OK, there are 2 conflicting opinions on the collapse of WTC7...

Discussion in '9/11' started by SamSkwamch, Jun 19, 2016.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. SamSkwamch

    SamSkwamch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Opinion 1: Office fires caused column 79 to fail. This led to the total collapse we all witnessed which showed a sudden onset, symmetry, speed that accelerated to that of gravity, which culminated with the building landing in its own basement.

    Opinion 2: The use of carefully placed and well timed explosives led to the total collapse we all witnessed which showed a sudden onset, symmetry, speed that accelerated to that of gravity, which culminated with the building landing in its own basement.

    With that in mind please check this out. The famous Riviera hotel was just pulled:

    [video=youtube;P2-vq9Co3yk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2-vq9Co3yk[/video]

    Since it is safe to assume that carefully placed and well timed explosives were used in the above example, I have one simple question:

    WHY DID THEY NOT JUST LIGHT A FEW ROOMS ON FIRE INSTEAD OF PAYING AN EXORBITANT FEE TO A PROFESSIONAL DEMOLITION TEAM?
     
  2. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This has got to be the worse 9/11 conspiracy thread I have ever seen ... whuh? ...
     
  3. SamSkwamch

    SamSkwamch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Lol at "conspiracy thread."

    It is a simple question. Why would the Riviera folks pay for a professional demolition with costly explosives when they could just light a few rooms on fire for the cost of the matches and get the same results?
     
  4. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The above is a NIST "probable collapse initiation theory" (as NIST states) based on a scientific fraud.

    The above is a theory based on the most likely probability that could have caused the global collapse of WTC7 because CD is the only known cause of global building collapses.

    The CD of the Riviera differed from the WTC7 collapse. Before the lights went out, you could see the building being taken down in parts (right side first), unlike WTC7 which dropped in one piece.

    The question may be "simple" but the answer if far from simple. There are many theories going around about why the building had to be totally destroyed, the primary one being that the SEC's ENRON investigation data had to be vaporized. Others include that Giuliani's command center in WTC7 may have doubled as a control center for the destruction of the twin towers so the evidence had to be demolished. Then there's also Lucky Larry's windfall. These are just some of the theories. Who knows if any or a combination are real or not.
     
  5. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    because your premise is stupid and childish ... controlled demos in Las Vegas are just another part of the sideshow that Vegas is ...

    and that had no similarties to WTC 7 ... same building design? ...

    so, I take it that you believe that a high cost team had to rig WTC7? ... expound on that if you will ...
     
  6. SamSkwamch

    SamSkwamch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You are making a simple question way harder on yourself. You seem to do this habitually. The purpose of a CD is to make the building land in its own footprint so as not to damage the surrounding area. Until 9/11, we always assumed that carefully placed and well timed explosives were necessary to accomplish such a feat for a steel framed building, but on that day we learned that we could accomplish the same thing by lighting the building on fire.

    Understand now?

    So, again:

    It is a simple question. Why would the Riviera folks pay for a professional demolition with costly explosives when they could just light a few rooms on fire for the cost of the matches and get the same results?
     

Share This Page