Discussion in 'United States' started by flyboy56, Nov 19, 2018.
So you’re just paranoid and completely out of touch for no reason?
Does this country look like Britain to you?
Since you offer no clear debate and nothing but annoying insults, we're done... Putting you on ignore.
You’re screaming and crying about the scary evil Muslims for nothing. You don’t have any priorities you have a complex, an unwanted one at that.
I'm guessing you were being facetious when asking why it took the dems so long and aren't in agreement with them?
Congress opens its sessions with Christian prayers.
Double standards, much???
ONLY if a Pastafarain, https://www.wikihow.com/Become-a-Pastafarian, if ever elected is allowed to wear their religious headcovering
Back in the 1970s Bella Abzug spoke in Congressional hearings with her hat on.
good thing we have separation of church and state in the USA
Er, baseball caps and beanies don't cover the wearers' faces? ( )
It is an idiotic and arcane rule that should be changed.
so you're fine with MAGA hats in the house chamber worn by members of congress...
If there is a campaign to be waged, rights to be defended, freedom and choice to be accentuated, it should that of the liberation of our sisters in the world . What ensnares and holds them back is an enemy. Any system that oppresses them must fall.
Wear symbols of that movement in the Congress of the United States.
oh me me, let me! ........ Misogynists!!!!
cause this rule dates back to men and their hats... slap em with dat label
OK, I'll bite. How is it moving the goal posts to mention that the Bible has some horrendous passages in response to someone pointing out that the Quran has some horrendous passages?
Trump about religion
allowing anyone to wear religious garb on the floor of congress is a promotion of that religion and shouldn't be allowed
telling how liberals will forget all about their obsessive campaign against religion being allowed in the public square unless it is Islam of coarse
and if you asked 40 years ago would gays ever be allowed to legally marry they would have given the same answer you just gave
They're not religious statements??
No, only football helmets and all must be alike. I think that only NY giant helmets be allowed.
I tend to agree with that. All religious clothing and symbols are IMO superstitious nonsense and all should be banned from congress - heck I'd even extend that to government buildings. That would also include religious symbols like stars of David, crosses and whatnot worn as jewellery. It would be more tricky to determine whether or not someone is wearing religious undergarments but I'd do away with those too.
I suspect that liberals would also fight to allow a Jewish man to wear his yarmulke and a Sikh to wear his turban or patka. I'm not sure whether there are some Christian religious sects which require members to wear headgear, but I wouldn't be shocked to find liberals fighting to allow those to be worn too.
Unless you view Trumpism as some kind of cult
I'll bet you were careful when you typed 'cult'?
Yes, but Pastawater law!
No one was brave enough to tell her to remove it; she packed a mean wallop.
Separate names with a comma.