My AR-15 is 'ready for you', Texas lawmaker tells Beto O'Rourke

Words are violence? Why don't you care about Beto's threats of violence towards law abiding citizens who're minding their own business?

 

Exactly!!!!!

O'Dourke initiated the threat.

 

So, you agree that O'Dourke initiated the threat. Good to know.

 

O'Dourke initiated the threat by saying that he (armed government agents) would come to the door to get the AR-15!!!!!!

Try to keep up.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
"REGULATE" !!!! LOL! Uh, I thought righties were against "REGULATE" ...

Only when they're "monopolies" the righties don't like....and then whoopee,"" let's get us some reGUlations!!""

 

The Democratic party sure has gone full Fascist.

 

It is interesting that this picture shows a Russian woodpecker attacking the tree when Trump and Moscow Mitch have done nothing about Russian influence

Ah! Yes! The revolutionary troops about to storm JFK!

 

Really? Specifics please as to how talking about removing some guns is more “fascist” than threatening to shoot someone for talking about removing some guns

 

Talking about? No, he said he'd take them.

It's facist because this megalomaniac would unilaterally attempt to confiscate something that's legal for most citizens in this country to own. Government enacted violence is the logical conclusion of non-compliance. Ruby Ridge and Waco would be laughable in comparison.

 

After he went gun-grabbing at Lexington and Concord.

Molon Labe, motherf*cker...

 

Isn’t that “talking about it “ when you say you would “take” them?

He has not even been elected yet

And he is not talking of taking ALL guns, just the “weapons of war”

 

Name a weapon that hasn't been used in a war.

 

Really? Maybe he just wanted to peacefully turn it in to Beto. He made no more threat than Beto did. What a bunch of weenies.

 

What Foreign Nation if any do you think would be likely to side with the citizens against the US government in a battle over gun rights?

 

He (Beto) was talking about confiscating guns from people who now own them legally. What is your comprehension issue?

 

First! it's just a Liberal DREAM to confiscate Guns and it will never happen, but let's just suppose in some fantasy land that they got their way and Beto and his Nazi's started going door to door to start rounding up those AR-15's. How many do you think they'll find, personally if I knew they were coming, I'd have them locked up in a storage case and buried somewhere they'd NEVER find them and when they showed up, I'd smile and say SORRY! they're not here anymore, because someone broke in and stole them um, so you're outta luck or if they really PISSED me off, I'd drive um down to the worst crime ridden area near me and dump um in the middle of the street with a FREE sign on top of um, because I'd rather give them away then have a Tyrannical Liberal Government confiscate and steal them from me. Sound Good! come on Libby's, Let's have this Fight and see where it gets you.

 

They're not weapons of war. Neither has a selector switch, neither is issued to troops, they're civilian models. There are other guns that fire the same rounds which can be modified to be the same basic thing. Remove these "weapons of war" and you're still stuck at roughly the same levels of homicide by gun, as these "weapons of war" are responsible for a miniscule number of deaths in comparison. So now what? Ban more guns, obviously.

The difference between Beto's talk and the lawmaker's is that Beto's talk is backed by the guarantee of violence, ultimately, as a result of non-compliance, the lawmakers talk is implied violence as a result of violating a constitutional right.

 

An AR-15 is not a weapon of war.

 

Are you kidding me? Removing guns is extremely fascist. That is how fascists keep the people from resisting the will of the state. Threatening to shoot someone for talking about removing guns is only a threat if they actually try to enact the fascist action of removing guns. So don’t ****ing do it, or you will be shot.

 

But we will sure as hell make it a weapon of war if the government tries to take them all.

 

Hard to say. Perhaps a nation that really hates our government, sees it as a threat, and would perceive such a scenario as a good opportunity to create enough chaos that the government couldn't exist afterward as it did before.

 

So don’t regulate polluters and people that own divides that can kill large groups of people but regulate social media companies, weeds, and relationships...

Jesus what a ****ed up ideology

 

I prefer to tell them, face to face if possible, that when they come to take my gun to be careful when reaching for it as the barrel will be very hot.

 

Beto's violence will come in the form of dynamic entries conducted by black clad Ninja so called law enforcement in the middle of the night. You know, the breaching of multiple entrances and use flash/bang grenades. Then off to the gulag for the survivors.

I have what I think is a pretty good idea for stopping gun control and that is to repeal the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act which allows retired LEOs to carry concealed firearms regardless of local or State laws. Treat them like a citizen (a term often used by cops to designate an inferior) and take away their gun rights and see what happens.

 

I guess your use of "devides" means firearms. If so does Lexington and Concord mean anything to you?