New York Times chief outlines coverage shift: From Trump-Russia to Trump racism

BIASED New York Times will now be focusing on a different narrative: Trump's racism. Whatever happened to just focusing on reporting the news? What a bunch of JOKERS!

New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet said:

"I think that we've got to change. The Times must write more deeply about the country, race, and other divisions.

I mean, the vision for coverage for the next two years is what I talked about earlier: How do we cover a guy who makes these kinds of remarks? How do we cover the world's reaction to him? How do we do that while continuing to cover his policies? How do we cover America, that's become so divided by Donald Trump? That, to me, is the vision for coverage. You all are going to have to help us shape that vision. But I think that’s what we’re going to have to do for the rest of the next two years."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...erage-shift-from-trump-russia-to-trump-racism

 

Cant say the times isnt the left arm of the dirty dems. Trump is right yet again. And if you noticed , you cant find a Russian story on here anymore , all the paid posters got their memo.

 

@Golem doesn't even think the Russia investigation is over!

 

The New York Times is nothing more than birdcage liner

 

I didnt say they were the smartest cookies.

 

Another use that comes to mind is ass wiping in the event of running out of toilet paper.

 

We have a liberal moron in hollywood named Sheryl Crow who worries about toilet papers denuding the rainforest

She wants everyone to use their finger instead

 

The divided house in itself will not stand... So the division is a huge problem which can cause unthinkable tragedies in the most armed state on the planet with the most armed population among the other countries. However in the place of NY Times editor I would try to concentrate on his own activity and things he does. Perhaps it divides a nation even more than any of Trump's actions. Perhaps. But that is an internal american policy. I don't want more sanctions for Russia just because someone might read this and start to think...
It is up to americans who will be their next president a millionaire, a redneck, a lesbian, a catholic, a crippled afroamerican lesbian or a world champion in a sort of marital arts. There are too many NY and other times to affect this choice for me to become another one. This market niche is already too much.

 

To become another what?

 

To become another russian throll who influences the decisions of americans and meddles in internal american policy.

 

Meanwile....

https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/16/hillary-clinton-emails-cryptic-gmail/

 

Is Baquet a Democrat? He could focus upon the fact that at the start of the American
Civil War that not a single Republican owned a slave. That during the Jim Crow days
no Republican supported segregation. And during the days of the KKK no Republican
was a KKK. If there must be a discussion about American racism then it must start
right here.

 

Federal Republicans or all?

 

@Poohbear?

 

What are you talking about?

 

I am talking about unwanted history. Subtly erased from American history.
It is the Democrats with the long history of racism - now blamed on the
Republicans, or whites, or American society - never Democrats.

 

"I think that the guy is lazy. And it’s probably not his fault, because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control.”

 

You got nothing on the Aussies here.

 

Federal Republicans or all?

 

Why do you mention this?

 

What about the Aussies?

 

he's at the antisemitism now too

https://www.juancole.com/2019/08/supremacist-american-democrats.html

This though is to be expected given that antisemitism no longer means racism towards Jews or a hatred of Jews for being 'Jews' but criticism of Israel.

 

How is this relevant to this thread?

 

check out the title.

 

Do you agree with the article that you quoted?