One Year Later Still NO Evidence of Trump Collusion with Russia

It's a complicated process. Give it time.

 

Yes, it is called legal blackmail.

 

Yes, been going at this for over a year with attempts from Anti-Trump people to find anything he has done that rises to the level of criminal or impeachable, and they cannot find it.

 

And you wisely interpret that to mean they have nothing?

 

No. I wisely am skeptical of the claim of collusion until I see some evidence that says otherwise.

 

Sure there is evidence.
"Common Knowledge"

Common knowledge counts as fine evidence in the 21st Century.
Witness Trial by Media. It gets more and more popular.


Moi

r > g

Across an immense, unguarded, ethereal border, Canadians, cool and unsympathetic,
regard our America with envious eyes and slowly and surely draw their plans against us.​

 

Because rather than engaging in the topic you instead claimed my statement was a lie. I can only speculate as to why, perhaps it's because you are incapable of appealing to reason and logic.

Who cares what she was under investigation for? The point is that she was investigated for years - by the FBI, by the House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi, by journalists, by fake journalists, and by internet trolls. She has not been indicted or prosecuted for anything, yet I'm sure you still believe she's guilty of violating some law. So why aren't you willing to give the team investigating Trump a chance? If he's clean, won't it come out in the end?

 

Well indeed Hillary has been investigated and let off the hook regarding multiple scandals in which it is rather obvious she violated the laws. But if you were implying that she's been investigated for colluding with the Russians, it's not true. She also hasn't been investigated for rigging the primaries which there is ample evidence for. Now we have more scandals with the Fusion GPS, more secret emails being revealed, and the Uranium One and other various pay for play scandals.

I know that President Trump will be vindicated, in the meantime, the purpose of the investigation, to disrupt and destroy his presidency and criminalize politics, punish people who work for him with stupid process crimes unrelated to the bogus Trump collusion accusations, will go on.

 

You mean obvious like Trump's guilt is obvious?

You mean like Hillary was vindicated?

I didn't say that, imply it, or care about it because there is not reasonable cause to investigate her for that. But if actual law enforcement professionals want to look into her Russian ties it's no skin off my back.

There's bias, and then there's partisanship, and then there's the delusional alternate reality where you live.

 

We know for a fact they turned down such efforts and we know for a fact the DNC and Clinton campign not only attempted but DID.

 

And what have they confirmed not speculated but confirmed they did? Sell bogus info to the DNC and Clibton campaign?

 

You do realize that when Trump made that JOKE he was not talking about hacked emails from the DNC and podesta that make it to Wikileaks but the State Department emails which she had not turned over to be archived for the PUBLIC record as REQUIRED by the LAW. Emails that were under subpoena.

Are you really this confused or just pretending?

 

We know know no such thing. The campaign, even at the highest level, attempted to collude. We know that for a fact now. No attempt to change the subject changes that fact.

 

I do not speculate as to what the investigation by the diligent Trump Justice Department Special Counsel might conclude. In the interests of the nation, his final report must show thoroughness, and be based upon verified evidence, not just suggestions, indications and/or innuendos.

A hostile foreign power's attack upon America's democratic process in furtherance of its agenda merits the utmost scrutiny and exposure.

 

I am legitimately not confused and note, again, that Trump openly called for Russian hackers to act illegally in order to help his own political campaign.

Just imagine what he would do behind close doors.

 

What is even more amazing is that Trump's RW "defenders" seem to lack an even rudimentary understanding of the term "thorough and COMPLETED investigation".

As the RW has proven time and time again--they will say anything (including pushing the most Wild-Eyed of delusional pro-Trump narratives) to "defend" that EGREGIOUSLY UNPREPARED IMBECILE.

It is what it is. :smfh:

 

Yes you are, the joke was about the 30,000 emails the FBI was trying to recover NOT the hacking of the DNC computers. Emails that belong to us, official government documents that she was REQUIRED to turn over years before and she had refused. Russia and Russian hackers had nothing to do with those emails unless you are declaring in fact that Russia DID hack her shadow server and retrieved emails including ones containing our highest classified information. Is THAT what you are declaring?

 

You think Mueller is investigating a joke?

 

Evidence usually comes AFTER an investigation is completed. Be patient folks, you will need to wait with the rest of us. Likely our reactions will differ dramatically when is does reach completion.

 

If Russian hackers has her emails, then they obtained those emails illegally. Supplying illegally obtained documents to journalists would also be illegal.

 

Where did you get the idea I made such an assertion or are you just being obtuse? So you ARE claiming that the Russians hacked Clinton's official State Department emails by hacking her shadow server meaning they obtained classified information off them?

 

Woke up this morning and trump is still president.