Pam Bondi DROPS A MOAB ON Joe Biden and Son Hunter Biden at Senate Impeachment Trial

Ms Bondi gives an excellent rundown of the Biden situation, and this video is just part of her presentation.

The left wanted to impeach Trump, but for you Biden lovers out there, this impeachment may have also doomed him.

The video is just under 15 minutes long. For us Trump supporters this video is music to our ears. For Biden supporters and democrats in general, this video is poison.

 

LOL. They don't just have to prove there isn't any reason to suspect corruption, but they have to prove that Trump didn't suspect corruption. Given how unreasonable they portray Trump, it should be easy to convince them that Trump very well may have suspected corruption even when it wasn't reasonable to do so (even though it IS very reasonable to suspect corruption).

This whole thing is so transparently a sham.

 

Dershowitz is hitting it out of the park on how this is an invalid impeachment as none of the charges rise to impeachable offenses.

 

Her argument is really quite flawed.

First off, Hunter Biden joined a firm a year after its CEO, not the company, was under investigation.

Second, at the time that Joe Biden sought the firing of the prosecutor, even that investigation was dormant.

Third, the reason that investigation was dormant is because the prosecutor took bribes to place certain investigations on hold.

Fourth, Biden represented an international coalition that wanted the corrupt prosecutor fired including the EU, the IMF, and Republicans.

 

Too bad trump is already impeached, huh?

 

Trump will forever have the * by his name. *Impeached. History won't note that some people didn't like it. History won't note that Dershowitz spoke unless it's in an obscure grad paper. Just the way it is.

 

Perhaps you prefer someone giving their interpretation of events played out like a mobster would.

 

Whoa! That is not good for the Bidens.

 

The Republican Party has completely embraced outright lying as a political strategy, they once at least cared about mixing it with some truth but trump has shown them even that isn’t necessary. The base is either too corrupt to care or to ignorant to find factual data.

This new brand of zero accountability will either doom the Republican Party or it will doom the country. Time will tell.

 

History will forever call him America's 45th president, a distinction Clinton will never enjoy and already has people forgetting who the 44th was. And I really don't care about an asterisk, that's the kind of politics consumed by haters and devoured by Pelosi and Schiff. I'm just happy Clinton was never elected, Obama is almost erased and Trump is MAGA.

 

Why is it “poison” ?

If he did something wrong, then he should be prosecuted. But again, his guilt or innocence has absolutely NOTHING to do with Donald Trump. What he did was wrong no matter what the Bidens did. Thats a fact that just gets lost on the right.

She says that if Hunter Biden is guilty, “then their entire case is a sham and they know it”. Thats beyond laughable. Hunter Bidens guilt has absolutely no bearing on Trumps guilt. NOTHING, NANDA, ZILCH

We already have enough evidence that Trump did this. Hell, his new defense is that he did it, but that its not an impeachable offense. He’s not really even denying that he did it anymore, just that its “not impeachable”.

Ask yourself a very simple question......If he was so concerned about what Hunter Biden was doing, why didn’t he engage US Law enforcement to investigate him ? Why use “Giuliani, and why in gods name would he ask for it to be a “public announcement” from Zalenski ?

 

I do not prefer someone who refused to investigate Trump University after receiving an illegal campaign contribution from trump.

 

Are you writing history?

 

It was the only partisan impeachment in history. He also won’t be removed from office !

I give you a lot of credit for the work and posts you have made on this impeachment, but you are fighting a losing battle.

Trump will be Vindicated !

Clinton has done just fine through the years with an impeachment, disbarred lawyer, and felony on his record.

Trump will also be fine.

 

If there is a valid reason to investigate someone...then how can it be wrong to try to get one done?

 

No President has ever been removed from office.

 

The appearance of a conflict of interests is one reason why the person most likely to benefit politically from that investigation should not personally get involved with the seeking of the investigation.

Another is the fact that we have ordinary protocols for handling allegations against US citizens for conduct that might have taken place in another country for a reason. Putting the fate of our citizens in the hands of a foreign government, particularly one you are simultaneously accusing of being corrupt, without some significant oversight and control from a domestic investigative agency is opening a massive can of worms.

 

I stopped at "They must prove beyond reasonable doubt........," shouted 'crap' at the laptop screen and marvelled at the ignorance of the woman.

 

Isn’t this the same person wants to gut the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act?

 

Because Trump needs to prove his innocence?

 

So the President sits on their hands, not saying a thing, and does nothing despite it being part of their job, just because there might be political benefit?

Last I knew the President makes and/or approves of those protocols, and is not beholden to them.

So, in your whole post...where is the impeachable offense?

 

Trump will always be considered the president impeached for strictly bogus political reasons . . . and he Dem Party will never be able to escape from that judgement of history.

 

Nah...she was rabbiting on about Biden.

 

It will be known as the first partisan impeachment in American History.

I am sure the debate will go on for hundreds of years along party lines.
.

 

1. If Hunter Biden did something illegal in the Ukraine, it is a Ukrainian problem, NOT a US problem

2. If Joe Biden did something wrong, he engages US law enforcement, which he did NOT do hmmmmmm wonder why that is ?

Because he wasn't doing it for that reason and you know it. He didn't care about the guilt or innocence of the Bidens, just that it was public that a foreign country was investigating them. If he did care about it, then he engages AMERICAN authorities, not Rudy Giuliani

C'mon Kal. In the last week the even Fox News is claiming he did it, but that its "not an impeachabkle offense". Hell, thats his what is defense is claiming in the impeachment proceedings right now.