Omarosa says Trump is a racist who uses N-word - and claims there's tape to prove it

Lenin far left but not as high on the authoritarian scale as Stalin. Mussolini next to Hitler, same for Franco.

 

Don't know how casinos work on the East Coast but in Las Vegas they employ Mormons to work in the counting room.
Mormons don't steal.

Howard Hughes was so scared of being ripped off he always surrounded himself with Mormons.

Even the Mafia prefers having Mormons to handle their money transactions.

It's just a good sound business practice.

 

Or if the prosecutor is dirty, biased, unscrupulous, desperate....

 

That happens, but I have faith that, overall, the system works and that the "dirty, biased, unscrupulous, desperate" are eventually caught and prosecuted.

The vast majority of human beings are good people trying to do the right thing. However, we're flawed and make mistakes. Anything made by humans, by it's very nature, is flawed. It's the way of the human world.

 

Show me one black person that doesn't spew the "N" word ..... Hypocrites .

 

Here is an excellent, succinct reasoning why submitting oneself to an interview is suicidal and exposes the person to perjury trap:

The theme the anti-Trump camp is pushing — again, a sweet-sounding political claim that defies real-world experience — is that an honest person has nothing to fear from a prosecutor. If you simply answer the questions truthfully, there is no possibility of a false-statements charge.

But see, for charging purposes, the witness who answers the questions does not get to decide whether they have been answered truthfully. That is up to the prosecutor who asks the questions. The honest person can make his best effort to provide truthful, accurate, and complete responses; but the interrogator’s evaluation, right or wrong, determines whether those responses warrant prosecution.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018...-concern-reason-to-decline-mueller-interview/

And the circumstances are not the best, the Mueller's investigation is a witch hunt, he is biased, desperate, his reputation is at stake and he has nothing...

 

Omarosa's Unhinged. Damn who didn't know that?

 

Your privacy is assured. Even the NSA nows nothing.

“The passage of more than three years hasn’t cooled the insistence in certain quarters that Clapper face charges for an admittedly false statement to Congress in March 2013, when he responded, “No, sir" and "not wittingly” to a question about whether the National Security Agency was collecting “any type of data at all” on millions of Americans.

About three months after making that claim, documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden revealed the answer was untruthful and that the NSA was in fact collecting in bulk domestic call records, along with various internet communications.”
US NEWS, The outgoing spy chief needs to be punished for lying, his critics say, By Steven Nelson, Nov. 17, 2016.
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...esume-calls-for-james-clapper-perjury-charges

 

Have been reading Arendt for the last few months. Worth the trouble.

"A one-party dictatorship added only one more class to the already
developing social stratification of the country, i.e., bureaucracy, which,
according to socialist critics of the revolution, "possessed the State as pri-
vate property" (Marx). 27 At the moment of Lenin's death the roads were
still open. The formation of workers, peasants, and middle classes need not
necessarily have led to the class struggle which had been characteristic of
European capitalism. Agriculture could still be developed on a collective,
co-operative, or private basis, and the national economy was still free to
follow a socialist, state-capitalist, or a free-enterprise pattern. None of
these alternatives would have automatically destroyed the new structure
of the country."
The Origins ofTotalitarianism, by HANNAH ARENDT, Meridian Books , A MERIDIAN HOOK, Cleveland and New York, 1958.
https://archive.org/stream/TheOriginsOfTotalitarianism/The-Origins-of-Totalitarianism_djvu.txt

 

Interesting. So what do you conclude from her writings?

 

'I've got the tapes to prove it!'

Unlikely, or they would already be available for you to link in your post.

 

Well, most guilty people are paranoid of being caught so I can see why they worry.

 

I've looked for that quote from her and all I've found is you saying it. Do you have a link or are you honest enough to admit you fabricated it?

 

You might note my use of ' instead of "

I paraphrased, and used appropriate grammar to indicate so.

 

That wasn't in your post. Did you correct it?

 

You've quoted my use of ' twice now.

"..." is a quote

'...' is not

 

NO WAY. They will be at maximum value before she sells. Omarosa is a GOOD apprentice.

 

Silliness. The only one acting all butt hurt is you. Hell she can't even effectively support her own crap.

 

Did you read what she actually said? Good lord not only has shenever heard him utter the words herself she doesn't even have the dam tapes.

 

Yes that would be in part why it is a false narrative.

 

Disagreed as our posts attest. Agreed. So far it's all "he said/she said".

 

Well she she said/she said since she can't support her own statements which are a best vaguely contradictory.

 

Obviously your mind is made up. Fine. What makes you the butt-hurt one here is that I haven't made up my mind. She says one thing and Trump says another. Who's telling the truth? I don't know. Both are well known liars and there's a lot of reasons to believe the truth is in the middle somewhere. Again, I don't know. Therefore, unless she can produce some evidence or corroborating witnesses, it's an unverified claim.

 

Racism is apparently a new 20th century word.

Merriam-Webster

Definition of racism
1: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2a : a doctrine or political program based on the assumption of racism and designed to execute its principles b : a political or social system founded on racism
3: racial prejudice or discrimination

1 and 2 are rare now. 3 is more common.

Bigotry has been stretched to cover racism.

Definition of bigot
: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

 

Not finding it now, but the Republicans ranked how advanced groups were, with whites on top of course, women women somewhat below, Trump right under women and of course, jblacks on bottom.


And interestingly, JEWs, which Trump says he LURVES, is ranked quite low, for having designs to take over the planet. They aren't that far above blacks.