Discussion in '9/11' started by 10aces, Dec 28, 2011.
DNA was handled by government, the same government you don't trust
RIA is ????
That's not what you said. You said:
If the data on the FDR corroborates witness testimony that the jet passed to the north, then you're trying to say that the FDR was on the jet, and that the jet passed to the north. Inferred is the fact that the FDR was discovered in the rubble at the site without being "corrected" to match what the government said had happened.
Oh I've got you truthers figured out. You just make stuff up as you go along. Then when you get pinned you simply change your story.
Where on 28?
Reagan International Airport. You know... the airport less than a mile from the Pentagon? You're embarassing yourself.
Maybe people as stupid and gullible as truthers, but not to the average person and NOT to the people who know how to identify planes who correctly identified the plane.
BTW, the only paint on AA planes is the logo and the stripes. The rest is burnished aluminum. In other words, you would have to strip the paint off of the plane. So who did that? Truthers LOVE to create these MASSIVE conspiracies that would require THOUSANDS, yet they can never explain why not one person has ever come forward. It is the obvious absurdity of the truther theories that constantly eludes the truthers.
You've already been show the DNA was NOT handled by the government, but by civilian professionals. How many times are you going to repeat the same blatant lies? You can get away with it once, but once you've been shown the truth, from then on you're just lying your ass off.
So where is your evidence every single one of these civilians were in on the conspiracy and willing to risk their careers, their reputations and their lives facilitating the killing of 3000 Americans? How many people do you know that are willing to be part of that? Yet you want us to believe entire departments of the government are all in on it? Thats just (*)(*)(*)(*)ing retarded. You know it. I know it. Everyone reading this knows it.
Just out of bizarre morbid curiosity.....
What would you have done to get the DNA out of the field in Pennsylvania? Just list what you would have done....no blathering about trust/not trust....no innuendo about some mysterious force that is planning things. It's 9/11/2001....Flight 93 just crashed.....tell us what you would have done to get the DNA out of the field and identify the remains.
I do believe the metal is polished...d*******!
So your whole response to the asskicking you just received AGAIN is to whine about the finish on the aluminum and fling names? Wow! You're so good at this debate stuff! I think I see monkeys doing the same thing at the zoo if you stand too close. They don't have a good argument either.
Now, here's the real irony. In your desperate attempt to appear intelligent, you (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up yet again. Burnished means the same as polished.
tr.v. bur·nished, bur·nish·ing, bur·nish·es
1. To make smooth or glossy by or as if by rubbing; polish.
2. To rub with a tool that serves especially to smooth or polish.
A smooth glossy finish or appearance; luster.
Man, you really can't get anything right, can you. So tell us again who the d****** is..... Be honest this time.
I see you're posting here now. Hannibal, DDave, and Patriot911 have destroyed their credibility by their stands on this issue.
Hannibal destroyed his by lying, and DDave and Patriot911 destroyed theirs by tap dancing around the question instead of answering it. Candycorn ignored the question. Are you going to answer candycorn?
Let's hear your response to this Fangbeer. Do you agree with what Hannibal said in post #41?
Hey Scott. Why don't you quit (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)footing around and answer the questions about your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) theories. Oh, that's right. You HAVE no answers so you have to pretend the difference between 2 and 13 witnesses NONE OF WHOM BACK UP YOUR BULL(*)(*)(*)(*) is somehow relevant. See, that's the difference between paranoid delusions and the truth. The truth can be backed up. Paranoid delusions lead to more and more questions, none of which have answers. Nobody saw a plane leave the site, including the witnesses you're trying to pretend override the hundred or so other witnesses. Nobody saw two planes come in. There was no evidence of explosives planted at the site. Last time I checked, explosives would take out that side of the building, not make a nice neat hole and then take out three rings with gradually less damage.
Face it, Scott. You've had your ass kicked. Now we just sit around and watch you try and dig your way out of the hole you're in.
Funny how you think we've "destroyed our credibility" by "tapdancing around", yet you can't even come up with any kind of believable excuse for your own theories. What do you think that does to YOUR credibility?
I already answered them in posts #42 and #44.
You've already shown you're not an objective truth-seeker by your tap dancing around the question I asked you. You can pretend all you want but you have no credibility.
Idle speculation and name calling do not equal evidence.
This is a quote from an airlines web periodical.
"American Airlines, for its part, has remained faithful to its vintage look of polished aluminum, first used in the 1930s on its DC3s, with an orange lightning bolt running along the fuselage. It adopted the current red, white and blue stripes over a bare aluminum skin in the 1960s. (American estimates that it saves $12 million a year in fuel by not painting its planes."
So much for your attempt to correct me.
Just out of curiosity...why was the military responsible for the DNA indentification of civilian casualties?
Show us exactly how you came to the conclusion that ony two of those witnesses were in a position to see the plane.
Here's the info.
You are so full of (*)(*)(*)(*). The 757 would have had to fly over an extremely populated area where everyone is outside and right through the flight path of a major airport. You didn't answer that. You tucked tail and ran like a little girl! So show us where the national mall was cleared of people. PRETENDING nobody saw anything doesn't cut it. It only shows you're willing to ignore major unworkable flaws in your theories in order to push your agenda.
Next time you claim you've answered something, do us all a favor and actually answer.
And which part of polished is the same as burnished do you not understand? It is real simple. Maybe you should find an adult and have them explain this very simple concept to you since you apparently have such a hard time grasping it. Don't worry. It doesn't have to be a smart adult. Hell, even most children understand that two words can mean the same thing.
The first rule when you find yourself in a hole is to quit digging. You go out and get a bigger shovel!
Unless you polish aluminum constantly,it oxidates, giving it an almost brushed aluminum look..
They weren't. You've already had this pointed out to you in very clear terms. Why do you insist on lying about it? Do you think nobody else read where you got your ass kicked? Are you hoping nobody noticed that DMORT consists of civilians? Do you get confused between the military and the Department Of Human Services?
Here is the link to where you got your ass kicked over this
As a reminder, here is what DMORT is.
Can you read?
You never explained why the plotters supposedly involved the light poles when they didn't have to. Please explain...in your own words and stop hiding behind links that you'll later disavow.
All they had to do is increase the angle of approach or move the path and eliminate--in your words:
The cab driver
The removal of the light poles
The planting of the light poles
The towing of the cab to the place where it was found and/or the driving of a cab with a smashed in windshield to the place where it was found.
The "plants" in the rush hour traffic
And the payments to the teams, the cab drivers, and the "plants" who you say were there doing this.
Please answer the question and explain YOUR theories.
Again, no links. Your words.
Cat got your tongue?
Scotty my boy, you're so amusing when your cornered.
Got any response to the 103 witnesses that saw the plane hit the Pentagon?
Separate names with a comma.