NASA Data: Earth Cooled by Half a Degree Celsius From '16-'18 Read Newsmax: Earth Cooled by Half a

State governmemts do not create local independent school districts at all

As time goes on the feds and states assume more control but even they cannot be everywhere at once

For instance in Fort Worth parents of a middle school were aurprised to learn their kids were being taught homosexualty

The lib teachers and principle forbade the children from taking their learning material home but some did

That is liberalism in its most basic form destroying the public education system

 

Not if there are any people to buy their products.

 

Of course, they do. Local government is totally controlled by the states.

Uh huh.

ROFL. Teachers were showing them how to be homosexuals? You've taken leave of your senses.

A flat lie, no doubt, you either made up or are gullible enough to believe.

What's you believing and/or spreading a lie? Is that your brand of "conservatism in its most basic form?"

 

Huh? There will be people to buy stuff--well, unless the robots snuff us out.

 

You claim people will be out of work because of robots but that they will have money to buy stuff. Again, are you pushing socialism? WTF?

 

I can't vouch for the senses thing, but that's not what he said about middle schoolers. He said they were being taught about homosexuality, not how to be homosexual.

 

The class was bad enough that the lib teachers did not want parents to see the textbooks

I meant to post this link before but here it is now

http://www.star-telegram.com/news/local/education/article211334574.html

“Parents and critics of the curriculum have complained that they were not allowed to review the textbook.”

 

We won't be using work as the metric for distributing income and wealth if the vast majority of people are unable to make an economic contribution because they cost more to train and supervise than they produce. Do you think the unwanted will curl up and die for the convenience of those still wanted?

 

Dude, out of work people don't have money for widgets.

 

They could read the materials, but they couldn't veto their use. I'd bet they could pull their kids from the lesson. Their beef is with the other kids knowing.

Trans kids are **HERE** and not going away. Do those complaining parents want to have their children disciplined by the school for inappropriate behavior around trans students? How are kids supposed to know how to behave if no one explains to them about trans people?

 

I took him at his word.

BTW, trans people may or may not be homosexual. Why would he object to students finding out about transgenders?

 

Sure it is bad for you because it seems expatpanama has some basic education.

But it is not out of contest, it is laughing at climate science trying to weasel they way out of the simple question "what is that which warming?"

100% of climate scientists can answer this simple question and 100% of published peer reviewed scientific article weasel in all possible way around it.

I am not even asking such simple questions as

2.what is warming?

3. what is cooling?

4. why am I asking these questions?

Any believer, skeptic?

1. what is that which is warming? (by expatpanama)

2.what is warming?

3. what is that which is cooling?

4. why am I, we asking these questions?

 

“[Lord Kelvin’s] success as a synthesizer of theories about energy places him in the same position in 19th-century physics that Sir Isaac Newton has in 17th-century physics or Albert Einstein in 20th-century physics. All of these great synthesizers prepared the ground for the next grand leap forward in science.”

https://www.britannica.com/biography/William-Thomson-Baron-Kelvin

Newton, Kelvin and Einstein had very different from each other and from the present consensus beliefs about the age of the Earth.

That didn’t bother them to come up with sets of propositions which are in “far reaching agreement’’ with each other and which still stand to be “true or nearly true” as of today.

Another far reaching and fundamental agreement between them was that they would never think to impose their personal beliefs as true or nearly true on other people, because such an imposition is extremely anti-scientific, it is extremist and totalitarian.

And the third far reaching and fundamental agreement between them was that for the same reason they had no regards for scientific consensus and empirical evidence.

All American institutions of higher education imposing consensus and empirical evidence as something which not only has a relation to material sciences, but often as a base of material sciences are imposing totalitarianism where one is not allowed to have a dissenting belief or view, and where one is not allowed even to ask questions without been mocked, ridiculed and even, as in the totalitarian USSR, announced to be mentally ill.

Freedom to dissent from a common view and freedom to ask questions is not only an essence of America, of what was America founded to be about, but it is an essence of material sciences.

The belief is that one has to be an atheist and belong to a certain party to understand science comes straight from the USSR, it is extremely anti-American.

The belief that CO2 or any other gas can warm or cool anything is far more idiotic than the belief that the earth is 6000 years old, especially when in reality hardly anybody believes in the latter while 97% of population are brainwashed in school and institutions of higher education to believe in the former.

The belief that CO2 or any other gas can change something which does not change by definition and even something which does not exist and has never been defined or described is so absurd that I cannot find word to describe it while 97% of population are brainwashed in school and institutions of higher education to believe in such irrational absurd.

“Another of the qualities of science is that it teaches the value of rational thought as well as the importance of freedom of thought; the positive results that come from doubting that the lessons are all true”. 1969. Richard Feynman, Nobel Prize winner, atheist.

Obviously, Kelvin, Newton, Einstein and I fully agree, no matter what out personal beliefs are.

If the 97% prevails we are back in the USSR:

 

I suspect you're not answering these questions because you deny any and all data related to climate science and which could be used to answer them. Am I right?

 

You see, you quoted my words:

I am not even asking such simple questions.

Let me repeat, you quoted my words :

I am not even asking such simple questions.

I am sorry that you cannot see a difference between asking and answering.

I did not not hurt you.

You did.

While omitting an important comment of mine:




[/QUOTE]

 

Home schooled creationist?

 

Sure, along with Newton, Kelvin, Einstein and Feynman as I outlined in all details in my post you replied to :

http://politicalforum.com/index.php...oled-by-half-a.532916/page-22#post-1069129055

Any other questions, comments to the post http://politicalforum.com/index.php...oled-by-half-a.532916/page-22#post-1069129055 ?

Meanwhile my question:

A democrat?

 

This is the cognitive distortion called mind reading.

 

I might vote NDP.

But anyway, you're saying there's more evidence for the Earth being around 6000 yrs old than CO2 being a greenhouse gas?

 

Unless there is a doomsday asteroid about to hit Earth, it is of no consequence to me personally if there was some cooling or warming somewhere on Earth in the last year, 10 years ago or 100 years ago.

 

Erm, what about warming in the future?

 

Not surprised someone gets their science from a comedian.

 

Oh, I just got served.
I can't give reference to NASA OR John Oliver.

 

Science is built of facts the way a house is built of bricks; but an accumulation of facts is no more science than a pile of bricks is a house. ~ Henri Poincare

 

So, I take it you don't believe in evolution either?