NFL WILL FINE TEAMS WHOSE PLAYERS KNEEL DURING NATIONAL ANTHEM

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Bluebird, May 23, 2018.

  1. altmiddle

    altmiddle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2017
    Messages:
    1,483
    Likes Received:
    961
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What they were or were not intending to disrespect or protest is irrelevant. We stand for the anthem, put our hands over our heart, and face the flag and it is considered disrespectful not to do that - period. I agree the reason they are doing it is not about the flag, but when you choose to protest (or talk, play on your phone...) during the anthem (pledge, moment of silence, prayer...) you are being disrespectful to the things that are being honored.
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  2. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My lord, let me try this again... The Constitution does not require me to like your speech, nor do the principles of free speech. A person who is offended a fellow citizen’s speech may turn off the TV. This is what happened in the case of the NFL, causing them to lose enough money to make a policy change.
     
    jay runner and Ddyad like this.
  3. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,331
    Likes Received:
    15,851
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which is what I said in my previous post. Clearly you are only looking to troll. Bye.
     
    Matt84 likes this.
  4. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Non sequitur: You are calling out Kaepernik detractors as hypocrites if they also claim to value the Constitution. The two are not rationally-related. One can be offended by free speech and still support it. When one of these "hypocrites" calls for Kaepernik to be thrown in jail for his actions, you let me know. Then you'll have a case.
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  5. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You do agree a person has a legal right to be disrespectful however, right?
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  6. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nonsense. It is a tradition that many people enjoy. And in that context it is unpopular to disrespect that tradition. The employer sets the rules -- and in this case in conjunction with the union as the NFL is governed under collective bargaining. They make all kinds of rules based on how players may behave (on and off the field), how the uniform is to be worn, and how the game is played. They even make rules about how long you can dance in the end zone. Aghast! I don't see you complaining about that "free speech violation." If they player doesn't like the rule, he doesn't have to play the game.

     
    Ddyad likes this.
  7. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,331
    Likes Received:
    15,851
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean like Trump who thinks those who kneel..."maybe you shouldn't be in the country." or "shouldn't be playing"?
     
    Bluebird likes this.
  8. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,471
    Likes Received:
    25,441
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Irritate your customers and they go away - so complicated. ;-)
     
    jay runner and Bow To The Robots like this.
  9. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here is a little civics lesson for you: the president’s opinion is not law. And the president has the same free speech rights as you and is certainly allowed to state his opinion publicly.

    And if you're trying to claim Trump stated Kaepernik should be in jail, I'd like to see a citation, please.
     
    Last edited: May 24, 2018
    Ddyad likes this.
  10. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,331
    Likes Received:
    15,851
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And I support his right to free speech. As such I will not boycott watching him on TV like the Constitution-loving frauds did with the NFL games.
     
    Bluebird and Ddyad like this.
  11. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,471
    Likes Received:
    25,441
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is your choice. Get it? :)
     
  12. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    With the exception of child pornography, you are free to consume or refuse to consume any content you see fit. Refusing to consume content with which you disagree or that you find offensive does not make you a fraud.
     
  13. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't think he does. :eyepopping:
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  14. Russ103

    Russ103 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2014
    Messages:
    7,595
    Likes Received:
    3,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What’s “pathetically sad” is your (and your fellow lefties) ignorance on the 1A, which you demonstrate by linking to a private employers imposing workplace rules.
     
  15. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    13,235
    Likes Received:
    3,932
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I keep hearing the notion that this isnt about disrespect for the flag. That characterization is wrong on every level.

    - For starters, Kaepernicks exact words were "I wont stand to show pride for a flag for a country that oppresses black people". If that doesnt express a desire to disrespect the flag, then nothing does.

    - On top of that, It is nonsensical to claim that a protest against the flag/ national anthem is not about the flag/ anthem, and is instead only about the issue that they are trying to highlight. If I decided to bring attention to the issues surrounding the metoo movement by publically punching you in the nose, you wouldnt accept the notion that this has nothing to do with your nose.
     
    JakeJ likes this.
  16. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,331
    Likes Received:
    15,851
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offensive content is not the same as someone kneeling. These same people go on and on about how the Constitution is freedom and what this country was built on, etc, etc. Yet when some guys expressed their freedom of speech these same Freedom loving people held their breath and stomped their feet like a 5 yr olds. I'm guessing you were one of them?
     
    Bluebird likes this.
  17. Bluebird

    Bluebird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    6,084
    Likes Received:
    822
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here is a quote by another poster that echo's my sentiment exactly---
    "It is a culture war on freedom of speech. It isn't surprising that the typical football fan can't understand that what the flag represents is the right being denied. There is no better way of disrespecting the flag than to deny basic rights. Yeah, the NFL is in bad spot. And frankly I could care less except that popular opinion is to deny freedom of speech. That is pathetically sad and hypocritical. And it is a war on freedom of speech started by trump."
     
  18. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    13,235
    Likes Received:
    3,932
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Since you seem so convinced that this is a constitutional/freedom of speech issue.....Can you explain how mandating that they wear their socks over their calfs, or that they cannot have 2 people with a coordinated celebration dance is not ALSO an infringement upon their right to free speech? How do those examples differ constitutionally from mandating that they stand for the anthem?
     
    JakeJ likes this.
  19. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The players have freedom of speech at the expensive of their employers. But if someone protests removing a Confederate statutes they should be denied a permit to protest, shouted down and attacked.
     
  20. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    13,235
    Likes Received:
    3,932
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You ignored the totality of my post, but even in your reply, how exactly is refusing to stand for the flag because of the "rights being denied" NOT an example of disrespecting the flag?

    Your position makes no sense whatsoever.
     
  21. tharock220

    tharock220 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2016
    Messages:
    2,816
    Likes Received:
    1,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Seeing as how NFL fines are paid by money disbursed by the league, the teams don't really have a choice. Everyone on the field next season will be standing, and there's nothing you can do about it.
     
  22. Bluebird

    Bluebird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    6,084
    Likes Received:
    822
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So,today(your words) these" spoiled self important jackasses",get their rights taken away & what happens tomorrow when perhaps your rights are taken away? Would you protest?
     
  23. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,331
    Likes Received:
    15,851
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Again my point wasn't about what the employer is doing. I know the employer can mandate certain things. I think the mandate is silly.

    They can have 2 or more people with a coordinated dance. Sock height doesn't really seem to be a freedom of speech thing to me but whatever.
     
  24. therooster

    therooster Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2014
    Messages:
    13,004
    Likes Received:
    5,494
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So soccer becomes even bigger ? What the f do3s a aussie care about American football ? American football will die if these idiots pit themselves against the American flag . Bank on it .
     
  25. therooster

    therooster Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2014
    Messages:
    13,004
    Likes Received:
    5,494
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They should bomb Australia.
     

Share This Page