Should military physical strength and speed standards continue to be lower than optimal to allow inferior white men in special forces and advanced combat roles? It is largely accepted that inferior strength and speed of women endangers lives and cripples the military in terms of combat roles and special forces. Standards being reduced to allow women to qualify is ruining the military per the argument. If so, low physical standards to make it easier for white men to qualify also should not be allowed since the same reasoning means this endangers lives and weakens the military. Study after study shows that black men are stronger on average than white men. It is a genetic fact, just as it is a genetic fact men are stronger than women on average due to dna. While there are rare exceptions, a person only has to look at professional contact sports such as football and to the Olympics to easily see what studies also show: black men generally are measurably stronger and faster than white men, for which white men are inferior to black men for all combat roles, particularly special forces type troops. One only has to look at the percentage of black linemen and linebackers in the NFL compared to whites and who wins in track in the Olympics to recognize that black men generally as decisively stronger and faster than white men. In actual fighting competitions, such as boxing, it also is clear that blacks and non-whites are superior fighters, more rugged, stronger and fastest. For example, in testing police it is known that white police officers, male or female, whether new recruits or 10 year veterans, blacks are notably over 10% stronger than whites. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1604&context=ijes How can reducing the ability of our special forces and top combat units to 87% of what it could be to suit inherently physically inferior white men for PC racial equality be justifiable when it costs lives? What possible justification is there to endanger everyone for the PCism of pretending the races are equal in speed in strength? Granted, to have enough troops it may unfortunately be necessary to have weak, inferior white men in ordinary combat roles, but allowing white men in the extreme roles of special forces just to placate white men with the resulting endangering and lose of lives is indefensible. Given it is a FACT to most people that inferior strength and speed for military personnel in combat roles endangers lives, threatens mission success and endangers the military, should white people, male and female, be banned from special advanced combat forces? While white men might be suited for ordinary infantry, they should be banned from special ops, Green Berets and the Rangers due to their inherent inferior weakness and slowness. Or is the reasoning that inferior strength and speed should disqualify a gender or race flawed? For PC reasons to get around the inferiority of whites, irrelevant standards such as intelligence are added, when what matters is strength and speed. That lives for PC racial slogans of equality should be endangered given that whites are 87% weaker is outrageous. There is no defense to reducing standards and making up irrelevant non-physical standards to allow inferior white men into special forces and advanced combat roles for the PCism theory of the races being identical. For available special forces or other top combat roles, those should go solely to who is measurably the strongest and fastest. If this results in such units being 85% non-white, so be it. The PCism of racial equality setting lower standards just to make it possible for white men in the military to qualify for top combat roles needs to end.