@Nasa The speed of light is point to point displacement .

Sounds like a Stephen King story , I know ! But physically possible . If field mass increases it will become denser as the moons expansion is already showing us . The moons field mass is increasing and that is pushing it away .

 

Regardless or whether or not your "science" makes sense (it doesn't) or whether your "mathematics" supports your "science" (it doesn't), I cannot even parse the above into intelligible English.

If English isn't your first language then you may want to spend a little more time on the translation - or better yet, spend time on the mathematics which is language agnostic. If English is your first language, then you may want to review what you've typed a little more.

 

Oh shut up . if you can't read that and understand it , you must be illiterate not me .

 

You might think that the following is intelligible but it simply isn't.

Perhaps you are in a hurry, but a few more conjunctions would at least make the English more readable. It wouldn't make the science any less wrong or the maths any less absent, but at least we'd have a fighting chance to understand what you're trying to say.

 

I am writing in English the same as you !

I can read your English so therefore you are full of beans .

Field mass density increases from the c.o.m , outwards , (the inverse) .

The field matter will increase in solidity .

N>N

 

I drew you a quick diagram , purple is expanding that pushes things away or pushes itself away like the moon is doing .



It's ''filling up'' ...........

 

I added a scale for you , the inflow energy increases the potential density .

 

Understand , space-time is isotropically inverted to the c.o.m , an inflow of energy under centripetal force .

The c.o.m's center of mass density being an higher state energy than the lower state invert energy . The lower state attracted to the higher state as the higher state has inertia .

Electromagnetic radiation is pulled out of the Sun by the lower energy state field matter aether . This energy then traverses linear paths and is then re-attracted to higher energy state atomic mass that is in inertia orbits .

Free bodies continue in motion attracted to the lesser energy state of the field matter ahead of the body unless it crosses the path of an external force , higher density field matter or higher density atomic matter in which the body will then alter its path .

Newtons law of motion advanced my dear chap .

 

I didn't know we had magic mushroom thread on PF

 

Rough sketch, told you I was good at science .

 

I'm good at my chit ............no need for shrooms ,

 

v ( c) = F< E

This says the velocity of light is equal to the force of a lesser energy states attraction . Simple thermodynamics !

When you emit a laser , the force keeping it a linearity is infinite .


Demo

Laser>...........lesser energy infinite space................


added : I know my stuff , if you want me to write it up properly, alls people ever needed to do was to show a little mutual respect .

Science forums kept banning me , members calling me all sorts , even got stalkers who follow me around to try and get me banned . I am the real deal in physics , if I get shown no mutual respect then i will act like a dick ed .

You could have me for £500 a week , I'm not greedy . Full consultation and I will write you the book .

It will take about 6 month to the write the book , it involves the entirety of physics .

This weeks deal , buy one book, The Universe inside and out !

Get the second book , Making use of the Universe ! free

The second book will have all the possible technology ideas I can think up .

 

The Universe inside and out !

Author: TBA

Introduction.

The Universe inside and out is a journey of discovery that considers past science and present science . A journey of discover that will advance present science thoughts and theory , opening up a whole new era of science in regards to physics and physical process .


Are you really going to try and say , that the above is not readable or understandable ?

 

I'm really sorry but the highlighted sentence simply isn't intelligible English. Forget that your so-called "science" is nonsense, just make what you type readable English - please.

 

No it doesn't. It says that the velocity of light (measured in metres per second) is equal to some force (measured in newtons) which is less that some energy (measured in joules, or electron volts or something). The units of the equation don't even match.

It's as nonsensical as saying that my height (measured in metres) is the same as a magnetic field (measured in teslas) which is less than the temperature (measured in kelvin).

 

Earth's moon is moving away at the rate of 3.8cm per year.
It’s driven by the effect of the Moon’s gravity on the rotating Earth. Tides raised in the oceans cause drag and thus slow the Earth’s spin-rate. The resulting loss of angular momentum is compensated for by the Moon speeding up, and thus moving further away.

 

Just no ! If the moons speed was to increase it would lose its attachment to the earths gravitational pull and not follow the equilibrium of force of the gravitational curvature path . It would simply fly off in a linearity direction !

The expansion of the moon away from the earth is field matter density increase proportional to the invert .

The moon absorbs the suns energy that traverses through space , it also absorbs the earths energy that traverses through space . The moon is absorbing more energy than it is losing , hence an increase in field density that pushes it away from the earths field .
Not much difference than how metal expands when heated , except you can't see it because the fields are invisible , but you can see the effects , i'e expansion .

You probably call it dark matter but in reality it is an invisible matter .

 

Hmm, I defined it , so it says exactly what I said it says .

Why are you trying to change my defining ?

 

Why do you keep coming back to this forum spouting the same gibberish?

 

Kindly provide a link to an astrophysicist that supports your claim.

 

Its not gibberish , its universal mechanics , quite an easy subject once you get your head around it .
Your practically saying hot air does not rise , you know , hot embers travel up , thermal tunnel , space elevator .

The fire is attracted to the outer atmosphere because it is a less energy state thats why fire points up .

Do some work yourselves lazy scientists .

 

Physics supports it , basic science principles , enthalpy also playing a role .

 

this thread..............

 

I love these trolls who post stupid little things , showing their mediocre minded mentality ! People who have ''smarts'' would find an argument to show where my notions are flawed .

Something you can't do !

P.s As it stands , I haven't give you enough information to make that spaceship work .

 

I asked you a valid question; what astrophysicist supports your claim?