Read It: Fauci's Deposition Covering Mask Mandates, Gain-of-Function Research, and More

Attorneys General for Missouri and Louisiana released the full 446-page transcript from their recent deposition of Dr. Anthony Fauci — the aspiring cover model and face of America's response to COVID-19 — just before his retirement from government service as the highest paid federal bureaucrat.

The deposition by AG Eric Schmitt of Missouri and Jeff Landry of Louisiana was taken on November 23rd as part of the two states' legal action against the Biden administration for its alleged collusion with big tech and social media companies to censor Americans' speech.

"Missouri and Louisiana are leading the way in exposing how the federal government and the Biden Administration worked with social media to censor speech," AG Schmitt said in a statement along with the transcript. "In our deposition with Dr. Fauci, it became clear that when Dr. Fauci speaks, social media censors. I encourage everyone to read the deposition transcript and see exactly how Dr. Fauci operates, and exactly how the COVID tyranny that ruined lives and destroyed businesses was born,"…










Read more news: https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spencerbrown/2022/12/05/read-it-faucis-deposition-covering-mask-mandates-gain-of-function-research-and-more-n2616763









The great evil one has been exposed. Our country has been thoroughly Fauci’d. He lied and people died.

 

The blatant government censorship of differing ideas, knowledge, and beliefs has now been proven beyond reasonable doubt

 

the deposition is sealed under court order. i don't know the missouri atty gen, but landry is not a credible source. would love to see what fauci actually said.

 

And what bias are you coming from to state that the AG of a state is not credible? Link? Source?
The Missouri AG is their US Senator elect.

 

SOMETHING TO HIDE: Report Suggests Fauci Tried to Suppress Lab Leak Theory.

And that he has approved the funding to teach a harmless virus how to be a deadly infection in humans.

And, we still don't have a full picture of just what in the hell we were doing in the bioweapons labs in Ukraine that had Putin so concerned.


Evil. He bears some responsibility for the blood of 5,000,000.

'Dr. Anthony Fauci worked to debunk the theory that COVID-19 came from a lab by pushing for a “Proximal Origins” paper to suggest the virus originated elsewhere.'

I'm not positive that this virus came out of the lab, but, it was always, clearly, a real possibility, not a wild ungrounded conspiracy, which is what they claimed as they suppressed it, even while concealing Fauci's approval of US funding for the research, which while it does make them look guilty as hell, isn't actual physical evidence.

'Dr. Fauci “prompted” the drafting of a publication that would “disprove” the lab leak theory, the authors of this paper skewed available evidence to achieve that goal and Dr. Jeremy Farrar went uncredited despite significant involvement.'

LAB LEAKS FROM CHINA ARE NOT UNCOMMON

'The Department of Energy (DOE) stated in February that the Hong Kong Flue likely started in a lab. The FBI came to the same conclusion in 2021.'

But with Wuhan, they claimed that the very suggestion was proof of racism.

'A string of emails proves Fauci was aware that COVID might have come from a Chinese lab as early as April 2020. The emails also suggest there was a “pipeline” of money going from the National Institute of Health (NIH) to EcoHealth Alliance, which then gave it to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to study “SARS-like viruses.”'

'COVID most likely came from a lab in China.
The NIH may have helped pay for the research on the virus.
Fauci allegedly knew all along that the virus came from a lab and has been trying to deny the theory.
The new statement by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic suggests that Fauci asked people to dispel the “lab leak theory,” including Dr. Farrar, the master blaster at the commie-dominated WHO.'

Again, we aren't certain that this came from a lab, but that's is a very strong candidate.

 

It's like Missouri and Louisiana forgot who the president was when the pandemic first hit.

 

The above post claims this is an attempt by the biden Administration to censor speech.

How do you feel at others attempts to censor free speech in the Florida Legislature such as:

Bill S1316 The Florida Disinformation act
This bill would make it illegal for bloggers and internet news sources to write about the Governor, the cabinet, or legislative leaders with out registering with the state government.

Bill S 1320 Child Protection in Public Schools Act
Forbids the use of personal pronouns that do not match an individual's proper sex by all school employees and students in a public schools.

People who love free speech should also be very afraid of two laws presently on the Florida Senate and Backed by the governor. This is a challenge to my conservative friends because it agrees with their calls for free speech, but it comes from a popular Republican governor.

 

I find your conclusion puzzling.

On what basis are you concluding that Missourri and Louisiana forgot who was President when the pandemic hit?

 

What difference would that make? The foundation for the pandemic was architected under Obama. It's like you forgot that or something.

 

They are taking legal action against the Biden administration for its collusion with Big tech to censor American's speech.

Whatever it is they are suing over, began before Biden took office.

 

LOL... truth doesn't seem to exist in your wokeness... In your mind, does seeing a degreed person who has a demonstrably different political bent and the ability to use the force of government to censor or imprison you, give you a little power trip? That seems pretty convenient. Why should anyone give your recommendation credence? Cause you said? Mommy says, soo..... Laughable.

 

I suppose the relevant sentence from the OP is this one...."Missouri and Louisiana are leading the way in exposing how the federal government and the Biden Administration worked with social media to censor speech,"

If they are suing for the actions of the Biden Administration working with Social Media to censor information on a lab leak, why would that involve the Trump administration?

Wasn't the Trump administration the one that had been pushing the lab leak theory all along? Are you saying that while pushing the lab leak theory, they were also colluding with Social Media to squash the story?

 

Dr. Fauci was an employee of the Trump administration before the Biden administration.

At best, both administrations covered up the lab leak theory.

 

LOL... you and the romper room lens... Simply priceless..

 

Indeed he was an employee of the NIH which in a manner of speaking one can say is an employee of the government and by extension the President.

But what does that have to do with legal action aimed at the specific actions of the Biden administration working with social media to censor the lab leak story?

How are you possibly rationalizing that the Trump administration was working with social media to squash the lab leak story that they were specifically pushing and being called racist for doing so? Why would they do that?

That simply does not make any sense. It would be like accusing Bernie Sanders of colluding with Social Media to squash talk of Medicare for all. Why would he do that?

You can accuse Trump of a lot of things. Colluding with Social Media to squash the lab leak theory is NOT among them. My goodness, that does not make a lick of sense.

I suppose that next you will accuse Trump of colluding with Social media to squash the Hunter Biden laptop story.

 

Really! The foundation was architected 3 years before it happend by Obama. If that is the case, and I doubt it, how could Obama know that it was coming and how could Trump not recognize it?

The foundation for the entire covid response was built by decisions made by the Trump administration and yet there are people today that forget that.

 

In the case of the state of Florida teaching kids to be self absorbed narcissistic little twits who think the English language should be changed just to suit them strikes me as a horrible idea. Sorry but if the teachers in Florida, weren't agenda driven twits instead of eductaors such a law would be unnecessary.

 

Ah Fauci, the Mengele of our time. There is a special place in hell for this POS.

 

I forgot it is ok to limit speech if you don't agree with it.
My theory is that if the tide ever shifts the precidence set here may have consequences you don't like.

 

Of course it is okay to limit speech in the work place, it's fine all the time. The school room Is their work place, they don't get to teach what ever rabid bullshit they want. They are restricted to the state mandated curriculum, that just changed, if they don'tike it they are perfectly free to find a teaching position somewhere else.

 

If that is the case why is the law also directed towards the private workplace?

The law, which has become known as the “Stop WOKE Act,” prohibits workplace training or school instruction...
https://time.com/6168753/florida-stop-woke-law/

 

Now this is the one that always baffled me. Why would any self respecting leftist be on board with the boss browbeating and bullying his employees? And that's what those always wind up being some sort of one off Sturm und drag session where half the people there are expected to confess to crap they never did and wouldn't even think about doing in the normal course if events all led by some ass with a chip on his or her shoulder the size of an aircraft carrier.

 

All I see is an opinion article, not the actual deposition. Somehow, I don't think the deposition is going to be as "forthcoming" than what the opinion article claims.

But here is the actual deposition where the article fails to link.

Here is an excerpt from that disposition. "Q. Did you, at any time later, become aware 13 that NIAID was funding this project understanding the 14 risk of bat Coronavirus emergence? 15 A. I became aware of this after all of the 16 attention was put on it, following the early part of 17 January, February, mid-March of 2020, but I certainly 18 was not aware -- well, I wouldn't say certainly"

What I highlighted in bold would not give Dr. Faucci any legal liability per se if this holds true in court. Dr. Faucci was aware after the fact, and not aware prior to the event, which dismisses any and all conspiracy theories relating to Dr. Faucci. Dr. Faucci also testified that he does not individually approve grants but goes through a multilayer process of peer reviews. That too will not hold Dr. Faucci legally liable.

 

What has this to do with Government restricting free speech. I am not responsible for the need to do so. The Constitution says No law. Not some laws.

I also think you may have violated the same law: You see the law prohibits " A person, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, bears personal responsibility for and must feel guilt, anguish or other forms of psychological distress because of actions, in which the person played no part, committed in the past by other members of the same race, color, national origin, or sec. "

 

Again we have all kinds of laws against creating hostile work environments. Why do you think it should only apply to women and minorities?