Yesterday, Charles Booker committed a hate crime. in the publication of the following ad, Booker, the democratic candidate in KY for Senate published a narrative that evokes nothing but hate, violence, and the admission that all he has is an unrequited hate for most of the state of KY. This is why we, as a nation cannot move on. Democrats, like Booker, insist that the world we inhabit today is the world of democratic party terror on black folk in this country. It is ironic. A cursory search found that there hasn't been a lynching in this country for decades. 1981 seems to be the last noted case. And yet, Charles here waxes on and on about a condition that does't even remotely effect the daily lives of the AA community. And yet, in Louisville alone over the past weekend, black on black murders continued. Black on black crime within the black community persisted. And Charles is silent. It's as if mr Booker has decided that the crime within the AA community is somehow beneficial, and he can't be bothered to offer a solution to that, just scream about a condition that he's never been exposed to. Typical.
We have segregated school districts. I went to a segregated school district. He is right to bring up the fact African Americans are discriminated against in the US. You want people to stop talking about race? Then stop making race an issue and desegregate society.
In Nashville, the black community has fought the city to resegregate their schools... Kind of undercuts your narrative. If you went to a segregated school district, what was the mechanism? You suggest these things but don't provide any detail. AA can lawfully not be discriminated against in this country. This has been the law since the 1960s. I understand democrats are loathe to give up their ways, but for crickey's sake, give it a shot... I didn't make race the issue. Mr Booker did. Try not to forget that. This is what hate in this country actually looks like. Folks, like mr Booker are the hate mongers these days. Putting his own neck in a noose is a hate crime. Pushing this narrative on the public in KY is a hate crime.
He committed a hate crime by filming a noose, putting said noose around his own neck. This is what the left have told us was a hate crime for the last decade.
If Brown was in 1964, and they’re fighting to desegregate schools still, there’s a reason for that. As for mechanism where I live? Deliberate government policy in some cases, but most of it through government policies like red lining and supporting white flight.
There was a typo, in Nashville, the AA community are trying to resegregate their schools. Autocorrect blows sometimes.
Ah gotcha. Let me rephrase my answer, If Brown was in 1964, and we are still having conversations over desegregating schools, we haven’t really done a good job of desegregating them and ending the issues now have we?
Hate speech. I cannot believe the Youtube/FB/Twitter haven't removed it already. But ya know, agendas and all....
The point for those folks in Nashville was they don't want their kids in schools with the "white oppressors"... blah blah... So, they demand separate schools there. There are several other local cities doing the same around the nation. Re-segregation seems to be something that the AA community is starting to embrace. Why would you say that is? Regardless, the add by mr Booker seems to engrain into the public narrative that all of the progress that finally lifted the yoke of democratic party terror on the AA community doesn't matter, and the only way to view the world is through his hate filled eyes.
Tell your peeps... But the hate crime should be fully investigated, by the FBI et al... like the garage door opener in AL at the NASCAR track...
Yeah which is why we haven’t solved these issues. Because they don’t trust white communities with their kids. This was the exact same issue during desegregation and look where that leads to. It leads us to today. They’re scared because they have good reasons to be scared.
You aren't being consistent here. We are desegregated today. Fact of law. The condition doesn't exist that you seem to want to address. The law doesn't agree with your point of view. But you do seem to fear letting evil white folks from having access to black children... That's scary.
Segregation also happens when parents move to safer neighborhoods (aka “new”) to get away from crime and violence, leaving poor people stuck there. If I ran the country, certain housing tracts would be condemned and bulldozed, and rebuilt as “new communities” (we are talking sqare miles, here) where new neighbors looked out for each other instead of robbing them. That is right up there with assigning official meaning to a knot. Or a chicken bone. Or fingers.
Ugh that’s why I hate typing on a phone. Thank you for catching that. And yeah that’s basically the problem.
“Nationwide protests have cast a spotlight on racism and inequality in the United States. Now a major bank has put a price tag on how much the economy has lost as a result of discrimination against African Americans: $16 trillion” https://www.npr.org/sections/live-u...-trillion-because-of-discrimination-bank-says
i usually don't trust much that comes from national communist radio. I'd suggest that perhaps you're misinterpreting your data points here as well. The point seems to be that the policies of democrats have retarded the growth of the economy by said 16T. The question, however, remains, why does an AA Senate Candidate in KY think it's OK to lynch himself in an election ad? It's disgraceful. It's hate fueled. This guys knows he doesn't have a chance beating Rand Paul. So instead of figuring out what the vast majority of KY want, he's more interested in fueling division and hate, and violence in the state.
That may be of interest to bankers, but not toWhite parents who are unwilling to enroll their children in a grand social experiment.
