parents

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/l...ach-young-kids-about-homosexuality-so-i-can-h

HYPERLINK to that story has all

snip

A lesbian teacher ‘married’ to another woman revealed at a pro-gay teachers’ conference earlier this month how she teaches grade 4-5 students to accept homosexuality through what she called “social justice” math.............................

When asked by one of the workshop attendees if she first asks parents’ permission before bringing homosexual issues up in class, Gunn responded that she does not,


Interesting. Here we have 2 teachers who openly admit that they push forth their agenda upon little children and feel they hav the right to do that. I completely disagree with that position because a teacher does not ahve thhe job to push their agenda upon children. That is called indoctrination.

What is most troubling is these 2 teachers freely admit this. How many are doing it without the knowledge of the parents?

>>>MOD EDIT Flamebait Removed<<<

 

Soon they will be teaching that black people exist in public schools! The horror!!!
And the comparison with a consensual adult relationship to animal rape - integrity, you have none.

 

So, putting your ridiculous linking of race and homosexuality aside, are you not concerned about schools being used to push a particular agenda onto small children who can't understand the issue?

 

Only if it was a conservative agenda instead of a liberal one. Pushing one's agenda on small children is perfectly okay as long as it is your agenda and not the other fellows. If it is the other fellows, it is completely wrong and the same people supporting this one would be up in arms against that one.

 

Do we teach 4 year olds about heterosexual marriage at that age?

 

If indoctrination were unacceptable, then we wouldn't allow religious people to take their kids to church. Or is indoctrination is okay so long as it's the parents. Father knows best? Psh. Or is it the teacher who is more of an expert in teaching dozens of kids at a time, usually at the same age, for years?

I would much sooner ban taking kids to church than ban teaching them to accept people who are different from them as just a different kind of family.

As to bestiality, it is categorically different because a non-human cannot indicate consent, and presumably would not want to be raped. Animals only sort of have rights in our society, not the right to live but generally the right to not be tortured. Raping an animal does not resemble forming a homosexual family. No feeling being's rights are being violated when people form a family.

 

More Marxist Demoralization in action. They tried this crap sex ed stuff in the early 1900's in another country and the people rejected it outright. So, they've honed their subversion techniques to what we see today.

 

what agenda? that we can all get along, oh the horror

....

 

This may be a twisted perspective but....

The way I see it, the majority of people are not born gay or lesbian. I think it's like 3% (or less) or something like that if you do a Google search.
I also feel the gay community is enjoying a brief moment in history where there is much tolerance, mainly in America, for their lifestyle.
Right or wrong, I do believe it will soon swing back the other way....to intolerance.

However, right now while there is tolerance, that 3% is kicking ASS in getting their point of view out there and changing what's acceptable while the 97% basically does nothing...other than a few complaints on forums. If the majority is so hell bent on preventing the normalization of gay lifestyles as mainstream, they are doing a lazy ass poor job of pressing their perspective, unlike the gays and lesbians. Is it simply that much important to them? Probably.

So if the 97% basically takes a passive stance while the 3% takes a highly aggressive position and forces changes to suit their perspective, well then congratulations to the mighty 3% as they will win in terms of forcing their perspective to become mainstream....for now.
Minorities (when tolerated) will usually fight harder for acceptance of their perspectives than the majority will against it.

And until God himself steps down from the heavens and intervenes (assuming there is such a thing), that is how it will be apparently.

.....Unless.... America loses freedom for a dictatorship, becomes Islamic or something like that(which appears to be the general direction), in which case God help anyone who made their gayness public info. Gay people (as well as other types of minorities) historically haven't faired well outside of VERY liberal societies, and those are fleeting. Examples? I present Russia, China and the majority of Islamic states to name a few significant ones. In Russia and many Islamic states it's downright dangerous to come out. China "discourages" gayness while in Russia the Gay movement has been silenced by Putin.

So as far as these teachers are concerned....they are simply pressing what is important to them, any way they can, by any means necessary. And that is human nature regardless of the area of concern. Is it right or wrong? That depends on who you ask.

 

try as I may, I will never be a white man. I can stick jimmy anywhere I see fit. Funny how you fail to understand the difference

 

Both of those premises are true. They're also completely irrelevant. We aren't talking about who you have sex with. We're talking about what type of human you find physically and romantically attractive.

You can stick your penis in anything. Doesn't mean you're attracted to it. Plenty of penises are inside of pants right now, yet they don't belong to pantsexuals.

To reiterate: you don't even know what everyone else is talking about

 

A teacher like this should be banned in any school.

 

Cultural Marxism at its finest.

 

Uh huh; and replaced with one with a 'Christian' agenda.

 

I am not linking race to orentation, the struggles of both are just eerily similar.

I generally think the public school system is broken but no, I have no issue with schools teaching that gay people exist. We do not live in the Middle East, tolerance is necessary in the U.S. More of it is needed on both sides of the political spectrum.

 

Homosexuality is a same sex attraction - it has nothing to do with sex - pathetic that you fail to understand the difference.

 

This article explains it well.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2010/03/welcome_to_the_machine_cultura.html

'To observe that Gramsci's formulation ignores the lessons of the human experience is to observe that Marxism itself sows disaster every time it's blindly attempted. So counter to reality is cultural Marxism that believers can further the doctrine only by not discussing reality at all. Lazy thinkers posing as intellectuals have integrated cultural Marxism into the education system for nearly a century, intensifying the societal decay which lazy thinker John Dewey's educational philosophy instigated. Marx and Dewey relentlessly reach from the grave to erode the judgment skills of America's youth and erase consciousness of America's beginnings.'

 

Oppressed groups are getting equality. "b-but cultural marxism!" right-wingers cry. Cry harder, your tears are delicious.

 

Is teaching about wondrous homosexuality a part of skrul curriculum, or is this lesbian teacher an activist? If it is a skrul curriculum, skrul curriculum is to debate. If not, this lesbian teacher belongs on the streets. Agreed?

 

how I get kids to accept blacks, whites, foreigners, gays, the list goes on....

.

 

A parent who wants to "indoctrinate" their children into the parents religion is fine, that's even explicitly protected in the First Amendment. The government through the taxpayer funded school system is theoretically not permitted to indoctrinate the students.

 

Mathematics is just so darn subversive. Just about as subversive as hard science and should be taught only in a church-approved curriculum.

 

How childish. But that's to be expected from your kind.

 

Yes you did link them. and she is not teaching that they exist and that also isn't the responsibility of a third grade teacher.

You are all in with the dumb idea that the purpose of the school system is to indoctrinate children. That means you have nothing to complain about when a school chooses to indoctrinate kids in a value system you disapprove of.

 

If I may offer my two cents.

The source of the "stories" cited in the OP are a Christian, anti gay website with a long history of both inaccuracy and hatred being espoused in the form of editorializing news to promote Christianity and degrade anything not straight and Christian.

Inasmuch, I assume that the article is hopelessly slanted in a bigoted, anti gay fashion consistent with a long history of such actions by the website.

I assume that they are taking a couple of quotes out of context to push their Christian, anti gay views in the article.