Lesbian teacher: How I convince kids to accept gay marriage, starting at 4-years-oldl

So do you support EVERY customers events you sell a product to? That's a ridiculous claim from you.

This is where cons just get stupid. You are now trying to say that if you sell something to a gay you are supporting their event. Sorry that isn't how things work. When I buy gasoline at the pump, the attendant is no more supporting an event, than the person that sold me window washer fluid that I put in the car to go to the event.

What cons have demonstrated is their willingness to purposely discriminate against gays. Cons keep proving what pieces of (*)(*)(*)(*) they are each and every day. They prove they should not be in any position of authority.

I hope you and your ilk KEEP saying how much they will work around loopholes to discriminate against gays. I hope all those you support running for elections say that as well.

 

I do.... I don't have to support their activities though.... if a satanic person came in and wanted me to bake a cake of Satan (*)(*)(*)(*)ing on Jesus' face.... I wouldn't and I shouldn't have to as a Christian....

It has nothing to do with your faith, your sexuality, your gender if I don't want to serve you....

 

Id say your discrimination against "cons" far exceeds his discrimination against gays. And in 33 states its perfectly legal to discriminate against gays, just as its perfectly legal to discriminate against "cons" in 49 states

 

Would it really matter whether the person was "satanic" or not? And Im an atheist and believe I should have the same right to deny the service.

 

Apples and oranges again. By asking to do a Satan cake you are doing something COMPLETELY different. A wedding cake is a wedding cake. Putting Congratulations Steve and Carol is no different than putting Congratulations Steve and Steve.

Show me how the cakes are COMPLETELY different.

Sure it does, you've even admitted as such by specifically calling out GAYS.

 

Would it really matter if it was instead two heterosexual guys seeking wedding services.

 

Please point out where I am SPECIFICALLY discriminating against Cons. Unlike you and your ilk, I'm not saying Cons can't get married where you are with gays. I'm not saying I won't serve a conservative couple in a business as you are with gays.

I think you don't even know what the word discrimination means.

 

What silliness. For instance the gay couple in the sweet cakes case got the same wedding cake from a different baker at a lower price, and got married.

 

So what if i will become teacher for her kids and will tell them that traditional marriage is cool for whole their live?
What she will say? Right! She will say that this is discrimination! Stupid double standards...

 

I agree.... I'm just using Satanic as it could fall under the protection for religion. now if he came into my store, and I say "I ain't serving no Satanist in here...." in a general sense. that's different than serving him up a cake for a ceremony I don't agree with.


This is the problem with trying to force others to accept your beliefs. A satanist and a Christian both have rights.... so whose right trumps whose whenever they conflict?


Same applies here with gays. I have never had an issue serving gays in my entire life. But none of them have ever demanded I support their lifestyle by serving their ceremony.

I'll just call in sick that day.



You will never get Christians to serve gay weddings.... you'll get some Chrisitans who will say they won't and why, and they'll be targetted for eradication, whether it's govt enforced or by mob mentallity.... or you'll simply have Christians refuse to cater the wedding with a "sorry, I'm booked that day" or "I'm sick" or a "ohhhh, I'm sorry, I may be planning my vacation during that time".....

There is always a way.

 

When in Rome...

 

Be my guest:
​

 

Ding, ding, ding we have a winner!

 

Explaining that same-sex couples exist and get married is not pushing an agenda, is is teaching reality.

 

the gay rights movement, is important, no matter what side of the debate you fall on.... You can't teach political US history in the US without discussing it. But no more than I was taught about the cold war during kindergarden story time, politics is just simply not age appropriate is the argument here.


And do you know how many times I was taught about something like civil rights when I was in math? NONE.... because it doesn't belong in math.


a gay teacher sneaking gay rights into a math lesson and lying to parents about it is the definition of #agenda.

 

Because it is a contagious disease, just like socialism.

 

I wasnt comparing gays marrying to someone marrying their horse. I was comparing Nero marrying his de balled slave, dressed up to look look his ex wife. IT had no effect in the law what so ever. Just like the guy that married his horse has no effect in the law.

 

I suspect about 10-20% of those who identify as heterosexual are in fact attracted to both sexes and merely choose to identify as heterosexual. And probably about 50% of those who identify as homosexual are actually attracted to both sexes and choose to identify as homosexual.

Probably more people attracted to both sexes that identify as hetero or homosexual, than there are people who identify as bisexual. Yeah, teach kids from age 5 that homosexual couplings are no different than heterosexual couplings. One is of no more or less value than the other. Perfectly equal alternatives. Yeah, I think they are going to convert droves of bisexual kids into homosexuals. Droves of kids who have difficulty forming heterosexual relationships into homosexuals.

 

why should we? I can teach not to bully, no matter what the reason..... but that doesn't mean I should have to teach them that it's ok....

 

why does a 4 year old

need to be educated

on sexual preference. ​

 

Well...​

... hm.

​

 

They only comparison made in those other references going back 3 years was that they both had no effect in the law.

 

You seem to go to a lot of weddings ... of horses.




​

 

I avoided this thread like the plague, but here's my opinion whether anyone likes it or not. I believe that when something is not acceptable in society it will rarely enter a person's mind. As an example, there was a time when children would quit school at fourteen or sixteen, or marry at a young age but today it would rarely if ever enter a person's mind. The same I'm sure holds true for homosexuality. This doesn't mean that there isn't a segment of the population with legitimate problems...either through birth or nurturing. I did meet a little boy once who had to tell me he was a boy and not a girl. I mean if people are treating you like a girl all your life, then how can you not be a homosexual?

There is something else that I hadn't thought of, at least not in this context. The Russian woman who introduced the law in Russia against proslytizing to children said that maybe it's being promoted in the US as a means of population control. I'm not too sure about that, but I always wondered if the government was behind the feminist movement since more people were needed on the work force in order to compete with Germany and Japan.

Always blame the government...that's my motto.

 

Just one. Just one gay marriage as well. Not that Im comparing the two other than to point out neither one had any effect in the law.