1. PF has switched to Xenforo. Please see this post for more details. Search and other functions are still being worked on.
    Dismiss Notice

Prove that zero of United 93 was buried.

Discussion in '9/11' started by NAB, Feb 15, 2012.

  1. NAB

    NAB New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The topic of this thread requires some history, but there is a glaring inconsistency that needs to be addressed by one of PF's posters.

    The following transcript from this thread will lay out the topic to be addressed.

    In this thread:

    [​IMG]

    Clearly more than zero. I await evidence to back up this "zero" buried claim.
     
  2. NAB

    NAB New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm really curious why suede is unwilling to back up his claim.

    He's made thread after thread focusing on the minutiae of what "percentage" was buried, yet can't back up his zero percent buried claim?
     
  3. l4zarus

    l4zarus New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    822
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Maybe now there are three Flight93 threads, he will feel he can relax and open up; the pressure isn't all on him and his threads. I for one can't wait to hear his evidence!
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Three?.....maybe three NOW
     
  5. l4zarus

    l4zarus New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    822
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sorry, I meant three NEW ones...
     
  6. NAB

    NAB New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Considering he entered this forum in a disingenuous manner, it should come as no surprise that he continues with that approach.
     
  7. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    A hole...some metal. (placed in the hole by the bucket scoop).
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Show some proof that the metal was placed in the hole by the 'bucket scoop'. This image was used as evidence in a trial. Do you know something the defense attorneys didn't?
     
  9. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    0
    the 'bucket scoop' is called a backhoe....it articulates in such a way.that it would be hardto put anything in the bucket....
     
  10. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So what is your proof this WASN'T taken at Shanksville? You can deny ANY photo just by pretending ignorance, but all it does is prove ignorance. Without evidence backing your claims up, all they are is bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
     
  11. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Show some proof that it wasn't? The fact that it was used in trial proves absolutely nothing, other than it was used to represent "something". So, there's ONE.....got anything else in the way of photographic evidence as to 93 being "buried"? By the way...the rusted metal didn't look to be "buried" there either.
     
  12. NAB

    NAB New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That is the Truther mantra in a nutshell right there. You attempt to place your anonymous opinion on an equal level with something that was submitted as evidence in a court of law.

    Well wedged sir.
     
  13. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    It was submitted as evidence..perhaps.

    It proves...???? What? That there is a rusty piece of metal on top of a hole. What hole? Where? When? Of what? Who says it was represented as 93's engine, in Shanksville, 0n 9/11/2001? Any corroborating evidence of a photographic nature? Anything?
     
  14. NAB

    NAB New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
  15. l4zarus

    l4zarus New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    822
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
  16. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
  17. NAB

    NAB New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Back to Youtube vids for you I guess.

    Btw, the topic of this thread is prove that zero percent of United 93 was buried (something your buddy suede claimed yet appears afraid to defend). At least three of those photos that were presented as actual EVIDENCE in a trial show debris that was in the ground.

    So anyway....
     
  18. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't doubt that they were presented in trial. I'm merely disputing (at this particular point in time) that they show no "proof" confirming anything about 93, it being buried (or anything else for that matter). The FBI claimed it was buried underground almost entirely...I didn't. I'm just repeating their obvious lies for the purposes of further confirming that 9/11 was a huge farce.
     
  19. NAB

    NAB New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Here's the thing 'fraud, this is the part where you provide some evidence backing your assertion.

    As it stands, the only thing your speculation proves, is that it's your speculation and nothing else.
     
  20. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah...I suppose. Funny thing about a lot of videos though. They're often good at verifying or discrediting slanted opinions (or outright lies). Not always final proof, but certainly a "tool" in determining the truth (for those that are actually looking for it).
     

Share This Page