PA Sens Out 249,000 Ballots to Unverified Voters

https://www.theepochtimes.com/penns...eKy+u5aA1I6uAIyGL9EH5crDkbBJgoe3LMf6Nq5Ea+HMG

Pennsylvania’s Department of State Has Sent Out 249,000 Ballots to Unverified Voters. Contrary to the State Dept testimony to the legislature it decided to send out mail-in ballots before validating the ID. Invalid IDs don't necessarily mean fraud (though it might) but just common error. However it does show the myriad things that can go wrong or awry with large scale mail-in balloting and potentially wrongly affect an election.

To save the replies, I'll give the retort here: No proof of anything! Move on down the road and quit being an election denier!

 

As important as Democrats say voting-by-mail is you'd figure they'd have the system on lockdown. Clearly they either don't care about voting as much as we're told, or they don't care about election security as much as they claim. Because this is like the 10th different 'such and such sends ballots to wrong people' story we've seen this election season.

 

Considering your source, I'm glad you answered your own post.

 

Like fake news from CNN, election mistakes always seem to favor one side and only one side.

 

Stop me when this sounds familiar:

Under Obama an election was stolen due to hacked machines, changed ballots and all kinds of Russian stuff.

Under Trump we had the most secure elections in history which allowed a racist child sniffer who didn't campaign to get the most votes in history.

Under Biden the left has already said the midterms and 2024 elections have already been stolen.

Does any of this ring a bell?

 

Drive-by Ad Hominem, such as this, is the white flag of those who have no argument.

 

I've suspect Dems are benchmarking a new election tactic during these midterms, likely for full scale use next Presidential election. Going after poll watches by filing law suits based on Civil Rights Act law/voter intimidation and whatnot. A few low-key incidents have popped up this season in 3 different states, somewhat varied tactics, but the groups/names behind the legal action are the same so clearly its coordinated and IMO its a test run for large scale deployment.

 

I'm usually reticent to click on any thread started with a Breibart source, and usually don't.

ZERO chance I'm clicking anything from the Pulitzer winners at TheEpochTimes...



Here's a trusted site, calling this news BS.... as expected

SNIP
If a voter’s identification can’t be verified at the time they apply for a ballot, state law does require that the voter still be issued a ballot and be provided an opportunity until the sixth day after the election to provide the proper proof of identification. But counties are not to count the ballot unless the voter provides proof of identification.
ENDSNIP

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-pennsylvania-mail-ballots-unverified-voters-881685324818

I highlight the key passage for the slow coaches....

 

You know the DNC plans, "ROLL IT OUT" and make excuses for the failure later!

 

And your argument is?

 

Why, then, even participate in @Steve N 's topics at all? ...other than to simply troll the him, I mean. The "Attack the source" ad hom fallacy that you employed here is the most cowardly and pointless of fallacies. You've been defeated before you even opined on the topic.

 

Defeated ? What was the contest ?

There is no defeat if there was never a contest and there is no contest over falsehoods, regardless of the source.

 

delete

 

Your white flag of surrender is noted

 

The AP has its own issues recently that call it into question as to whom they are beholden to. When AP takes a side, it never goes against democrats. Funny, ironic actually.

 

I'm genuinely stumped to think of anything funnier than a guy pushing BS from The Epoch Times demeaning a news organization that has existed for over 175 years..

Also, this article isn't siding with Democrats... it's siding with a state government over a team of crapologists...

 

Your comment about "existed for over 175 years" is just a variation on the argument from popularity fallacy.

 

Since I'm not pushing the epoch times, you must be referring to someone else. If you cannot accept the culpability of the AP for their biased reporting I can't help you here.

 

Are you disputing what AP reported or just complaining about them?

 

So are they wrong?

 

I honestly don't think he's that far along in the process... He's still digesting the misrepresentation from The Epoch Times... it's hard to move off of that position once it's in the system...

It's just part of the continuing effort of people to crap on the election system they know NOTHING about...

 

The context was the use of the source, not the content from the source. If you'll recall from the initial complaint, the complaint wasn't that the information provided by Epoch Times was wrong, just that they were an incredible source. Why didn't you complain to the original poster who complained about Epoch? As for the AP, they have lots of examples of them pushing false news and narratives. Do you dispute that?

 

If you are asking is taking the democratic party's side a wrong behavior, I would suggest it is. The 5th estate is supposed to be unbiased. Or did you forget that part?

 

So is AP right or not??

 

Still not sure if that’s the law or not?