Nanothermite's role in 9/11?

Shouldn't there have been more bowling balls in the wreckage?

 

The problem here is that the twoofs have failed to even find out what paint or nanothermite look like under a microscope. They just look at pictures that idiot boy Jones calls nonothermite and assume that that is what it is when, in simple fact, it looks exactly like paint. The conspiracy theorists do not even bother, no matter how many times we tell them that all of the aluminum and silicon are present as KAOLIN, bother to find out what kaolin looks like under a microscope. Total tools, they are.

 

Are you for real??? Do you seriously think that two internet videos comprise unequivocal proof that nanothermite was used to effect a great right wing conspiracy???? Do you have any idea what constitutes actual academic or scientific discourse? Seriously dude.......

 

as usual,your living in denial and have done no research and did not watch that video.you only see what you WANT to see so you wont watch it.you also prove you know nothing at all about the laws of physics.buildings dont topple STRAIGHT DOWN at free fall speed due to fires.If you did not sleep though junior high school science classes you would know this. thats something every kid learns at that age is about the laws of physics.its IMPOSSIBLE for all the steel columns to be removed for the towers to fall straight down like they did at free fall speed.that violates the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years.
oh and all these experinced firemen experienced in the sound of explosives are wrong and the government is right? great comedy relief there.

these disinfo agents here at this site you blindly listen to ignore bld 7 same as you do.you or them have NEVER been able to get around bld 7 which is the crux of the 9/11 coverup commission.bld 7 was a couple of blocks away from the towers,an airliner did not crash into that building.there were buildings MUCH closer to the towers than bld 7 and had FAR MORE EXTENSIVE DAMAGE done to them and FAR MORE INTENSIVE FIRES BLAZING as the pictures prove that day.yet THOSE buildings never collapsed and bld 7 did? you are seriously living in denial and making yourself look foolish ignoring the laws of physics the more you blatantly come on here and ignore the evidence and facts,and hate to break your heart but NIST was caught lying saying there was no molten pools of metal.they PUBLICY say that in a video,firemen have said they saw MANY pools of molten metal.



face it,NIST and the governemnt you worship are lying,those buidings were brought down by explosives.


you crack me up that you worship this MORONIC conspiracy of the governments,its such a laughable fairy tale someone would have to be on drugs to belives .comedy gold.you guys ignore the facts in there everytime.

 

There you go,insult when losing an argument.Bush dupes ignore the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years that every kid in junior high learns that that age and thanks for proving you did not watch that video and your afraid of the truth,hense the childish name calling.

again you cant get around bld 7 that did not have anywhere near the amount of damage done to it that other buildings much closer sustained yet did not collapse,nor can you get around barry jennings testimony.oh and since you prove you stoop to chiildish name calling when you are losing an argument,have fun talking to yourself cause I wont read your next childish post.

 

Translation-I am defeated and cant refute the moronic explanation given by the government with the evidence and facts in that video so I can only sling crap in defeat which is why I wont try and counter that information cause I know I cant.I dont know how to debate.

Run Rifer Run.

 

since Rifer ran away from my challenge to debunk the information in that video I posted and the one that scott posted as well,I will wait to see if YOU will do the same thing.
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/244858-9-11-explained-5-minutes.html

I already know the answer though.we both do.lol. here it is,debunk them.you cant.
sure wish you could learn to be mature and just do the simple thing and admit defeat when your defeated.

I would post that video of scotts but since you already admitted you run away from facts and evidence in videos,that you wont watch them,no sense in me doing so since especially since Rifer ran away from this five minute video with his tail between his legs.so I know you wont sit through a five minute video here since he didnt.I know you too well from past discussions.hahahahahahahahahaahaa

 

and you just go on believeing that since that makes you feel better.

 

I know only the truthers will watch this,they are the only ones who will ever talk about it.the others will just say that proves nothing cause they know they cant debunk it.Nobody ever has been able to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIgoXQWiSlM&feature=related

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaa

 

Is this honestly all you have?

A dumb video and an empty assertion of defeat.

Put it this way kid, if this were a fight, you'd be a fat kid with bad acne, no arms. No Legs. And I'm an Abrams tank.

You epitomize the epic failure of 911 truth.

You're obviously a neck down 911 truther with no clue about any of the subject matter you find so convincing. No knowledge to determine good information from bad information.

You're an ideologue, even though you most likely don't know what that is, with some screwed up agenda to fight ghosts in a machine for snake oil salesmen who make their livings dumbing down any and every gullible fool that crosses their path.

And what's funny about it is, as time passes your posts will be retained on the internet for future generations of knowledgable people to laugh at.

 

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Main_Page

http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/home

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html

http://www.architectureweek.com/2002/0529/news_3-1.html

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64959841/9119ProgressReport022912_rev1_030112web.pdf

http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

http://www.debunking911.com/index.html

Debunked.

And I didn't even have to say anything.

If you wish to debate actual specifics let me know, but you won't.

Because you just can't.

 

Of course, that alone proves inside job

 

no YOU wont and cant.as usual you get your rear end handed to you on a platter.those DEB WUNKER sites have been debunked by Grifffins book DEBUNKING THE 9/11 DEBUNKING,an answer to popular mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory.Obviously you have never read it.

NOBODY including your ramblings and your DEB WUNKING links have ever been able to debunk his book.In your fairy tale land you live in,you will think so but they havent.

Griffin has challenged the mainstream media and congress to debate him out in public on all the airways but those cowards wont do it because like NIST,they have to lie about everything.AGAIN NIST was caught lying,you cant do anything about that and again you CANT debunk bld 7 either or Barry Jennings testimony and your running away by posting DEB WUNKER links that have been debunked.

the more and more you try and dodge bld 7 and the testimony of barry jennings,the more and more moronic your posts are,you and nobody else has ever been able to get around the fact that all those buildings that were much closer were damaged FAR MORE EXTENSIVELY than bld 7 and had FAR MORE SEVERE FIRES and yet they did not collapse.hahahahahahahahaahahhahahaa

you always cling to the hysterical COINCIDENCE THEORY that all 3 buildings owned by jew larry Silverstein-I say jew not because I am anti-semitic,but because he is part of the zionest mossad connection who was behind it all.I would refer you to a video to watch that proves it but we both know, you wont watch it.you cling to the COINCIDENCE THEORY that the only 3 buildings in the area that collapsed were owned by Silverstein

comedy gold the way you embrace that coincidence theory.hahahahahahahahahaahaha

since you obviously slept through junior high school science classes and dont know anything at all about the laws of physics scientists have gone by for thousands of years,something every kid learns at that age,then your posts have no credibility.

Learn about the laws of physics from some junior high school teacher.they will be happy to explain them to you.Come back next semester from now after you have learned about them and can have a rational discussion without referring to DEB WUNKER links that Griffins book has debunked and we'll talk then.till then,Im done with you.

That post wasnt for you anyways,none of your deb wunker linkes debunks that five minute video youu ran away from again.I Know that breaks your heart but your going to have to deal with it. you want to reply to me,go ahead,you will just be talking to yourself since you refuse to acknowledge defeat and wont watch that 5 minute video. and obvioulsy dont know anything about the laws of physics.when you learn about them,we'll talk.

I would refer you to read Griffins book but we both already know you wont do that.I have issued that challenge to HUNDREDS of people on the net and everytime i issue that challenge and ask them to come back a month from now and discuss it with me,whats wrong with it,they never take me up on that challenge and run away by posting DEB WUNKER links like you have that he has debunked in his book.hahahahahahahahahahahaahahaa
anytime I ask people in REAL LIFE to read that book,they get it because they cant hide behind a computer and post DEB WUNKER links that his book debunks.

so me and you both know you wont be the first out of hundreds I have issued it to to read it either.You already ran away from that five minute video refusing to admit defeat so that tells me right there,you wont read the book either.

again,when you learn about the laws of physics,we'll talk after you contact that junior high school teacher,till then you'll have to find someone else to fall for your propaganda,your DEB WUNKER links dont work on me.Unlike you,I have read Griffins book.find someone else to try and fool into thinking you have debunked anything. chances are though they wont fall for your deb wunker linkes either though because unlike you,they know about the laws of physics as wel and probably also have read the book.lol.

oh the ONE link that you posted architectural link,yeah I can see how you would be fooled into believing that ASCE would be a good source to think they know what they are talking about.if I wasnt a serious researcher,I would fall for that link as well but what you dont get and will live in denial about,is those people there at ASCE, if they dont go along with the governments version and tell the truth to what REALLY happened,they will lose their jobs.many have for speaking out and telling the truth.Thats something you need to deal with but obviously wont.

 

oh and your running again getting desperate referring to DEB WUNKER links,cause NONE of that debunks that video.seriously,you need to give it up with these DEB WUNKER links,you can fool others maybe with your deb wunker linkes but you CANT fool me with your propaganda.it wont work on me.again I have read griffins book and again his book debunks your deb wunker links whether you want to believe it or not.again till you learn about the laws of physics that every juniour high school kid learns at that age,you wont have any credibility around here with other truthers.ESPECIALLY me.

 

No one believes towers came down so uniformly without explosives being placed strategically throughout the bldg. If they do, then they do not understand how structure is overdesigned for load, and inner core of building cannot collapse without detonation on each floor section, because inner core is in complete compression carrying the load of the entire building already. So no collapsing floorload above any section of each inner core section adds any more load than the inner core is already supporting, even considering force magnified by gravitational acceleration, because of safety factor of 10 times loadcapacity as typical design safety factor. And no way that every core shears reinforced connections exactly uniformly in such a way that building collapses so perfectly in line in its own footprint.

Also no one should believe that every floor sheared connections exactly at the same time. Nor even that all steel reached temperature high enough to buckle simultaneously and so exactly, that all floors would fall so perfectly in straight line. Steel structure that carries load is typically overdesigned several times to account for additional loads as much as 10 times the loads expected to be on any floor. Thats the "safety" factor.

Then there is fire coating and other fire retardant that insulates steel. There is also sprinkler system, so if sprinkler system was working which it was that day, temperature is lowered. No way that fuel burning transmitted enough of a high temperature to cause overdesigned steel and hardened inner elevator core to collapse so suddenly and uniformly. Just not possible, and never in history is there any example of any building that collapsed like these towers and like bldg 7, unless explosive charges placed strategically are detonated uniformly and at same instant. Otherwise bldg will always topple to one side or the other. Anybody who argues this is a rambling idiot and I wont waste my time on.LOL! they must really think we Americans are total idiots to expect us to believe this crap.LOL.

 

He laughs hysterically, which kind of fits in.

 

A lot of the fire retardant had been removed because it was made from asbestos. The main retardant was 4 inches of concrete, thought to give up to two hours of time to put a fire out. That was obviously overcome by thousands of pounds of jet fuel and multiple floor fires that the firemen could not put out.

 

The moron who put that together has the investigative skills of an 80-year-old Alzheimer's patient on pot. They talk about explosions with no time frame attached.

And don't bother telling me how that charlatan
Griffen ties any of this crap together. I have better credentials than that piece of crap when it comes to investigating a fire and it is my honest professional opinion that he would better spend his time teaching retarded kids how to weave baskets.

And that **** MacQueen should have to go and tell a station full of FDNY fire fighters what he thinks the reports of explosions mean. He is then on his own in dealing with it if one of them decides he needs a hydrant wrench up side the head.

He should have stuck to teaching college kids the Bodhisatvah tales.

 

I see the shills are angry and cant accept defeat.no surpriseThey can only sling crap in defeat like the monkeys they are and cry and.amazing how many people here are so much in denial they dont know anything at all about the laws of physics scientists have gone by for thousands of years that every junior high school kid learns.many people here obviously ditched junior high school science classes.a FACT.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaahhahaahahhahahhhahahhahhahahahahhahhahaha

rolls on floor laughing.the more and more you try and get around bld 7,the more and more moronic your posts are ,you all know it,I know it,can work on someone else here maybe but not me,unlike you guys,I did not ditch junior high school science classes.
keep on dodging Barry jennings testimony and bld 7,your posts are comedy gold to truthers by doing so.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahhahahahaa

oh and since there are a couple of Bush dupes that just came here recently,as I said earlier,you are talking to yourself when addressing my posts,i dont read them.NET people always demostrate they only see what they WANT to see and i dont discuss 9/11 anymore,as i said on another thread,its the least of our problems we have to deal with from the government now.

I dont debate people who only read PARTS of posts and only see what they want to see and refuse to watch videos.thats a trait all Bush dupes always prove they do constantly all the time.

 

Speaking of flinging (*)(*)(*)(*) around,and up pops 9/11WAIJ,who might 'nto' have ditched high school science classes,but the college ones are in doubt

 

I learned a long time ago Bush dupes on the net are a waste of time,that they are afraid of the truth and only see what they want to see and never watch videos or read Griffins book.They dont know how to debate and never learned debating skills that you ALWAYS take up your opponents challenge to try and counter the facts he brings up and not run away from the evidence they present you,anytime somone refers me to a book or video to watch,I ALWAYS take them up on the challenge,they are too easy to debunk.None of those links debunk Griffins book or that video.

obviously none of the Bush dupes here have read his book and I see that the paid shills are all out in force as usual.Their handlers sure are worried that i am talking about Griffins book I see.so they come on and fling crap in defeat like the monkeys they are.hahahahahahaa

till a Bush dupe is willing to read that book and admit defeat,I wont talk to them.

 

Speculation is not evidence.

 

Till an official conspiracy theory apologist admits they ditched junior high school science classes or at least confesses they dont remember anything they were taught back then and that they cant get around bld 7 and that they know nothing at all about the laws of physics scientists have gone by for thousands of years because their memory has faded from them from back then and say they will read griffins book and are mature enough to admit defeat after that and admit these are valild points they cant get around as well which nobody has done yet,I wont debate them since they are too scared and afraid to admit defeat since they have only been seeing what they WANT to see.Till THAT happens,they are just talking to themselves when talking to me when adressing these posts.hahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahhaaha

I made it perfectly clear on that other thread,I dont discuss 9/11 anymore with people who are afraid of the truth and only see what they want to see.

 

I will confess that I have a lot of experience in physics, mechanics, and electronics and see nothing out of the ordinary when closely examined. Only when you buy into ridiculous conspiracy theories do you close your mind off to the facts and become a true believer, much like any religion and only see heretics that do not believe as you do.

 

Perhaps if someone hadn't ditched elementary school English classes, their point might be taken more seriously.

Ladies and Gentlemen: I give you the very face of the defunct 'truth movement'.