Please cite your best evidence of "no-planes"

well then lets see your "crystal clear" hezerkahni video! LMAO

thats where that gif came from.

are you trying to say you cant see shadows or are you trying to say you want to read the ID plate?





oh and look at it suck that explosion right back in on the inboard starboard wing.... suck suck suck it in!!!!

your problem is that they didnt make it blurry enough!

 

yes, we all know plans hit the WTC

[video=youtube;u4MROSC2UVI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4MROSC2UVI[/video]

 

It's called condensation koko. If you knew anything about aviation you would know why.

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/3/1/0/0705013.jpg

 

No worse than that stupid blur offered up of Flight 77 by the goobment.

 

Why? you needed to see a plane before you'd admit one hit the pentagon?

Wasnt the people picking up plane parts off the lawn a clue?

 

Be nice to see something other than a blur of nothing that was claimed to be a plane, yeah. They were probably looking for pieces of the exploded missile to dispose of before anybody found one.

 

There is no such thing as 'best evidence' for no planes because there were planes used on 9/11, and to horrifying effect.

 

A missile would have taken the whole ring section out explosively.....fail


What is this need of yours to 'see' something.before you'd admit it happened?

 

So say you. But then, you say bearded cave dwellers outflanked out entire military for a couple of hours from a cave in Afghanistan too, so...

 

so you think thats condensation? seems like there is a hell of a lot of condensation!

 

There were NO 'bearded cave dwellers' that hijacked those planes on 9/11...and the ones in afghanistan just set things in motion

 

My mistake. Bearded cave dwellers in Afghanistan, AND several bearded cave dwellers over here, dismantled and owned the entire US military, and all the intelligence resources of our country for about two hours. I stand corrected.

 

but there arent any wings missing, oh you mean the whiskers on his face?



[video=youtube;vw61gCe2oqI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vw61gCe2oqI[/video]

oh wait we couldnt see them on the original HD anyway.

OOPSIE

another theory from dablunder website bites the dust like all the other theories from dablunder websites.

 

You stand wrong,as usual.....

 

You claim is incorrect. That not a plane nose or a cgi plane nose (its not even the correct shape)...It's debris being pushed through the building by the plane and pressure. If you had bothered to post the longer clip, you would see that. Of course, you're not interested in losing the debate or the truth...you just want everyone to think you're right. You're not.

This bogus "nose in - nose out" claim was debunked years ago. How telling it is that YOU drag it up again. You are only doing it because you believe it supports the no-plane myth. Why not post the longer version of the clip?

Why?....because you can see it not the nose of the plane but, debris.




More on debunking the "nose out" lie:
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Nose_out

 

another apples to oranges obfuscation attempt. First, you claim is absolute nonsense as the eyewitnesses, one of which I was, on the ground heard and saw the second plane crash into the tower. In my case, I saw then heard.

You keep complaining about "certified" witness as though you think that a real term. It's not. Not to mention, you go just about anywhere near Ground Zero and find people who saw it happen.

You claim is bogus...you are 0 for 2 now.

 

what, did you think the US military was invincible?

 

You arguments are as failed as those of 7/11...who believes "orbs" crashed into the WTC. How does he come up with this hypothesis???...Simple!...just like you, he abandons all common sense and logic, finds a highly compressed, highly artifacted of poor quality and then says, "See!".

I asked you before and you didn't answer...
How was it possible to gather up all the photos and videos shot from all those individuals on the ground that day...add a plane in the correct context, angle, focus level, brightness and have them available for the internet within a couple of day?

...AND, why aren't the people who took those image complaining that their property was altered?

 

Nope....there's a reason it's called a 'sneak attack'

 

Why does harry drink coke instead of pepsi? Why do some farts stink and other farts you cant smell?

Like 7? that hilarious! Not into smudges orbs and one plane is bigger than the other and all that other crazy (*)(*)(*)(*).

This is obviously a troll post since I just showed you an HD movie that was converted to gif with NO SUBSTANTIAL LOSS and 2 posts later you come in complaining about the quality of the gif even after I proved that there is virtually NO LOSS.

Moral of the story never depend on dablunder sites because it can get quite painful in the end.

BUT instead of being sunk you can come out shining like a star! Lets see your crystal clear nonmodified original 2001 hezerkhani clip at the same magnification levels as the gif that actually has a plane impacting the wtc instead of internal explosions being covered up by an overlaid plane. If you really knew what you claim you know you would see the overlay blend blunders as well.

That all it takes man, I await your pristine tack sharp crystal clear Hezerkhani video at the same magnification.

 

Blah...blah...blah...YOU HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED...COMPLETELY REFUTED. The three frame clip clearly shows the image is nothing more than debris. If it weren't debris and was a CGI nose or real nose, it would not have lost it's shape (..and the shape itself is not that of a plane nose) but it did.

It's debris, not a CGI image.

Debunked.

Second

No substantial loss??? Are you really that clueless??? Tell me something, how many colors are available in HD and how many colors are available as a .gif format image?

Your claim only proves your ignorance.

 

LMAO

now that funny!

it shows no such thing! dablundered you mean! LOL

Thats what happens when you over run the mask! LOL Come on this is simple (*)(*)(*)(*)!

black and white pictures are just as clear and detailed as color pictures. so the color pallet is completely another dablunder red herring. I am telling you people to stop trusting these dablunder sites.

not so fast, if you apply filtering you can plainly see its not debris but a cgi (*)(*)(*)(*)up which is why the tv broadcasts did a momentary blackout to try and cover up the (*)(*)(*)(*) up! LMAO

.








just look at the sun reflecting off that nice shiny paint job!

 

No planers yet again showing images of planes hitting the towers, as evidence that no plane hit the towers. Thousands of people saw them. No planers are just ignorant.

 

Answer the question. How many colors are available in HD and how many in .gif format...and then tell me how there is no loss. Pretending to know something you don't only makes you look more stupid.

Second, I see you only show the first frame...which in no way looks like a nose of a plane, if its CGI, then why does the third frame lose its shape?...I mean, its CGI after all, right?

Give up, you've lost...you're just sounding more and more absurd.

This claim, "nose out" claim has been debunked.

 

not in life

in fact many people including reporters said there were no planes but the new media only played the fake plane vids and ignored them.


still waiting for your thousands of certifications of the people you claim saw them.