Oklahoma sex offender fatally shot his wife, her 3 kids and 2 teen girls before killing himself, pol

you labor under the delusion that 1) you can get rid of guns in a country where you don't count
2) and doing so wouldn't cause massive upheavals.

 

Completely absurd.

 

I think I know American gun owners far better than you do.

 

Sorry you failed to show that it is self evident.

From an absurd claim.

Again based on an absurd claim.

You are failing to persuade me that we need to amend the constitution.

 

it is based on your absurd comments. just calling everything you don't like absurd is not how you persuade people to amend the constitution.

this is why we don't have gun control and I thank you.

 

the attitudes of the anti gunners-especially ones who aren't even citizens-are really good arguments why those who want a free America should oppose gun banning

 

Oh no wonder the ignorance of the subject.

You know what they say, misery loves company.

 

I am not involved in shoot outs. those are typically gangsters.

 

foreign gun banners prove Aesop's wisdom over and over. They are treated like irresponsible little children by their control freak government and they hate the fact that we are not

 

It's worse than that. they don't want our crime rate to drop because if it does without gun control it'll prove what a load of **** it really is and that they surrendered for nothing.

 

redundant

 

... and you know NOTHING about me - and that's the point. Maybe you ought to look up the word "absurd".

You too ought to look up the word "absurd".

 

Yes. That's what I am telling you. Your claim is absurd.

Again ..... yes. I'm telling you.

 

You should as well. also being on a high horse with a giant ego is no way to convince people to agree with you. look up humility while you are at it.

 

my response was to your absurd claim.

you tell me about an absurd NRA conspiracy theory I point that out and you get butt hurt. good it means your position is irrational.

 

The length of my horse's legs are fine, thanks.

I'm not here to convince people to agree with me. From the superior vantage point atop my high horse, I am here to inform.

I never made a claim of convincing or caring what Americans think or do. That's what the absurd conclusion from your side of the room is based upon. If Americans want to shoot one another to smithereens that's their business. I'm only informing them how it came about that they are shooting one another. If they follow my advice the shooting will end but if they want to carry on "as is" ... it's no sweat off of my ****s.

My comment about the NRA is not a conspiracy theory. It is a plain fact, not even a secretive one. Whatever, it's not my problem.

Neither my horse's legs nor my butt feel any discomfort whatsoever. It would be a mistake to believe otherwise.

 

Well, just an observation, you come off as very condescending and arrogant. you were talking earlier about changing the constitution, maybe you should leave that up to people who are better at talking to people than you are. When you open your mouth and say something with this personality, people want you to be wrong just because they don't like you.

This is meant as constructive criticism. it isn't meant personally, so no offense is intended. sometimes i don't know how i sound to others.

So you are just preaching orthodoxies? sorry you wasted your time. I reject your othodoxy and you accomplished nothing.

then why are you failing so badly? In order to inform you have to have information. your ridiculous comment abot the NRA was profoundly ignorant. The NRA wishes they had that power. you don't know that so you can't inform.

Well i am glad you don't think the nonsense you posted is convincing.

Well i was going by your comments on amending the constitiution. in order to do that you have to convince people to vote for it.

see here is an example of what i mentioned earlier. you aren't at a superior vantage point you are completely blind. you can't inform because you don't know anything. This is why i chuckle at many of your posts. You have no clue about how the constitution works , how our culture is, I know this far better than you because it is MY constitution and MY culture. I know better than you.

Yes it was. the NRA dose not have that kind of cultural relevance. They don't have much power at allin our country. this is me from a superior vantage point informing you. [/QUOTE]It is a plain fact, not even a secretive one. Whatever, it's not my problem.[/QUOTE]It is somehow a fact because you insist it is? all you know is what you are allowed to read. I live here I have been a member and an employee of the NRA. you have not.

Good i am glad you aren't frustrated. it is just that i am in a position to know way more about this than you.

 

I can understand that. Americans are accustomed to popular cliches and catchphrases such as “like” and “basically” and “in terms of” and “multiple” etc. and it often makes them unclear as to what they want to say. I don’t have that problem. I speak concisely and I employ a broader vocabulary, but (as you say) it might come off as condescending and arrogant.

No. In this new era of internet censoring/deleting/canceling, nations such as North Korea and the USA are getting very little information. Americans (in any case) at least have access to much more than North Korea if they circumnavigate the hurdles but that window is closing very quickly. How does it apply to me personally? An example would be that I understand the meaning of a Constitution, Amendment, and Repeal: most Americans have no idea. So if they learn it from me isn’t that a good thing?

That’s for sure. But that’s on them. Right?

I actually understood that as soon as I began reading it.

Not preaching. Sharing. That’s definitely not a waste of my time at all.

Have I accomplished nothing in your heart? That’s on you but you’re not the only one here and I can assure you that you do not speak for everyone.

I’m not. Again, it’s up to you what you want to accept and what you reject but it would be a pity if you do not read my words and consider them.

We differ. I can link enough to cause you sleepless nights but I’m not in the business of churning up nightmares.

That’s a very silly thing to say particularly because you haven’t even named it.

I lived 20 years in the US. I am a Vietnam Veteran too. So maybe you should think again. IN ANY CASE, professors from around the world know much more about "YOUR constitution" and "YOUR culture" than you do. Are you willing to disagree with that?

That’s not necessarily true and you should now realize that.

 

Its really that you are trying to explain to me something iwould know better than you.

Nobody is learning about the constitution from you.

you are preaching.

I breifly worked as a poilce officer in this country you don't know anything. Just the pictures i have seen will make you unable to sleep again.

law perofessors reguarding the constitution perhaps, thats not you. if it is i would go to your college and demand your money back. as far as our culture no, no professor knows anything about it.

based on you posts I'm comfortable with what i said.

 

I've just now set my alarm clock 2 minutes earlier for tomorrow to make up for the time I wasted looking at this.

 

the stats are correctly represented.
While you're not commenting on "puching above your weight"

 

why, your posts are perfect illustrations of the term

 

I'd suggest you spend another 15 minutes trying to understand it.

 

Scattered & disconnected replies afford no understanding nor are they meant to.

 

ironic. maybe i am a faster reader.