Our first lady compared to the last one.

Another massive load of bovine excrement exposed by the FACTS!

https://www.celebheights.com/s/Donald-Trump-126.html

https://www.celebheights.com/s/Barack-Obama-4695.html

https://www.celebheights.com/s/Jeb-Bush-49206.html

The math doesn't lie but your BLOTUS does constantly!

 

Is this apart from the penis thing?

 

Trump would wear high heels to if he thought he could get away with making him look taller than Obama

 

You mean the rumour that Trumps penis is shaped like the mushroom character from Mario kart ?

 

Aww how cute. Explains your last president for sure.

 

<Rule 3>

cd8ed: "Some guy on the street corner said I hate the Jews."

Media: cd8ed said,"I hate the Jews."

No different at all than cd8ed: "I love those who fight against anti-Semites."

Media: cd8ed said "I love anti-Semites." No difference.

<Rule 3>

 

If he wasn’t bragging about it you might have a point — but he was, so you don’t.
Stop pretending like those were not his EXACT words in the exact same order — they were.

<Rule 3>

 

Irrelevant. He was quoting OTHER PEOPLE, brag or not, joke or not, deadly serious claim or not, whether he actually believed the joke or not. That he was quoting others is absolutely necessary context.
<Rule 3>

 

If he was quoting someone, he still said it.
You assertion that he did not say it is false and seeing that the vast majority of what he says is a lie I doubt a pollster said what he asserted in the first place.

Him following up with “it’s like incredible” while folding his fingers into the shape of a gun says all that is needed about the subject.
He was insulting the morality of his base but many of them are too <insert your favorite adjective> to have realized so they applauded.
That probably didn’t happen either did it?

 

Disgustingly dishonest. Not surprised. NO, if you quote someone, pollsters, song lyrics, read aloud from a f-ing book, it is not the truth that you "said it" yourself. What a childish, ignorant position to try to defend, yet here we are.

Also dishonest in that the truth is not as you spin it, but that the quote led to an amusing joke that the audience laughed at, your biased description is amazing in light of the fact that the video itself is right in the thread for anyone to watch. If he was "insulting" anyone it was the other candidates who didn't have similar voter loyalty in their polling numbers. That was the plain purpose of the whole segment for reasonable adults with greater than a snail's comprehension.

 

That's a very disingenuous form of argument and, in fact, is no argument at all. It's something I have seen a few people resort to here but you seem to be an intelligent person so surely you can do better than to use such cheap and duplicitous tactics.

 

What is duplicitous from saying he said remarks that he claimed to be taking from a “pollster”, made gun signs and said the statement was amazing?

Which part is incorrect?

 

What do you think saying something means, maybe we are having a disagreement about vocalized words (which is what I am discussing) — in your mind what does saying something mean?

I am glad that other candidates do not have the cult loyalty of some trump supporters, one is dangerous enough for democracy and rule of law.

 

#505 you said ... "Did trump say “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters," yes or no?"

Now let's take out everything before "I" and after "somebody" and totally ignore that you were allegedly quoting someone else. The fact remains that it is YOU who said "I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody".

See how this silly game works?

 

I wrote it, that would be an accurate statement — yes.
Is it not? Did I not write it?

 

Yes you wrote it. So by your reasoning it is YOU who should be held accountable for the statement even though you were quoting someone else who, in turn, was speaking in jest.

It wasn't one of his best efforts at humour, that's for sure, but take it in the vein it was meant. He wasn't groomed to be a polished politician and I doubt any career politician would come remotely close to withstanding the negativity Trump has had to endure and still be standing and this is why he will still be standing in 2020.

Round and round and round ...

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...dy-melania-trump-photos-calls-it-hate-speech/


Yet look at this. Thanks lefty.

 

Please direct quote me where I have ever said anything about anyone should be held accountable for the statement. Surely you are not lying to make your point?

Irregardless, and no matter how many times y’all scream he didn’t say that!!!, he did — it’s on video.

Yes, he will still be “standing” in 2020, 2021 will likely be a different story however unless his poll numbers improve. Everything he has had to “endure” is directly in response to his actions or words (aka things he said)

 

Well at least the first lady we have now is a woman!!!!!!

 

Donald is only specializing in bullying little children. With adult such as I, he developed the hurt foot syndrome and go hide like a little woosy that he is.

 

It should be the other way around. Michelle didn't subject her body to pornographic causes or marry her husband for money.

 

Yea, im sure he fears you all right ....

 

RWers do like fake news.

 

There's only so much you can do with strapping, and it can go wrong .. as hilariously witnessed on the Ellen Show.

 

I'm the last person to champion a conspiracy (or RW cause, for that matter), plus I'm observing the evidence in a purely clinical way - with no desire for her to be anything other than what she appears to be. But I would bet my entire career in 'human machine science' that Michelle is an unreassigned transgender woman. I think it would be an absolute miracle if she wasn't, in fact.

I'm confident that this is one of the rare occassions in which the Nutters actually got it right. Resistance to the idea almost certainly stems from either wishful thinking, or simple trans prejudice.