Lesbian teacher: How I convince kids to accept gay marriage, starting at 4-years-oldl

So in your mind correcting you and showing you are wrong is somehow saying being gay is bad? Again, another trip in con lala land, thank you for that tour of your idiotic ideology

 

My point is that you appear fundamentally confused on many subjects. I'm not the only one to have noticed.

 

And like I said before, if someone that wants to marry their "closely related" relative is FREE to take it up with the courts. It's not skin off my back if they are allowed to or not. Good luck to them. It's only (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) cons that are getting their panties in a bunch over this.

 

so, you don't really want equality for all, just your pet group. So who in your familiy is gay that made you have to accept it. I guess all the pro-incest crowd needs to have happen is to have a relative of yours like another relative, and you'll be on their team too.

 

How does "Take it up with the courts it's no skin off my back if they get it", equate to "you don't really want equality"?

There is no one that "made" me accept it. I have seen gays raise children, I have seen gays in their marriage and there is nothing wrong with that.
It's called REALITY.

If those that want a incest relationship can show in the courts (as gay marriage proponents have), that their relationship is equal to gay marriage or heterosexual marriage and deserve the same thing, I'm more than happy to see them do that.

We know YOU aren't for equality and look down on gay couples so don't project onto me the lack of equality you have.

 

I respond in kind to posters that are hateful - posters that are respectful receive the same respect. And I have seen no concrete proof that people are born gay so I do not claim it - I know it was not a choice on my part though, where are getting your view that I claimed otherwise?

 

I can't prove it, so I don't claim it.... but yet, for me, I was born gay.


lol


I see the gay agenda just got to you during your formative years.

 

Laws don't regulate who you must like or can hate, they do limit how the government and even individuals may treat people. Actions are regulated by law. You are free hate black people all you like, you can't use government resources to collectively harm folks who happen to be black.

The teacher you hypothesized would not be able to use school resources or authority to harm the folks he didn't like. The real teacher in this case seems to be using school resources and authority to remind folks that they can and should expect equal treatment.



​

​

 

[/QUOTE]

I assumed you thought that communism and socialism are interchangeable. I didn't give you enough credit.

But yes, they are compatible. They weren't used that way intentionally though.

 

Either your reading comprehension is lacking or your bias is showing. I said I did not choose to be gay, I never said I was born gay - it could be environmental, trama during early childhood, genetic, ect. Human sexuality is varied across a huge spectrum and even people that have dedicated their life to understanding it only have a string of theories - and I was raised in a very macho family with plenty of both male and female role models, stable two parent home, and thought gays were bad for the vast majority of my life.
Feel free to shovel your bs though.

 

How do you know that? I don't even have any memories going any further back than 3 or 4 yrs old. Certainly didn't even know what a sexual attraction even means. I think maybe I was born attracted to my left hand, and my heterosexuality didn't develop until puberty. Girls in 6th grade still had cooties.

 

Ive been acquainted with two current homosexuals in their early 20s who Ive known since they were little kids. Before puberty you never would have even guessed that they might be gay. Wasnt until about 16 that I or even their parents even entertained the possibility.
My theory is that some kids just don't develop a normal heterosexual attraction to the opposite sex during puberty. This simply allows for a homosexual attraction to develop, but does not cause it to occur. Without the driving urge to copulate with the opposite sex, an urge to be close and intimate with another person and the urge to experience orgasm continues. At that point it could go either way. History, culture, tradition, social norms, peer pressure, law and religion direct 90% of them the heterosexual way while circumstances and environment steer 10% the other way.

Even the so called scientific evidence that is claimed to show that homosexuals are born gay, actually supports my theory better. Every single genetic characteristic or brain difference they point to is not present in ALL gays and is not absent from all heterosexuals. They merely point to characteristics that are more likely to be present in homosexuals and less likely to be present in heterosexuals. This isn't causation and is instead merely an influence. This is exactly what you would expect to see using my theory. These characteristics don't cause the homosexuality, they simply make it more likely to occur. Failing to develop during puberty the usual, overwhelming biological urge to copulate with the opposite sex, simply makes homosexuality more likely.

The gay brain studies for instance.
"Symmetry of Homosexual Brain Resembles That Of Opposite Sex, Swedish Study Finds".
"Gay Brain Structure Similar to Straight Opposite Sex"
"Homosexual brain resembles that of opposite sex"
"Scientists Link Brain Symmetry, Sexual Orientation",
"Gay brains structured like those of the opposite sex"

What did the study actually show?

So 50% of the homosexual male brains resembled 52% of the heterosexual female brains, the other 50% DID NOT resemble those brains.
And 55% of the homosexual female brains resembled 56% of the heterosexual male brains. The other 45 % DID NOT resemble those brains. Thats the entire basis of this much heralded "gay brain". Would seem such biological factors at most have only the slightest influence and not a cause.

 

That's certainly a possible scenario and an interesting theory.
In this instance the individual still did not choose to be gay.

 

"If our minds are ruled by destructive emotions, by self-centredness, with little regard for others, we won’t be happy. As social animals we need to work together. With friends around us, we feel secure, happy and our minds are calm. We’re physically well too. When we’re filled with anger, fear and frustration, our minds are upset and our health declines. Therefore, the ultimate source of happiness is warmheartedness."

 

Actually Marxist communism contradicts Nationalism while socialism does not. That's one of the many differences. Stupid assumption

 

I didn't choose to prefer chocolate ice cream over vanilla either, but I make that choice every time I choose chocolate. And I certainly don't believe that my preference for chocolate is some kind of inherent trait and I certainly don't define my identity as one who prefers chocolate ice cream.
And yes they do choose. I suspect the majority of those who identify as homosexual are in fact bisexuals who have made the choice that they prefer the same sex. Just as I suspect there are probably more bisexuals who chose to identify as heterosexual, than there are people who identify as homosexual or bisexual combined.
I personally know a man who identified as heterosexual, married, raised two boys for 20 years, divorced, overweight and balding in his late 40s dated women for 2 years without ever getting to the having sex part, the womens choice not his. And one drunken night with a smooth skinned blonde haired boy half his age and a year later he identifies as a homosexual. Says he now gets laid all the time, with a variety of partners, younger than the women he would be able to entice to date him.
One time we were on the beach and I commented about one of our mutual friends, new girlfriend that was smoking hot in a little tiny bikini, half both of our ages. He agreed she was hot and I asked him if she was madly in love with him, in a relationship with him, in uncontrollable lust of his loins, did he think he could again identify as heterosexual. He said "hell yeah"! He admits hes bisexual but finds it easier when dating men to identify as a homosexual. Just as 20 years with his wife and kids he found it easier to identify as a heterosexual.

The arguments for gay marriage require the separation of sexuality from procreation. Welcome to the new sexuality, forcibly cleaved from procreation. Its what the gays and their advocates wanted. I think that's why so many people who now identify as homosexual, used to identify as heterosexual. In their 20s and 30s their sexuality is connected to procreation. In their 40s and 50s, with only sexual gratification as the purpose, whether it is a man or woman, sexual gratification can be achieved. Starting a family is more important in your 20s and 30s, by your 40s and 50s sexual gratification is the only remaining purpose.

 

Our brilliant ultra-liberal Calif. legislators decided to mandate a LGBT curriculum in our schools (K-12...now temporarily 8 - 12 IIRC) to teach the 'contribution' of LGBT people in our history. Yup...as if politicians should get involved in deciding school courses. They should stay out of it.

Aside from the 'gay' issue...our teachers are already overwhelmed with oversized classes and our students are far behind our 'global' competitors in math and science. Our HS graduation rates are abysmal vs. the 'best' schools in the U.S. and shameful vs. other nations.

Yet our 'politically correct' ultra lib Dems thought it was necessary to throw in LGBT classes for young American's at the expense of critical math, science courses? Liberal ideology...agenda on full display at the expense of a good education.

Cross dressing education won't prepare our kids well...

 

And they prohibited any material that reflects badly upon homosexuals. Homosexuals have higher rates of mental illness, suicide, drug and alcohol addiction, sexual partners, stds and early death. But you cant teach kids such things. But they will probably spend a day and a half on the glory that is Harvey Milk.

 

See, I'm more or less permanently stuck in 'assume absolutely nobody understands half of the words i'm saying' mode because a sizeable amount of people on this forum are completely ignorant of terminology. You seem to have a handle on it though.

 

I'll watch wedding by eating popcorn.

 

Isnt it ironic that it is instead you who doesnt understand the words you are saying.

 

I feel sorry for cons like you who are going to have a meltdown when SSM is legalized across the land. I hope you don't kill yourself or something stupid like that.

 

no, it will just be viewed at like adulterors.... also viewed as a sin. There are always loopholes in laws. so I'm not allowed to not serve you because you are gay.... ok, well, I can refuse to serve because you're causing a "disruption"


It's all about wording. all legalizing will do, is just make me find another way to do the same thing I've always done.... object to your lifestyle choice.

 

And thank you again for pointing out, that you wish to do EVERYTHING in your power to purposely discriminate against gays. You cons just keep showing your true colors through and through. Cons keep proving what true pieces of (*)(*)(*)(*) they really are with each passing day.

 

it's not discrimination.... it's not supporting gay events... I'll serve a gya