Logical Examination of Atheist/Atheism, (atheology) A Logical Hipocrisy?

why dont you admit you have nothing and be done with it instead of spinning a BS facade. If you really had a point to be made you would have made it. You didnt, because you didnt, you own it.

 

I had a point, it flew far over your head. Not all that quick on the uptake when it comes to your own performance are you?

 

Dude, you cannot address one thing at a time, instead filling the page with mindless, unrelated crap, that nobody wants to read anyway. Then somehow in your mind you think you won.

Talking to you is like playing chess with a pigeon.

 

bullshit, you quoted a line that you unwittingly took out of context, and expect me to guess what is in your head. Bullshit, aint gonna happen, too difficult for you to explain, not my problem, I am certainly not going to waste my time interrogating you to help you figure out what to say.

 

you dont bake a cake one ingredient at a time either, sorry this is too complex.

Another one has exactly ZERO to offer this discussion.

 

I believe I offered you Websters definition. amongst other things.
We are not baking a cake.

 

whats the matter too many socks, cant keep track of them all? even something as simple as a cake analogy and you are stuck in the mud.

 

See, you're stuck on the first point.

 

again its simply not my problem. Make up your mind first you whine that I cover too many angles at once now you whine that I am stuck on the first point, you cant go to point 2 until you get past point 1. Let me know.

 

There is no point two, until you disprove point one.

 

You need to stop plugging your ears and closing your eyes instead of w hining.

 

Seems it is you who is whining.
I won't put up with the BS.
I want answers.
As we said in sales,
Never proceed past a negative answer.

You lose, Atheism is not a religion.

 

Your posts have nothing to do with atheism being a religion and everything to do with denial!




Even Wiki calls it a religion ffs!

Atheism is a religion

The British atheist Sanderson Jones is a founder of the Sunday Assembly atheist church movement.[1]

Atheism is a religion and this has implications in terms of the disciplines of religion, philosophy, Christian apologetics and law.[2] In addition, although many atheists deny that atheism is a worldview, atheists commonly share a number of beliefs such as naturalism, belief in evolution and abiogenesis.[3]

Some atheists have become rather dogmatic. Terribly certain in their conviction that there is no God and anyone who thinks there is is a deluded and dangerous fool. ,,,atheists are becoming as intransigent about their own views as the people they so despise.

Atheism is becoming a religion of its own. It already has its gurus and its revered sacred texts... It has its magnificent temples within which lie mysteries and unknowable truths.[5]

It is not necessary in Smartt's model for every one of these to be present in order for something to be a religion.[10]. However, it can be argued that all seven are present in the case of atheism:

Narrative - this dimension is concerned with stories which explain the origin of the universe and the human life. For Christians, there is the Book of Genesis. For atheists, the Big Bang theory, the abiogenesis hypothesis, the evolutionary paradigm, etc., play a similar role[11] See: Evolution as a secular origins myth

Experiential - this dimension is concerned with personal or spiritual experiences. Many religious believers report experiences of being near to God. Many atheists report an experience of "liberation" in the moment when they first rejected God[12]

Social - the social dimension of religion is concerned with religious leadership and community in congregations. Contemporary atheism has its own leadership (authors such as Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris) and social gatherings (e.g. the Global Atheist Convention held in Melbourne, Australia)[13]

Ethical - this dimension is concerned with the ethical teachings of a religion. Logically speaking, if there is no God, how can there be any objective ethics? Ethics is reduced to each person's individual whims. Despite this, the leaders of atheism are insistent that they do have ethics, and even claim to have better ethics than religious people[14]

Doctrinal - this dimension is concerned with the philosophical teachings of a religion, its claims about the ultimate nature of reality. Some of the central dogmas of atheism include the non-existence of God, the non-existence of afterlife or an immortal soul, that all which exists is ultimately reducible to matter (materialism), and that faith is illegitimate[15]

Ritual[16] - this dimension is concerned with rituals, the celebration of rites, ceremonies or festivals. Although atheism at present has few rituals, there are explicitly atheist versions of rituals to celebrate major life events (birth, marriage, death), and some atheists have proposed annual festivals to substitute for Christmas or Easter, such as Charles Darwin's birthday (Darwin Day). See also: Atheism, rites and rituals

Material[17] - this dimension is concerned with the physical artifacts of a religion, such as buildings, monuments, art, etc., and with physical places considered sacred. Many atheists argue that all nature is sacred.
https://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_is_a_religion

 

Poor baby, cannot face reality.
Can't even address a question, have to flood the page with BS, to cloud the issue. Hide it within the mindless chatter.

Dude, that's psyche 101.
You FAIL

 

what question? You cant even keep all your socks straight dont expect me to.

 

I see no logic being employed in this examination.

 

You can't even keep track, trying to hide stuff in a mountain of BS.

Now I have to go back 10 posts to retrieve something.


I believe I offered you Websters definition. amongst other things.
We are not baking a cake.

It's not a question, it's a statement , a definition of the word "Religion"

 

pull your hands away from your eyes

atheists are making a pretty poor showing! one failure after another and no rebuttals just ad homs

if you did it was one of your socks

 

personally I have been thinking about sending this link to dawkins and his buddies at american atheist central since no one here is capable of discussing the matter, not that I'd expect much better but it would sure be more fun than the typical atheist name calling we see in these threads when their backs are against the wall.

 

Actually..... Atheism is also the belief that we humans are probably the most technologically advanced species in the Universe / Multiverse...... and surely no species greater than us humans could exist that might have developed the ability to take the consciousness of humans...... into higher invisible dimensions of space - time after we die?

The rather impressive evidence that we humans are living in something like a hologram........ is almost immediately rejected by people who claim to be Atheists..... because they are probably too uncomfortable with the various forms of evidence that indicate that intelligences........ with vastly greater technology than we have....... have existed from before human history..... and probably before 13.72 billion years or so ago when our Big Bang event occurred.

Please especially notice link #4, The holographic universe and the NDE
https://www.near-death.com/science/research/science.html

 

LOLOL

Actually we are still waiting for you to disprove Webster's definition so we can move on.

 

Theists have the burden of proof as they are making the claim. There is no proof. Checkmate.

 

since you refuse to post it you will be waiting a long time.

sure until atheists come along and claim there is no God so they lack belief in which case the burden of proof falls 100% upon them. (and please dont whine to me that you cant prove a negative, totally not my problem, should have thought of that before you claimed no Gods exist.)

 

He has a difficult time with reality.
He tries to invent his own.

I wonder what color the sky is in his world.

 

I've already posted it, and I am not going to play your game.
This is why you can't keep track of things.

Avoid the pending point, and Bury it in Bullsh-t.