Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Golem, Mar 27, 2019.
Not really, actually more like none. No reason to keep believing the farce...
Can you quote one?
That model ignores multiple factors and explores a non-issue entity like CO2 instead oceanic methane release, magnetic pole movement, and many other items that effect climate more than man ever could. Are you saying all the other models and predictions are invalid then? Because there are a lot of models, a lot of predictions, and almost all of it wrong or pure lies...
Who cares? Point is that it was spot on!
And... look at this.... you're still struggling to find even one that was wrong. That's hilarious!
No. But you said that they were all wrong. And I just proved you damn wrong!
Thanks for playing....
Wait. When I was in school we were told that we were creating an ice age.
You actually see no difference between something your kindergarten teacher told you might be happening and something that was later proven in a Scientific Consensus?
So what they told me in school was not true?
I have no idea what they told you in school. What they told me in school was that there were two possible threats caused by contamination. And that they were being analyzed by scientists. One was that accumulation of gases in the atmosphere would cool down the planet, and would cause an ice age, like in Europa. Another was that they would cause a Green House effect and the earth would warm, like Venus. At that point, there was not enough proof of either. Proof accumulated in favor of Global Warming until it became a Scientific Consensus. That's how knowledge evolves.
The two possible threats were also analyzed in the original Cosmos series and book by Carl Sagan, where he gave the pros and cons of each hypothesis in the 1980s
You must be younger than me. They told me that we were going to have another ice age.
Oh, those crazy statist schools. Today it's an ice age, tomorrow it's warming. Today eggs are bad for you, tomorrow eggs are good for you.
That's what I'm explaining. Did you not read?
If you don't want to be wrong, wait until there is a scientific consensus.
Yes. I read. But what you wrote didn't change the fact that they told me there was going to be an ice age. Oh, these experts. They know everything....
Nothing has been proven, especially since all the predictions we've been fed have been wrong for decades...
I had people telling me that global warming was going to end the world in 12 years, 12 years before AOC was born.
I'm just bitter, my Appalachian beachfront property didn't materialize after I watch "An Inconvenient Truth"....
I'm still hanging on to my Otisburg property and keeping my fingers crossed.
I have already proven to you that that statement is false. You have not even made an attempt at rebutting my proof. So, at this point, repeating it can only be attributed to religious faith. And not only is this not the Religion forum, I am not in the habit of questioning people's religious beliefs.
No you haven't provided any proof, that's the whole problem, nor have you begun to show the corrections to the false predictions, or why those predictions were false decades later...
The new green deal is a train wreck that would cost trillions we will never have.
And billions of lives.
Cut emissions in half?
Did she seriously just move the goalposts halfway up the field thinking nobody would notice?
Separate names with a comma.