Liberals are tolerant of deviant and irresponsible sexuality, yet they vilify white male sexuality. For example, a white male merely looking is classified as sexual harassment by liberals now.
Well that was rather vague. Please define the context in which you are using "deviant", "irresponsible", and "looking".
For example, in the Bill O'Reilly sexual harassment suit one of his accusers cited the way he looked at her as sexual harassment. Meanwhile, Liberals are tolerant of things like men in a gay pride parade dressing up as Catholic priests.
Conservatives are tolerant of cheating white males, yet they vilify interracial sexuality. For example, a black male merely looking at a white female is classified as sexual harassment by conservatives now.
Well, I have a freind, and if a female he likes passes by, he says hey baby etc....etc ... That is wrong, and I have told him so. Now in the supermarket a lady will smile at me, talk a bit, and I respectfully greet her, the right way, this is ok.
Several things I could have written about in my last book peculiar to liberals but didn’t. Such as: Liberals vilify white male heterosexuality but are very tolerant of deviant forms of sexuality to the point of celebrating it. For example, in the Bill O’Reilly sexual harassment suit one of his accusers cited the way he looked at her as sexual harassment. Meanwhile, Liberals are tolerant of things like gay men in a gay pride parade dressing up as Catholic priests. Is the connotation of gay men dressing up as catholic priests in a gay pride parade lost on anyone??? and Political Correctness as anti-intellectualism in the form of de facto liberal censorship. I have a study that could save the lives of many women and prevent the suffering of many more, but it’s so politically incorrect I get banned from sites when I post it, even though the information in that study could save the lives and prevent the suffering of many women??? I’ll get around to posting that study on my site. I can’t get banned from my own site, hehe… And I cited one study in Molecular Biology going back 10,000 years, examining mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosomal DNA that found many more women have reproduced than men. However, there are multiple studies going back even further than 10,000 years all the way back to the 200,000 years of known human history examining mitochondrial and Y chromosomal DNA that have found many more women have reproduced than men. For example, there is one study that found throughout 200,000 years of known human history that 80% of females reproduced while only 30% of males reproduced. And to this day 4-5 women reproduce for every one man, yet liberals insist that women do not chose alpha males as mates regardless of all this evidence??? I have yet to hear a satisfactory response from a liberal for why rock stars have groupies, yet garbage men don’t if women don’t chose alpha males as mates. In fact, the only explanation at all, from anyone, I have heard, is those women are dumb-lol I have balls of steel, but the balls in my brain must be made of platinum because I have no problem telling the truth regardless of how unpopular that truth may be.
I am not a non intellectual, yet I dare say that I have absolutely no idea what you are on about old man. Carry on then...... Sounds like a fetish thing, dressing up as a CatLick Priest and role playing etc... With Dominatrix submissive stuff thrown in for moar deviant-cy.... lol
Yeah that’s all that he did. Then why was he fired? You learn more about a person by the side of the argument he chooses. You defend an adulterer and sexual harasser and obviously you defend priests who molest little boys
Who will ever defend an Adult Man that molests boys ? There is only an assumption, that is what dressing up as a CatLick Priest means, and if they were advocates of molesting, sure, but was that really the case ?
As far as Boys being molested, it took how many centuries for it to be acknowledged ? How long were the Greeks abusing wee boys ? And before that ?
give specific examples if you want to be believed as for "deviant and irresponsible sexuality" - are you referencing the right wing Log Cabinites ?
